* [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Use snprintf() to construct pin bank names
@ 2026-09-27 19:07 Mariia Nikitash
2026-09-28 21:43 ` Justin Stitt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mariia Nikitash @ 2026-09-27 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: krzk, s.nawrocki, peter.griffin, linusw
Cc: alim.akhtar, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel, linux-hardening, morbo, kees, justinstitt,
aleksandr.loktionov, codemender-patching+linux, Mariia Nikitash
From: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
samsung_banks_node_get() constructs each pin bank node name by copying
bank->name with strscpy() and appending the suffix with strlcat().
In preparation for removing the deprecated strlcat() API[1], format the
node name in a single snprintf() call, which preserves the existing
truncation check against sizeof(node_name).
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/370 [1]
Cc: codemender-patching+linux@google.com
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Mariia Nikitash <nikitash.mariiaw@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
index 5ecc9ed4c44d..0d639eec689c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
@@ -1155,8 +1155,7 @@ static void samsung_banks_node_get(struct device *dev, struct samsung_pinctrl_dr
bank = d->pin_banks;
for (i = 0; i < d->nr_banks; ++i, ++bank) {
- strscpy(node_name, bank->name, sizeof(node_name));
- len = strlcat(node_name, suffix, sizeof(node_name));
+ len = snprintf(node_name, sizeof(node_name), "%s%s", bank->name, suffix);
if (len >= sizeof(node_name)) {
dev_err(dev, "Too long pin bank name '%s', ignoring\n",
bank->name);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Use snprintf() to construct pin bank names
2026-09-27 19:07 [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Use snprintf() to construct pin bank names Mariia Nikitash
@ 2026-09-28 21:43 ` Justin Stitt
2026-09-28 22:00 ` Bill Wendling
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Justin Stitt @ 2026-09-28 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mariia Nikitash
Cc: krzk, s.nawrocki, peter.griffin, linusw, alim.akhtar,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-gpio, linux-kernel,
linux-hardening, morbo, kees, aleksandr.loktionov,
codemender-patching+linux
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 12:07:58PM -0700, Mariia Nikitash wrote:
> From: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
>
> samsung_banks_node_get() constructs each pin bank node name by copying
> bank->name with strscpy() and appending the suffix with strlcat().
>
> In preparation for removing the deprecated strlcat() API[1], format the
> node name in a single snprintf() call, which preserves the existing
> truncation check against sizeof(node_name).
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/370 [1]
> Cc: codemender-patching+linux@google.com
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mariia Nikitash <nikitash.mariiaw@gmail.com>
Are you forwarding this patch on behalf of Bill? I see Bill as the
author of the commit and I recall seeing this in some series he sent
earlier [1] and this patch you've sent doesn't seem to be a v2.
Let me know what your role is on this patch and why it has been
separated out from Bill's series.
It is entirely possible that I am lacking context. Please fill me in :)
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> index 5ecc9ed4c44d..0d639eec689c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> @@ -1155,8 +1155,7 @@ static void samsung_banks_node_get(struct device *dev, struct samsung_pinctrl_dr
>
> bank = d->pin_banks;
> for (i = 0; i < d->nr_banks; ++i, ++bank) {
> - strscpy(node_name, bank->name, sizeof(node_name));
> - len = strlcat(node_name, suffix, sizeof(node_name));
> + len = snprintf(node_name, sizeof(node_name), "%s%s", bank->name, suffix);
> if (len >= sizeof(node_name)) {
> dev_err(dev, "Too long pin bank name '%s', ignoring\n",
> bank->name);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260915081910.4142719-17-morbo@google.com/
Thanks
Justin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Use snprintf() to construct pin bank names
2026-09-28 21:43 ` Justin Stitt
@ 2026-09-28 22:00 ` Bill Wendling
2026-09-28 22:07 ` Justin Stitt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bill Wendling @ 2026-09-28 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Justin Stitt
Cc: Mariia Nikitash, krzk, s.nawrocki, peter.griffin, linusw,
alim.akhtar, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel, linux-hardening, kees, aleksandr.loktionov,
codemender-patching+linux
On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 2:43 PM Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 12:07:58PM -0700, Mariia Nikitash wrote:
> > From: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
> >
> > samsung_banks_node_get() constructs each pin bank node name by copying
> > bank->name with strscpy() and appending the suffix with strlcat().
> >
> > In preparation for removing the deprecated strlcat() API[1], format the
> > node name in a single snprintf() call, which preserves the existing
> > truncation check against sizeof(node_name).
