From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <pankaj.raghav@linux.dev>
To: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>,
Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@gmail.com>,
Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] xfs: clamp the pNFS layout range to the maximum file size
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2026 13:10:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <attAFOxxELxAxoJo@quentin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020-xfs-pnfs-batch-v4-6-9230fa2ca4a4@samsung.com>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 12:08:49PM +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> xfs_fs_map_blocks() checks the range of a layout with
>
> if (offset > limit)
> goto out_unlock;
> if (offset > limit - length)
> length = limit - offset;
>
> limit - length is computed in u64, so a length larger than the limit
> wraps and the length is not clamped. nfsd passes the LAYOUTGET range
> through, and RFC 8881 lets a client ask for NFS4_UINT64_MAX bytes, for
> the rest of the file. offset + length then wraps to offset - 1, end_fsb
> rounds back to offset_fsb, and xfs_bmapi_read() maps nothing. For a read
> layout, xfs_bmbt_to_iomap() then gets an uninitialized imap: with a
> zeroed stack it logs "Access to block zero", marks the data fork sick
> and fails with -EFSCORRUPTED, and otherwise the mapping is whatever was
> on the stack and can reach the client. For a write layout,
> xfs_iomap_write_direct() is called with a count of zero, which trips an
> ASSERT with XFS_DEBUG. An offset of 2^63 or more, which nfsd accepts
> too, becomes negative in the loff_t argument and passes the first check.
>
> Reject a negative offset and an offset at the limit, and compare the
> length with what is left up to the limit, which cannot wrap once the
> offset is below it.
>
> With pynfs as the client, a READ LAYOUTGET for NFS4_UINT64_MAX bytes at
> offset 0 got NFS4ERR_IO, as did an RW one on an empty file, which also
> made nfsd warn
> about the non-standard errno -63, and a READ LAYOUTGET at offset 2^63
> got NFS4ERR_IO as well. With this patch and the previous one, the one at
> 2^63 gets NFS4ERR_INVAL, the RW one gets NFS4ERR_NOSPC after nfsd has
> allocated one extent after the other until fewer than
> XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN blocks were free, which left less than 8 GiB of the
> 32 GiB free, and the server logs nothing. The READ one gets NFS4ERR_INVAL
> as well: nfsd, which maps a layout one extent at a time since
> commit cc6c40e09d7b ("NFSD/blocklayout: Support multiple extents per
> LAYOUTGET"), asks again from the maximum file size on. An RW one on a
> file whose first 64 KiB are allocated, with a loga_maxcount that has
> room for one extent, is granted 0+65536.
>
> This depends on the previous patch. Without it, an RW LAYOUTGET to the
> end of the file, whose length is now clamped instead of wrapping, asks
> xfs_iomap_write_direct() for every block up to the maximum file size,
> which wraps the block reservation and shuts the filesystem down where it
> got NFS4ERR_IO before.
>
> Fixes: 527851124d10 ("xfs: implement pNFS export operations")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> ---
Looks good,
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
--
Pankaj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-23 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 3:08 [PATCH v4 0/9] xfs: pNFS block layout fixes Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] xfs: mark the inode preallocated for pNFS write layouts past EOF Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 12:41 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] xfs: add a flag to convert unwritten extents without allocating blocks Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 12:43 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] xfs: refuse a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT of a range without blocks Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] xfs: clamp a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT extent before computing its end Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 12:44 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] xfs: limit the count of a pNFS write allocation to one extent Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 13:02 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] xfs: clamp the pNFS layout range to the maximum file size Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-23 11:10 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] xfs: take the invalidate lock while mapping a pNFS layout Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] xfs: add datasync and log_flushed arguments to xfs_log_force_inode() Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] xfs: make pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT stable the way fdatasync does Daejun Park via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=attAFOxxELxAxoJo@quentin \
--to=pankaj.raghav@linux.dev \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergeybashirov@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®