* [PATCH 0/2] mm: optimize HugeTLB bootmem hugepage init
@ 2026-11-05 12:06 Li Zhe
2026-11-05 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_page_from_template() Li Zhe
2026-11-05 12:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init Li Zhe
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Li Zhe @ 2026-11-05 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: muchun.song, osalvador, david, akpm, rppt, apopple, balbirs
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Li Zhe
This series speeds up the fallback initialization path for HugeTLB tail
struct pages during boot-time hugepage allocation, when HugeTLB vmemmap
optimization (HVO) is unavailable or fails.
Patch 1 factors the existing ZONE_DEVICE template-copy operation into
memmap_init_page_from_template().
Patch 2 reuses that helper in hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap():
initialize the first tail page normally, copy it into a local template,
then initialize the remaining tail pages by refreshing only PFN-dependent
fields before copying the template.
In the earlier discussion, Mike asked whether the same kind of
template-based initialization also helps the ordinary struct page
initialization path:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/akfB6Qe-jKDEMUxz@kernel.org/
I tested that direction as well, but did not see a measurable benefit
for ordinary struct page initialization. The measurable improvement I
could find is in the HugeTLB bootmem hugepage tail path, where gigantic
pages can require initializing a large number of tail struct pages when
HVO does not cover the allocation.
Tested on an arm64 QEMU/KVM guest with 4K base pages and 64 boot-time 1G
hugepages. HVO is unavailable on arm64 in v7.4-rc1, so the fallback tail
initialization path is exercised.
Results averaged over five boots, measured with a temporary
jiffies-based printk:
base: 318.4 ms
with this patch: 202.4 ms
This is a 36.43% reduction in the measured fallback tail initialization
time. The temporary measurement instrumentation is not part of this
series.
Li Zhe (2):
mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_page_from_template()
mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init
mm/hugetlb.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
mm/mm_init.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
mm/mm_init.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_page_from_template()
2026-11-05 12:06 [PATCH 0/2] mm: optimize HugeTLB bootmem hugepage init Li Zhe
@ 2026-11-05 12:06 ` Li Zhe
2026-11-06 10:34 ` Balbir Singh
2026-11-05 12:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init Li Zhe
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Li Zhe @ 2026-11-05 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: muchun.song, osalvador, david, akpm, rppt, apopple, balbirs
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Li Zhe
ZONE_DEVICE memmap initialization already uses a reusable struct page
template when initializing compound tail pages. The template mostly
contains invariant state, but a few fields still depend on the target
PFN and must be refreshed before copying the template into each
destination struct page.
Factor that operation into memmap_init_page_from_template() so other
boot-time memmap initialization paths can reuse the same helper.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
---
mm/mm_init.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
mm/mm_init.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
index 2a0e782a151d..495e20fbdec0 100644
--- a/mm/mm_init.c
+++ b/mm/mm_init.c
@@ -625,6 +625,17 @@ void __meminit __init_single_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
vmemmap_optimization_verify_zone(page);
}
+void __meminit memmap_init_page_from_template(struct page *page,
+ unsigned long pfn, unsigned long zone, struct page *template)
+{
+ set_page_section_from_pfn(template, pfn);
+#ifdef WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL
+ if (!is_highmem_idx(zone))
+ set_page_address(template, __va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT));
+#endif
+ memcpy_nontemporal(page, template, sizeof(*page));
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
/*
* During memory init memblocks map pfns to nids. The search is expensive and
@@ -1073,17 +1084,6 @@ static void __ref __init_zone_device_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
}
}
-static void zone_device_page_init_from_template(struct page *page,
- unsigned long pfn, struct page *template)
-{
- set_page_section_from_pfn(template, pfn);
