From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
To: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Radu Rendec <radu@rendec.net>,
Timothy Hayes <timothy.hayes@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Clean the allocated linear device table size
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2026 15:46:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auiiK0ksqPMbHAmX@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102-host_gicv5_fixes-v1-9-743b61626fc5@arm.com>
On Mon, Nov 02, 2026 at 01:33:02PM +0000, Sascha Bischoff wrote:
> When the linear device table exceeds the kmalloc limit, the driver
> caps the DeviceID width before allocation but keeps the original size
> for cache maintenance. On a noncoherent ITS, this cleans beyond the
> allocated table.
>
> Recalculate the size after capping the DeviceID width.
>
> Fixes: 57d72196dfc85 ("irqchip/gic-v5: Add GICv5 ITS support")
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Bischoff <sascha.bischoff@arm.com>
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c
> index 4de07bbdc4923..c0f3982229194 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v5-its.c
> @@ -601,6 +601,7 @@ static int gicv5_its_alloc_devtab_linear(struct gicv5_its_chip_data *its,
> pr_warn("Limiting device ID bits from %u to %u\n",
> device_id_bits, device_id_cap);
> device_id_bits = device_id_cap;
> + sz = BIT_ULL(device_id_bits) * sizeof(*devtab);
> }
>
Or sz = KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE;
that's what we are doing after all.
I wonder whether moving:
sz = BIT_ULL(device_id_bits) * sizeof(*devtab);
after the capping out of the if and do:
if (BIT_ULL(device_id_bits) * sizeof(*devtab) > KMALLOC_MAX_SIZE)
to check whether mem alloc should be capped makes this any easier
to read.
Regardless, this patch is a fix and it is right to make it as small
as possible:
Acked-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
> devtab = kcalloc(BIT(device_id_bits), sizeof(*devtab), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 13:32 [PATCH 00/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Fix misc IRS and ITS host driver issues Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 13:32 ` [PATCH 01/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Reject SPIs not backed by an IRS Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 13:50 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-11-02 13:32 ` [PATCH 02/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Only set IRS DPS when 1ofN routing is supported Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 14:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-11-02 13:32 ` [PATCH 03/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Serialise IRS synchronisation requests Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 13:32 ` [PATCH 04/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Serialise ITS invalidation commands Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 15:56 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-11-02 13:32 ` [PATCH 05/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Use linear DT and ITT when L2 covers all IDs Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 13:32 ` [PATCH 06/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Honour ACPI ITS noncoherent flag Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 14:13 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-11-02 13:33 ` [PATCH 07/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Use firmware node name in ITS warning Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 14:21 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-11-02 13:33 ` [PATCH 08/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Invalidate ITS device cache before freeing ITT Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 15:22 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2026-11-02 13:33 ` [PATCH 09/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Clean the allocated linear device table size Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 14:46 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2026-11-02 13:33 ` [PATCH 10/10] irqchip/gic-v5: Release ITS MMIO region on DT probe failure Sascha Bischoff
2026-11-02 14:54 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auiiK0ksqPMbHAmX@red-moon \
--to=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=radu@rendec.net \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=sascha.bischoff@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=timothy.hayes@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®