From: Peter Chen <peter.chen@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Faisal Hassan <faisal.hassan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com>,
Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sriram Dash <sriram.dash@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] usb: dwc3: qcom: Support broken suspend for SA8255P
Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2026 19:32:12 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <augEPIcTyepgTxFW@hu-petche-lv.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a4bdffa9101fa81e4511d84c5a3ddd0b972efe2.1793212717.git.faisal.hassan@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 26-10-29 00:29:35, Faisal Hassan wrote:
> During APPS Suspend, the clock controller unit disables all clocks
> to the CPU and subsystems, causing the controller to enter the
> Power-On Reset (POR) state. This results in the loss of
> Qscratch programming.
>
> Upon APPS Resume, the USB controller does not have the proper
> PIPE_UTMI_CLK_SEL or VBUS_VALID. Hence, if only the High-Speed
> PHY is used for a controller capable of SuperSpeed operations,
> the controller will assume it should use the USB3 PHY and not
> the HS PHY as configured before APPS Suspend. This behavior
> disrupts the normal operation of the USB controller. Similarly,
> if the controller was operating in device mode prior to
> APPS suspend, and VBUS_VALID signal is not set after APPS resume,
> this will cause the PHYs to transition into the suspend state.
> This behavior disrupts the normal operation of the USB controller.
>
> Address the issues by ensuring that the PIPE_UTMI_CLK_SEL and
> VBUS_VALID are handled properly after the system resumes from
> APPS Suspend. This is crucial for maintaining the correct
> operational state of the USB controller and preventing
> unintended suspensions of the PHYs.
>
> Also, as the controller is starting from POR state, make
> sure the controller Reset is performed.
>
> Because the controller is reset on every system resume, the
> Qscratch restore is done whether or not wakeup was enabled, and
> dwc3 core is told via needs_full_reinit to fully re-initialize the
> core on system resume even in host mode with wakeup enabled. Wakeup
> on this platform comes from the PHY interrupts routed through PDC,
> not from the controller staying powered. VBUS_VALID is only forced
> outside host mode, matching what probe does.
>
> The XHCI controller is reset by the same event, so also set the
> xhci_reset_on_resume dwc3 property. dwc3 passes it on to the xhci-plat
> device as xhci-reset-on-resume-quirk, which makes xhci-plat set
> XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME.
>
> Also make the .prepare callback return 0 on these platforms. A
> runtime-suspended device in device mode would otherwise be left in
> place across system sleep (direct_complete), skipping the system
> resume callback and with it the reset and Qscratch restore.
Faisal, there are several issues in this patch, would you try to split them?
- XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME quirk support for dwc3
- PIPE_UTMI_CLK_SEL restore after system resume, there is a similar submission recently [1]
- VBUS override restore after system resume
- The improvement for system resume dues to HW POR or lost of power.
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20261027-dwc3-utmi-resume-v1-1-ca9f0aa65783@gmail.com/
>
> struct dwc3_qcom {
> struct device *dev;
> void __iomem *qscratch_base;
> @@ -86,6 +90,13 @@ struct dwc3_qcom {
> struct icc_path *icc_path_apps;
>
> enum usb_role current_role;
> +
> + bool broken_suspend;
> + bool ignore_pipe_clk;
> +};
> +
> +static const struct dwc3_qcom_priv_data sa8255p_dwc3_qcom_priv_data = {
> + .broken_suspend = true,
> };
Why you consider it is "broken", or is it a normal resume recovery due to lost of status
for controller and PHY? Why other SoCs don't need it?
> static int dwc3_qcom_prepare(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct dwc3 *dwc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct dwc3_qcom *qcom = to_dwc3_qcom(dwc);
> +
> + /*
> + * The controller loses power across system suspend, so the system
> + * resume callback must always run to reset and reprogram it. Don't
> + * let the PM core leave a runtime-suspended device as-is.
> + */
> + if (qcom->broken_suspend)
> + return 0;
Why we need this? I see dwc3 core do dwc3_core_init_for_resume at device mode
during the resume.
>
> return dwc3_pm_prepare(dwc);
> }
--
Thanks,
Peter Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1793212717.git.faisal.hassan@oss.qualcomm.com>
2026-10-28 18:59 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] usb: dwc3: qcom: Keep wakeup IRQ enable/disable balanced on failed resume Faisal Hassan
2026-10-30 9:24 ` Peter Chen
2026-10-30 11:24 ` Faisal Hassan
2026-11-02 2:21 ` Peter Chen
2026-10-28 18:59 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] usb: dwc3: qcom: Distinguish PM and runtime suspend/resume paths Faisal Hassan
2026-11-02 4:47 ` Krishna Kurapati
2026-10-28 18:59 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] dt-bindings: usb: Add qcom,sa8255p-dwc3 for firmware-managed resources Faisal Hassan
2026-10-29 8:02 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-28 18:59 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] usb: host: xhci-plat: Support XHCI_RESET_ON_RESUME via device property Faisal Hassan
2026-10-30 9:29 ` Peter Chen
2026-10-28 18:59 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] usb: dwc3: qcom: Support broken suspend for SA8255P Faisal Hassan
2026-11-02 3:32 ` Peter Chen [this message]
2026-10-28 18:59 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] usb: dwc3: qcom: Support firmware-managed resource states for power management Faisal Hassan
2026-11-02 6:20 ` Peter Chen
2026-10-28 18:59 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] usb: dwc3: qcom: Enable VBUS override at probe for default peripheral role Faisal Hassan
2026-11-02 6:36 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=augEPIcTyepgTxFW@hu-petche-lv.qualcomm.com \
--to=peter.chen@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com \
--cc=faisal.hassan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=krishna.kurapati@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sriram.dash@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®