-#ifdef WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL
- if (!is_highmem_idx(ZONE_DEVICE))
- set_page_address(template, __va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT));
-#endif
- memcpy_nontemporal(page, template, sizeof(*page));
-}
-
/*
* With compound page geometry and when struct pages are stored in ram most
* tail pages are reused. Consequently, the amount of unique struct pages to
@@ -1136,8 +1136,8 @@ static void __ref memmap_init_compound(struct page *head,
/* Initialize the remaining tail pages from template. */
for (pfn = head_pfn + 2; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++)
- zone_device_page_init_from_template(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn,
- &template);
+ memmap_init_page_from_template(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn,
+ ZONE_DEVICE, &template);
prep_compound_head(head, order);
}
@@ -1192,7 +1192,8 @@ void __ref memmap_init_zone_device(struct zone *zone,
for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += pfns_per_compound) {
page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
- zone_device_page_init_from_template(page, pfn, &template);
+ memmap_init_page_from_template(page, pfn, ZONE_DEVICE,
+ &template);
if (IS_ALIGNED(pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION))
cond_resched();
diff --git a/mm/mm_init.h b/mm/mm_init.h
index 0034e37dbabd..22c465122b47 100644
--- a/mm/mm_init.h
+++ b/mm/mm_init.h
@@ -111,5 +111,7 @@ void memblock_free_all(void);
void __meminit __init_single_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
unsigned long zone, int nid);
+void __meminit memmap_init_page_from_template(struct page *page,
+ unsigned long pfn, unsigned long zone, struct page *template);
#endif /* __MM_MM_INIT_H */
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init
2026-11-05 12:06 [PATCH 0/2] mm: optimize HugeTLB bootmem hugepage init Li Zhe
2026-11-05 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_page_from_template() Li Zhe
@ 2026-11-05 12:06 ` Li Zhe
2026-11-06 10:23 ` Balbir Singh
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Li Zhe @ 2026-11-05 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: muchun.song, osalvador, david, akpm, rppt, apopple, balbirs
Cc: linux-mm, linux-kernel, Li Zhe
Boot-time HugeTLB allocation has to initialize tail struct pages itself
when HugeTLB vmemmap optimization (HVO) is unavailable or fails. For
gigantic pages, this can cover a large number of tail pages. Most state
installed by __init_single_page() and prep_compound_tail() is identical
for every tail page in the same huge page; only PFN-dependent fields
need refreshing.
Initialize the first tail page normally, copy it into a local template,
then initialize the remaining tails from that template with
memmap_init_page_from_template(). This avoids repeatedly doing the full
__init_single_page() and prep_compound_tail() sequence for state that is
identical across tail pages in the same huge page.
On an arm64 QEMU/KVM guest using 4K pages and 64 boot-time 1G hugepages
(HVO unavailable on arm64 in v7.4-rc1), the measured fallback tail
initialization time improved by 36.43%, measured with a temporary
jiffies-based printk modeled after the existing timing in
memmap_init_zone_device():
base: 318.4 ms
with this patch: 202.4 ms
Signed-off-by: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
---
mm/hugetlb.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
index da5d04edf7c1..987f16a5ea27 100644
--- a/mm/hugetlb.c
+++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
@@ -3219,19 +3219,32 @@ static void __init hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap(struct folio *folio,
enum zone_type zone = folio_zonenum(folio);
int nid = folio_nid(folio);
struct page *page = folio_page(folio, start_page_number);
+ struct page template;
unsigned long head_pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
unsigned long pfn, end_pfn = head_pfn + end_page_number;
unsigned int order = huge_page_order(h);
+ if (start_page_number >= end_page_number)
+ return;
+
/*
* As we marked all tail pages with memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(),
* we must initialize them ourselves here.
*/
- for (pfn = head_pfn + start_page_number; pfn < end_pfn; page++, pfn++) {
- __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid);
- prep_compound_tail(page, &folio->page, order);
- set_page_count(page, 0);
- }
+ pfn = head_pfn + start_page_number;
+
+ /*
+ * Seed a template from the first real tail page and refresh only
+ * PFN-dependent fields before copying it.
