From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
To: aiyengar1990@gmail.com
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: power domain and clock of the RK3588 PCIe SMMU
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 16:13:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <avMzjsG_Zl8Gh0wJ@venus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110-smmu-v3-pcie-pd-v1-0-628819ca44b9@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3149 bytes --]
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 07:11:47AM +0000, Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay wrote:
> The MMU-600 in front of the PCIe controllers of the Rockchip RK3588
> (mmu600_pcie) is enabled for every RK3588 board, but its node describes
> neither the power domain it lives in (RK3588_PD_PCIE) nor its clock
> (ACLK_MMU_PCIE). Both are held by any enabled PCIe controller, which is
> why nobody noticed: on a board that enables no PCIe controller in that
> domain (an Orange Pi 5 with its M.2 slot in SATA mode, or any RK3588
> board without PCIe), genpd powers the domain off and the clock framework
> gates the clock as unused after boot, while arm-smmu-v3 stays bound.
> At reboot, arm_smmu_device_shutdown() then writes CR0 and polls CR0ACK on
> the dead block, the interconnect stalls, "reboot: Restarting system" is
> never reached and the board only comes back ~90 s later when the
> watchdog fires.
>
> Patches 1 and 2 allow power-domains and clocks in the arm,smmu-v3
> binding (arm,smmu.yaml already allows both for the earlier SMMUs).
> Patch 3 makes the driver get and enable the clocks of its firmware node
> before the first register access, for as long as it is bound; nodes
> without clocks (and ACPI/IORT systems) are unaffected. Patches 4 and 5
> describe the power domain and the clock in rk3588-base.dtsi. Both DT
> patches are needed: with the power domain alone the clock is still
> gated and the shutdown still hangs.
>
> Related: Pranjal Shrivastava's "iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add runtime PM
> support" v11 (2026-09-29, 20260929034510.2023173-1-praan@google.com,
> not merged) adds pm_domain-based runtime PM and resumes the SMMU around
> shutdown, but has no clock handling. This series is compatible with it:
> once it lands, the clocks from patch 3 should move into its runtime
> suspend/resume callbacks.
>
> Tested on an Orange Pi 5 (RK3588S) with the M.2 slot in SATA mode and
> the root filesystem on the SATA SSD, where every reboot used to hang:
> three consecutive reboots printed "reboot: Restarting system" and the
> boot loader started 0.6 s later (previously ~89 s, from the watchdog);
> clk_summary shows aclk_mmu_pcie enabled with iommu@fc900000 as consumer
> and pm_genpd_summary shows PD_PCIE on; the SMMU probes as before and
> SATA keeps running at 6.0 Gbps without errors. With patch 4 alone
> (power domain, clock still gated) the reboot still hung at
> "arm-smmu-v3 fc900000.iommu: shutdown" on the serial console. Boards
> with PCIe enabled are already in the state these patches describe.
>
> This series was developed with Claude (Anthropic) as a coding assistant:
> it wrote the code and the commit messages, and I reviewed and tested
> every change as described above.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Iyengar <aiyengar1990@gmail.com>
> ---
While at it, maybe also add the reset line (SRST_A_MMU_PCIE on
RK3588) to make the hardware description complete? See also the
MMU-600 TRM, that there is one clock and one reset line:
Link: https://support.arm.com/documentation/100310/0202/Signal-descriptions/Clock-and-reset-signals?lang=en
Greetings,
-- Sebastian
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-10 7:11 Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 7:11 ` [PATCH 1/5] dt-bindings: iommu: arm,smmu-v3: allow a power domain Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 14:51 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-10 7:11 ` [PATCH 2/5] dt-bindings: iommu: arm,smmu-v3: allow clocks Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 14:55 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-10 7:11 ` [PATCH 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: enable optional clocks Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 14:53 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-10 7:11 ` [PATCH 4/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: add the PCIe power domain to the RK3588 PCIe SMMU Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 15:00 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-10 7:11 ` [PATCH 5/5] arm64: dts: rockchip: add the clock of " Arun Iyengar via B4 Relay
2026-11-10 15:07 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-11-10 8:40 ` [PATCH 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: power domain and " Shawn Lin
2026-11-10 8:49 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-11-10 15:13 ` Sebastian Reichel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=avMzjsG_Zl8Gh0wJ@venus \
--to=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
--cc=aiyengar1990@gmail.com \
--cc=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®