mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <pankaj.raghav@linux.dev>
To: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
	linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,  Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
	 Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,  Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>,
	Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@gmail.com>,
	 Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@kernel.org>,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] xfs: mark the inode preallocated for pNFS write layouts past EOF
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 14:41:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <atoEW7EUgDXKS7gh@quentin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020-xfs-pnfs-batch-v4-1-9230fa2ca4a4@samsung.com>

On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 12:08:44PM +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> xfs_fs_map_blocks() marks the inode XFS_DIFLAG_PREALLOC after it
> allocates blocks for a write layout, so that xfs_free_eofblocks() does
> not free blocks past EOF that a client may write to. But a write layout
> for a range past EOF where blocks are already allocated, such as the
> speculative preallocation of buffered writes, gets those blocks without
> an allocation, and the inode is not marked. blockgc, or the release of
> the file, then frees them without breaking the layout. The client still
> writes to them, and they may belong to another file by then.
> 
> With pynfs as the client, a file grown to 1 MiB by two buffered writes
> on the server had 960 KiB preallocated past EOF, and an RW LAYOUTGET for
> that range got it as one INVALID_DATA extent, without the inode being
> marked. About 300 seconds later, with the default
> speculative_prealloc_lifetime, blockgc freed those blocks while the
> layout was still held. When the client then wrote through the layout and
> sent LAYOUTCOMMIT, xfs_fs_commit_blocks() found a hole where the
> unwritten extent had been, and xfs_iomap_write_unwritten() allocated for
> it with no blocks reserved:
> 
>   XFS (nvme0n1): Corruption of in-memory data (0x8) detected at
>     xfs_trans_mod_sb+0x817/0x960 (fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c:351).
>     Shutting down filesystem.
>   ...
>    xfs_trans_mod_sb+0x817/0x960
>    xfs_alloc_vextent_finish+0x2e7/0x990
>    xfs_alloc_vextent_start_ag+0x25d/0x720
>    xfs_bmap_btalloc+0xdd2/0x1720
>    xfs_bmapi_allocate+0x197/0xf90
>    xfs_bmapi_write+0x4d0/0xb60
>    xfs_iomap_write_unwritten+0x307/0x7e0
>    xfs_fs_commit_blocks+0x1d9/0x630
>    nfsd4_block_proc_layoutcommit+0x5c2/0x7d0
>    nfsd4_layoutcommit+0x4b5/0xa20
> 
> The client got NFS4ERR_IO, in six runs out of six. When small files were
> written on the server after blockgc, with a sync first so that the freed
> extents were no longer busy, they got those blocks, and the client's
> write through the layout replaced 978944 bytes of their data before the
> LAYOUTCOMMIT. A LAYOUTGET and LAYOUTCOMMIT 30 seconds apart, before
> blockgc runs, leave the client's data in place.
> 
> Mark the inode also when a write mapping ends past EOF and nothing was
> allocated, the same way as for an allocation, before the blocks are
> handed out. With this, the same test keeps the blocks past blockgc, and
> the LAYOUTCOMMIT after 360 seconds succeeds with the data in place.
> 
> To share the update with the allocation case, set a local update_inode
> flag in both cases, call xfs_fs_map_update_inode() in one place below
> them, and move the log force into xfs_fs_map_update_inode().
> 
> Fixes: 527851124d10 ("xfs: implement pNFS export operations")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4de5356f-bc4d-4f1a-9c81-fce09b1b46fd@slotpi15m67
> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>

-- 
Pankaj

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-22 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-20  3:08 [PATCH v4 0/9] xfs: pNFS block layout fixes Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20  3:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] xfs: mark the inode preallocated for pNFS write layouts past EOF Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 12:41   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]
2026-10-20  3:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] xfs: add a flag to convert unwritten extents without allocating blocks Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 12:43   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-10-20  3:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] xfs: refuse a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT of a range without blocks Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20  3:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] xfs: clamp a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT extent before computing its end Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 12:44   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-10-20  3:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] xfs: limit the count of a pNFS write allocation to one extent Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 13:02   ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-10-20  3:08 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] xfs: clamp the pNFS layout range to the maximum file size Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20  3:08 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] xfs: take the invalidate lock while mapping a pNFS layout Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20  3:08 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] xfs: add datasync and log_flushed arguments to xfs_log_force_inode() Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20  3:08 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] xfs: make pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT stable the way fdatasync does Daejun Park via B4 Relay

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=atoEW7EUgDXKS7gh@quentin \
    --to=pankaj.raghav@linux.dev \
    --cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
    --cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=dgc@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergeybashirov@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®