+ */
+ __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid);
+ prep_compound_tail(page, &folio->page, order);
+ set_page_count(page, 0);
+ memcpy(&template, page, sizeof(template));
+
+ for (pfn++; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++)
+ memmap_init_page_from_template(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, zone,
+ &template);
}
static void __init hugetlb_folio_init_vmemmap(struct folio *folio,
--
2.20.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init
2026-11-05 12:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init Li Zhe
@ 2026-11-06 10:23 ` Balbir Singh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Balbir Singh @ 2026-11-06 10:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Zhe
Cc: muchun.song, osalvador, david, akpm, rppt, apopple, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 08:06:15PM +0800, Li Zhe wrote:
> Boot-time HugeTLB allocation has to initialize tail struct pages itself
> when HugeTLB vmemmap optimization (HVO) is unavailable or fails. For
> gigantic pages, this can cover a large number of tail pages. Most state
> installed by __init_single_page() and prep_compound_tail() is identical
> for every tail page in the same huge page; only PFN-dependent fields
> need refreshing.
>
> Initialize the first tail page normally, copy it into a local template,
> then initialize the remaining tails from that template with
> memmap_init_page_from_template(). This avoids repeatedly doing the full
> __init_single_page() and prep_compound_tail() sequence for state that is
> identical across tail pages in the same huge page.
>
> On an arm64 QEMU/KVM guest using 4K pages and 64 boot-time 1G hugepages
> (HVO unavailable on arm64 in v7.4-rc1), the measured fallback tail
> initialization time improved by 36.43%, measured with a temporary
> jiffies-based printk modeled after the existing timing in
> memmap_init_zone_device():
>
> base: 318.4 ms
> with this patch: 202.4 ms
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index da5d04edf7c1..987f16a5ea27 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -3219,19 +3219,32 @@ static void __init hugetlb_folio_init_tail_vmemmap(struct folio *folio,
> enum zone_type zone = folio_zonenum(folio);
> int nid = folio_nid(folio);
> struct page *page = folio_page(folio, start_page_number);
> + struct page template;
> unsigned long head_pfn = folio_pfn(folio);
> unsigned long pfn, end_pfn = head_pfn + end_page_number;
> unsigned int order = huge_page_order(h);
>
> + if (start_page_number >= end_page_number)
> + return;
> +
Can this actually happen?
> /*
> * As we marked all tail pages with memblock_reserved_mark_noinit(),
> * we must initialize them ourselves here.
> */
> - for (pfn = head_pfn + start_page_number; pfn < end_pfn; page++, pfn++) {
> - __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid);
> - prep_compound_tail(page, &folio->page, order);
> - set_page_count(page, 0);
> - }
> + pfn = head_pfn + start_page_number;
> +
> + /*
> + * Seed a template from the first real tail page and refresh only
> + * PFN-dependent fields before copying it.
> + */
> + __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid);
> + prep_compound_tail(page, &folio->page, order);
> + set_page_count(page, 0);
> + memcpy(&template, page, sizeof(template));
Do we need a separate template and page?
> +
> + for (pfn++; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++)
> + memmap_init_page_from_template(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, zone,
> + &template);
> }
>
> static void __init hugetlb_folio_init_vmemmap(struct folio *folio,
Acked-by: Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_page_from_template()
2026-11-05 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_page_from_template() Li Zhe
@ 2026-11-06 10:34 ` Balbir Singh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Balbir Singh @ 2026-11-06 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Li Zhe
Cc: muchun.song, osalvador, david, akpm, rppt, apopple, linux-mm,
linux-kernel
On Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 08:06:14PM +0800, Li Zhe wrote:
> ZONE_DEVICE memmap initialization already uses a reusable struct page
> template when initializing compound tail pages. The template mostly
> contains invariant state, but a few fields still depend on the target
> PFN and must be refreshed before copying the template into each
> destination struct page.
>
> Factor that operation into memmap_init_page_from_template() so other
> boot-time memmap initialization paths can reuse the same helper.
