mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>
To: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>, Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
	Joel Granados <joel.granados@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
	Jan Harkes <jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>,
	Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-um@lists.infradead.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu,
	coda@cs.cmu.edu, linux-mm@kvack.org, ntfs@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] VFS/xfs/ntfs: drop parent lock across d_alloc_parallel() in d_add_ci()
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2026 15:01:30 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ar9IuknaJqrGoF-j@hyunchul-PC02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260929034158.1455429-2-neilb@ownmail.net>

On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 01:36:01PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> From: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>
> 
> A proposed change will invert the lock ordering between
> d_alloc_parallel() and inode_lock() on the parent.
> When that happens it will not be safe to call d_alloc_parallel() while
> holding the parent lock - even shared.
> 
> We don't need to keep the parent lock held when d_add_ci() is run - the
> VFS doesn't need it as dentry is exclusively held due to
> DCACHE_PAR_LOOKUP and the filesystem has finished its work.
> 
> So drop and reclaim the lock (shared or exclusive as determined by
> LOOKUP_SHARED) to avoid future deadlock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>

For the NTFS part,

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>

-- 
Thanks,
Hyunchul

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-02  6:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-29  3:36 [PATCH 0/7] multiple-filesystems: prepare for changes to VFS locking NeilBrown
2026-09-29  3:36 ` [PATCH 1/7] VFS/xfs/ntfs: drop parent lock across d_alloc_parallel() in d_add_ci() NeilBrown
2026-10-02  6:01   ` Hyunchul Lee [this message]
2026-09-29  3:36 ` [PATCH 2/7] shmem: use d_duplicate() NeilBrown
2026-09-29  3:36 ` [PATCH 3/7] coda: don't d_drop() early NeilBrown
2026-09-29  3:36 ` [PATCH 4/7] configfs: remove d_add() calls before configfs_attach_group() NeilBrown
2026-09-29  5:07   ` Al Viro
2026-10-01  1:32     ` NeilBrown
2026-09-29  3:36 ` [PATCH 5/7] hostfs: don't d_drop() before d_splice_alias() in hostfs_mkdir() NeilBrown
2026-09-29  3:36 ` [PATCH 6/7] procfs: drop parent lock for d_alloc_parallel() in iterate_shared() NeilBrown
2026-09-29  3:36 ` [PATCH 7/7] ovl: stop using lookup_one() in ovl_iterate() NeilBrown
2026-09-30 13:35   ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-30 21:43     ` NeilBrown
2026-10-01  7:33       ` Amir Goldstein
2026-09-30 10:22 ` [syzbot ci] Re: multiple-filesystems: prepare for changes to VFS locking syzbot ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ar9IuknaJqrGoF-j@hyunchul-PC02 \
    --to=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=coda@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=fuse-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jaharkes@cs.cmu.edu \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel.granados@kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=neil@brown.name \
    --cc=ntfs@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®