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/370 [1]
> > Cc: codemender-patching+linux@google.com
> > Assisted-by: LLM
> > Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mariia Nikitash <nikitash.mariiaw@gmail.com>
>
> Are you forwarding this patch on behalf of Bill? I see Bill as the
> author of the commit and I recall seeing this in some series he sent
> earlier [1] and this patch you've sent doesn't seem to be a v2.
>
> Let me know what your role is on this patch and why it has been
> separated out from Bill's series.
>
> It is entirely possible that I am lacking context. Please fill me in :)
>
She's been marsheling some of the strlcat patches I sent to the
mailing list. It's possible I sent a "v2" of all patches, whether
there were changes in them or not.
The patch series needs to be separated a bit because of Kees's
'seq_buf' changes, which will make some of the patches I sent
obsolete.
-bw
> > ---
> > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> > index 5ecc9ed4c44d..0d639eec689c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> > @@ -1155,8 +1155,7 @@ static void samsung_banks_node_get(struct device *dev, struct samsung_pinctrl_dr
> >
> > bank = d->pin_banks;
> > for (i = 0; i < d->nr_banks; ++i, ++bank) {
> > - strscpy(node_name, bank->name, sizeof(node_name));
> > - len = strlcat(node_name, suffix, sizeof(node_name));
> > + len = snprintf(node_name, sizeof(node_name), "%s%s", bank->name, suffix);
> > if (len >= sizeof(node_name)) {
> > dev_err(dev, "Too long pin bank name '%s', ignoring\n",
> > bank->name);
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260915081910.4142719-17-morbo@google.com/
>
> Thanks
> Justin
On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 2:43 PM Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2026 at 12:07:58PM -0700, Mariia Nikitash wrote:
> > From: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
> >
> > samsung_banks_node_get() constructs each pin bank node name by copying
> > bank->name with strscpy() and appending the suffix with strlcat().
> >
> > In preparation for removing the deprecated strlcat() API[1], format the
> > node name in a single snprintf() call, which preserves the existing
> > truncation check against sizeof(node_name).
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/370 [1]
> > Cc: codemender-patching+linux@google.com
> > Assisted-by: LLM
> > Signed-off-by: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Mariia Nikitash <nikitash.mariiaw@gmail.com>
>
> Are you forwarding this patch on behalf of Bill? I see Bill as the
> author of the commit and I recall seeing this in some series he sent
> earlier [1] and this patch you've sent doesn't seem to be a v2.
>
> Let me know what your role is on this patch and why it has been
> separated out from Bill's series.
>
> It is entirely possible that I am lacking context. Please fill me in :)
>
> > ---
> > drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> > index 5ecc9ed4c44d..0d639eec689c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-samsung.c
> > @@ -1155,8 +1155,7 @@ static void samsung_banks_node_get(struct device *dev, struct samsung_pinctrl_dr
> >
> > bank = d->pin_banks;
> > for (i = 0; i < d->nr_banks; ++i, ++bank) {
> > - strscpy(node_name, bank->name, sizeof(node_name));
> > - len = strlcat(node_name, suffix, sizeof(node_name));
> > + len = snprintf(node_name, sizeof(node_name), "%s%s", bank->name, suffix);
> > if (len >= sizeof(node_name)) {
> > dev_err(dev, "Too long pin bank name '%s', ignoring\n",
> > bank->name);
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260915081910.4142719-17-morbo@google.com/
>
> Thanks
> Justin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Use snprintf() to construct pin bank names
2026-09-28 22:00 ` Bill Wendling
@ 2026-09-28 22:07 ` Justin Stitt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Justin Stitt @ 2026-09-28 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bill Wendling
Cc: Mariia Nikitash, krzk, s.nawrocki, peter.griffin, linusw,
alim.akhtar, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, linux-gpio,
linux-kernel, linux-hardening, kees, aleksandr.loktionov,
codemender-patching+linux
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2026 at 3:01 PM Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> wrote:
> She's been marsheling some of the strlcat patches I sent to the
> mailing list. It's possible I sent a "v2" of all patches, whether
> there were changes in them or not.
>
> The patch series needs to be separated a bit because of Kees's
> 'seq_buf' changes, which will make some of the patches I sent
> obsolete.
ACK
>
> -bw
>
Thanks
Justin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-09-28 22:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-09-27 19:07 [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Use snprintf() to construct pin bank names Mariia Nikitash
2026-09-28 21:43 ` Justin Stitt
2026-09-28 22:00 ` Bill Wendling
2026-09-28 22:07 ` Justin Stitt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®