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhe <lizhe.67@bytedance.com>
> ---
> mm/mm_init.c | 29 +++++++++++++++--------------
> mm/mm_init.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
> index 2a0e782a151d..495e20fbdec0 100644
> --- a/mm/mm_init.c
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.c
> @@ -625,6 +625,17 @@ void __meminit __init_single_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> vmemmap_optimization_verify_zone(page);
> }
>
> +void __meminit memmap_init_page_from_template(struct page *page,
> + unsigned long pfn, unsigned long zone, struct page *template)
> +{
> + set_page_section_from_pfn(template, pfn);
> +#ifdef WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL
> + if (!is_highmem_idx(zone))
> + set_page_address(template, __va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT));
> +#endif
> + memcpy_nontemporal(page, template, sizeof(*page));
> +}
> +
Can we make the template a const? Why can't we do
void __meminit memmap_init_page_from_template(struct page *page,
unsigned long pfn, unsigned long zone,
const struct page *template)
{
memcpy_nontemporal(page, template, sizeof(*page));
set_page_section_from_pfn(page, pfn);
#ifdef WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL
if (!is_highmem_idx(zone))
set_page_address(page, __va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT));
#endif
That way we don't update template once it is set, if template is r/o,
then we don't need both first page and template in the caller to
be different.
> #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> /*
> * During memory init memblocks map pfns to nids. The search is expensive and
> @@ -1073,17 +1084,6 @@ static void __ref __init_zone_device_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> }
> }
>
> -static void zone_device_page_init_from_template(struct page *page,
> - unsigned long pfn, struct page *template)
> -{
> - set_page_section_from_pfn(template, pfn);
> -#ifdef WANT_PAGE_VIRTUAL
> - if (!is_highmem_idx(ZONE_DEVICE))
> - set_page_address(template, __va(pfn << PAGE_SHIFT));
> -#endif
> - memcpy_nontemporal(page, template, sizeof(*page));
> -}
> -
> /*
> * With compound page geometry and when struct pages are stored in ram most
> * tail pages are reused. Consequently, the amount of unique struct pages to
> @@ -1136,8 +1136,8 @@ static void __ref memmap_init_compound(struct page *head,
>
> /* Initialize the remaining tail pages from template. */
> for (pfn = head_pfn + 2; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++)
> - zone_device_page_init_from_template(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn,
> - &template);
> + memmap_init_page_from_template(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn,
> + ZONE_DEVICE, &template);
> prep_compound_head(head, order);
> }
>
> @@ -1192,7 +1192,8 @@ void __ref memmap_init_zone_device(struct zone *zone,
> for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += pfns_per_compound) {
> page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>
> - zone_device_page_init_from_template(page, pfn, &template);
> + memmap_init_page_from_template(page, pfn, ZONE_DEVICE,
> + &template);
>
> if (IS_ALIGNED(pfn, PAGES_PER_SECTION))
> cond_resched();
> diff --git a/mm/mm_init.h b/mm/mm_init.h
> index 0034e37dbabd..22c465122b47 100644
> --- a/mm/mm_init.h
> +++ b/mm/mm_init.h
> @@ -111,5 +111,7 @@ void memblock_free_all(void);
>
> void __meminit __init_single_page(struct page *page, unsigned long pfn,
> unsigned long zone, int nid);
> +void __meminit memmap_init_page_from_template(struct page *page,
> + unsigned long pfn, unsigned long zone, struct page *template);
>
> #endif /* __MM_MM_INIT_H */
> --
Balbir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-06 10:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-11-05 12:06 [PATCH 0/2] mm: optimize HugeTLB bootmem hugepage init Li Zhe
2026-11-05 12:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mm_init: factor out memmap_init_page_from_template() Li Zhe
2026-11-06 10:34 ` Balbir Singh
2026-11-05 12:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: optimize bootmem hugepage tail vmemmap init Li Zhe
2026-11-06 10:23 ` Balbir Singh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®