mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Masney <masneyb@kernel.org>
To: blaze <1466528493@qq.com>
Cc: kernel@esmil.dk, hal.feng@starfivetech.com,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: starfive: jh7110: Fix clk reference leak for pll0_out in jh7110_syscrg_probe()
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2026 09:50:31 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <arZ8JwLVP-WeKjIw@x1g10> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_0D58C9974B2D7889109BACF393650FFD8706@qq.com>

Hi blaze,

On Wed, Sep 09, 2026 at 12:43:31PM +0800, blaze wrote:
> In jh7110_syscrg_probe(), the handling of the three PLL clock outputs
> (pll0_out, pll1_out, pll2_out) follows the same pattern: clk_get() is
> called, and on success clk_put() is called before setting the pll entry
> to NULL. However, the pll0_out branch is missing clk_put(), unlike
> pll1_out and pll2_out which correctly call clk_put(pllclk).
> 
> Additionally, when clk_notifier_register() fails, the error path returns
> without releasing the clock reference, leaking it.
> 
> Fix this by calling clk_put(pllclk) after clk_notifier_register(),
> matching the pattern used for pll1_out and pll2_out. Placing clk_put()
> before the error check covers both the success and error paths.
> 
> Fixes: cc46f7c9edc4 ("clk: starfive: jh7110: Add PLL clock source support")
> Signed-off-by: blaze <1466528493@qq.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7110-sys.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7110-sys.c b/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7110-sys.c
> index 0000000..1111111 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7110-sys.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/starfive/clk-starfive-jh7110-sys.c
> @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ static int __init jh7110_syscrg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		priv->pll_clk_nb.notifier_call = jh7110_pll0_clk_notifier_cb;
>  		ret = clk_notifier_register(pllclk, &priv->pll_clk_nb);
> +		clk_put(pllclk);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  		priv->pll[0] = NULL;
> --
> 2.43.0

This patch is malformed and won't apply. You should consider using b4:

https://b4.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/contributor/send.html

Brian

      reply	other threads:[~2026-09-25 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-09  4:43 blaze
2026-09-25 13:50 ` Brian Masney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=arZ8JwLVP-WeKjIw@x1g10 \
    --to=masneyb@kernel.org \
    --cc=1466528493@qq.com \
    --cc=hal.feng@starfivetech.com \
    --cc=kernel@esmil.dk \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®