From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" <pankaj.raghav@linux.dev>
To: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Dave Chinner <dgc@kernel.org>, Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>,
Sergey Bashirov <sergeybashirov@gmail.com>,
Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@kernel.org>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/9] xfs: clamp a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT extent before computing its end
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 14:44:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <atoFF7QhbenJOFUl@quentin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020-xfs-pnfs-batch-v4-4-9230fa2ca4a4@samsung.com>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2026 at 12:08:47PM +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> xfs_fs_commit_blocks() clamps the end of each committed extent to the
> file size, but computes the end as offset + length first. A length
> from the client can make that sum wrap around, and the loop then
> passes the client's length, unclamped, to xfs_iomap_write_unwritten().
> The range wraps there as well, and xfs_bmapi_write() maps nothing.
> Before the previous two patches, that failed an assertion on XFS_DEBUG
> kernels, which is a BUG with XFS_ASSERT_FATAL, and otherwise returned
> -ENOSR, which nfsd warns about as a non-standard errno. With
> XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT_ONLY, the LAYOUTCOMMIT fails with -EIO and converts
> nothing, even when every block up to the size is allocated.
>
> With pynfs as the client and an RW layout for the first 64 KiB of a
> 2 MiB sparse file, a LAYOUTCOMMIT of 2^64 - 4 KiB at 4 KiB got
> NFS4ERR_IO, "nfsd: non-standard errno: -63" and a WARNING, or the
> assertion on XFS_DEBUG. With the previous two patches, it gets
> NFS4ERR_IO and the laid-out range stays unwritten.
>
> Clamp the length to what is left below the size before adding it to
> the offset. The extent then ends at the size, its allocated part is
> converted, and the LAYOUTCOMMIT gets NFS4ERR_IO at the hole after it.
>
> Fixes: 527851124d10 ("xfs: implement pNFS export operations")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com>
--
Pankaj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 3:08 [PATCH v4 0/9] xfs: pNFS block layout fixes Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] xfs: mark the inode preallocated for pNFS write layouts past EOF Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 12:41 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] xfs: add a flag to convert unwritten extents without allocating blocks Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 12:43 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] xfs: refuse a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT of a range without blocks Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] xfs: clamp a pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT extent before computing its end Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 12:44 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) [this message]
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] xfs: limit the count of a pNFS write allocation to one extent Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-22 13:02 ` Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] xfs: clamp the pNFS layout range to the maximum file size Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] xfs: take the invalidate lock while mapping a pNFS layout Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] xfs: add datasync and log_flushed arguments to xfs_log_force_inode() Daejun Park via B4 Relay
2026-10-20 3:08 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] xfs: make pNFS LAYOUTCOMMIT stable the way fdatasync does Daejun Park via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=atoFF7QhbenJOFUl@quentin \
--to=pankaj.raghav@linux.dev \
--cc=Dai.Ngo@oracle.com \
--cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
--cc=dgc@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergeybashirov@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®