mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frank Li <Frank.li@oss.nxp.com>
To: Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kwilczynski@kernel.org, mani@kernel.org,
	bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org,
	thierry.reding@kernel.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
	kishon@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, vidyas@nvidia.com,
	cassel@kernel.org, den@valinux.co.jp, marco.crivellari@suse.com,
	andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] PCI: tegra194: Reject zero MSI interrupt number
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:44:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atjdzWgATowex95V@SMW015318> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021061349.1265704-11-mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>

On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 11:43:49AM +0530, Manikanta Maddireddy wrote:
> Reject interrupt number zero before computing BIT(irq - 1). The endpoint
> IRQ API uses interrupt numbers in the range 1-N, and existing EPF drivers
> already follow that convention. This is defensive validation rather than
> a correction to the MSI numbering used by those drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Maddireddy <mmaddireddy@nvidia.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>

> Changes V1 -> V2:
> - Retain only MSI interrupt-number-zero validation from v1 patch 10.
> - Rewrite the title and commit message around defensive MSI validation,
>   and remove the Fixes tag.
>
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> index 632ecab3c8ea..0f49ea6df8bc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
> @@ -2026,7 +2026,7 @@ static int tegra_pcie_ep_raise_intx_irq(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie, u16 irq)
>
>  static int tegra_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(struct tegra_pcie_dw *pcie, u16 irq)
>  {
> -	if (unlikely(irq > 32))
> +	if (unlikely(!irq || irq > 32))
>  		return -EINVAL;
>
>  	appl_writel(pcie, BIT(irq - 1), APPL_MSI_CTRL_1);
> --
> 2.34.1
>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-10-21 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-21  6:13 [PATCH v2 00/10] PCI: tegra194: Fix EP and Root Port corner cases Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] PCI: tegra194: Propagate REFCLK select GPIO errors Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21 15:14   ` Frank Li
2026-10-21  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] PCI: tegra194: Check core reset deassertion Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21 15:16   ` Frank Li
2026-10-21  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] PCI: tegra194: Fix Endpoint PERST# IRQ suspend race Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21 15:19   ` Frank Li
2026-10-21  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] PCI: tegra194: Do not skip no-link Root Port remove cleanup Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21 15:22   ` Frank Li
2026-10-21  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] PCI: tegra194: Check for 16 GT/s capability before programming Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21 15:24   ` Frank Li
2026-10-21  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] PCI: tegra194: Check for L1SS " Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21 15:28   ` Frank Li
2026-10-21  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] PCI: tegra194: Always disable Tegra234 Endpoint L1.2 Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21 15:32   ` Frank Li
2026-10-21  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] PCI: tegra194: Guard Endpoint PLL-off error path Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21 15:36   ` Frank Li
2026-10-21  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] PCI: tegra194: Balance core monitor clock on failures Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21 15:43   ` Frank Li
2026-10-21  6:13 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] PCI: tegra194: Reject zero MSI interrupt number Manikanta Maddireddy
2026-10-21 15:44   ` Frank Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atjdzWgATowex95V@SMW015318 \
    --to=frank.li@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=den@valinux.co.jp \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=marco.crivellari@suse.com \
    --cc=mmaddireddy@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@kernel.org \
    --cc=vidyas@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®