* [PATCH 1/1] r8169: add module parameter aspm_en_force
@ 2025-03-24 12:55 Crag Wang
2025-03-24 13:27 ` Heiner Kallweit
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Crag Wang @ 2025-03-24 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiner Kallweit, nic_swsd, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller,
Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: crag.wang, dell.client.kernel, Crag Wang, netdev, linux-kernel
ASPM is disabled by default and is enabled if the chip register is
pre-configured, as explained in #c217ab7.
A module parameter is being added to the driver to allow users to
override the default setting. This allows users to opt in and forcefully
enable or disable ASPM power-saving mode.
-1: default unset
0: ASPM disabled forcefully
1: ASPM enabled forcefully
Signed-off-by: Crag Wang <crag0715@gmail.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
index 53e541ddb439..161b2f2edf52 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
@@ -35,6 +35,10 @@
#include "r8169.h"
#include "r8169_firmware.h"
+static int aspm_en_force = -1;
+module_param(aspm_en_force, int, 0444);
+MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm_en_force, "r8169: An integer, set 1 to force enable link ASPM");
+
#define FIRMWARE_8168D_1 "rtl_nic/rtl8168d-1.fw"
#define FIRMWARE_8168D_2 "rtl_nic/rtl8168d-2.fw"
#define FIRMWARE_8168E_1 "rtl_nic/rtl8168e-1.fw"
@@ -5398,6 +5402,14 @@ static void rtl_init_mac_address(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
/* register is set if system vendor successfully tested ASPM 1.2 */
static bool rtl_aspm_is_safe(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
{
+ if (aspm_en_force == 0) {
+ dev_info(tp_to_dev(tp), "ASPM disabled forcefully");
+ return false;
+ } else if (aspm_en_force > 0) {
+ dev_info(tp_to_dev(tp), "ASPM enabled forcefully");
+ return true;
+ }
+
if (tp->mac_version >= RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_61 &&
r8168_mac_ocp_read(tp, 0xc0b2) & 0xf)
return true;
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] r8169: add module parameter aspm_en_force
2025-03-24 12:55 [PATCH 1/1] r8169: add module parameter aspm_en_force Crag Wang
@ 2025-03-24 13:27 ` Heiner Kallweit
2025-04-21 8:20 ` Crag Wang
[not found] ` <CAP-8N0jAjeY8Wthta1yS8Hs57KKt6HyFWpYM6=q1t+jxF_sY1A@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2025-03-24 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Crag Wang, nic_swsd, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni
Cc: crag.wang, dell.client.kernel, netdev, linux-kernel
On 24.03.2025 13:55, Crag Wang wrote:
> ASPM is disabled by default and is enabled if the chip register is
> pre-configured, as explained in #c217ab7.
>
> A module parameter is being added to the driver to allow users to
> override the default setting. This allows users to opt in and forcefully
> enable or disable ASPM power-saving mode.
>
> -1: default unset
> 0: ASPM disabled forcefully
> 1: ASPM enabled forcefully
>
> Signed-off-by: Crag Wang <crag0715@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> index 53e541ddb439..161b2f2edf52 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,10 @@
> #include "r8169.h"
> #include "r8169_firmware.h"
>
> +static int aspm_en_force = -1;
> +module_param(aspm_en_force, int, 0444);
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(aspm_en_force, "r8169: An integer, set 1 to force enable link ASPM");
> +
> #define FIRMWARE_8168D_1 "rtl_nic/rtl8168d-1.fw"
> #define FIRMWARE_8168D_2 "rtl_nic/rtl8168d-2.fw"
> #define FIRMWARE_8168E_1 "rtl_nic/rtl8168e-1.fw"
> @@ -5398,6 +5402,14 @@ static void rtl_init_mac_address(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
> /* register is set if system vendor successfully tested ASPM 1.2 */
> static bool rtl_aspm_is_safe(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
> {
> + if (aspm_en_force == 0) {
> + dev_info(tp_to_dev(tp), "ASPM disabled forcefully");
> + return false;
> + } else if (aspm_en_force > 0) {
> + dev_info(tp_to_dev(tp), "ASPM enabled forcefully");
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> if (tp->mac_version >= RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_61 &&
> r8168_mac_ocp_read(tp, 0xc0b2) & 0xf)
> return true;
Adding module parameters is discouraged.
Also note that you have the option already to re-activate ASPM, you can use the
standard PCI sysfs attributes under /sys/class/net/<if>/device/link for this.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/1] r8169: add module parameter aspm_en_force
2025-03-24 13:27 ` Heiner Kallweit
@ 2025-04-21 8:20 ` Crag Wang
[not found] ` <CAP-8N0jAjeY8Wthta1yS8Hs57KKt6HyFWpYM6=q1t+jxF_sY1A@mail.gmail.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Crag Wang @ 2025-04-21 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Heiner Kallweit
Cc: nic_swsd, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, crag.wang, dell.client.kernel,
netdev, linux-kernel
>
> Adding module parameters is discouraged.
> Also note that you have the option already to re-activate ASPM, you can use the
> standard PCI sysfs attributes under /sys/class/net/<if>/device/link for this.
>
How about adding a quirk table for the matched DMI patterns, allowing
the hardware
makers to opt-in ASPM settings in the kernel segment as an alternative
to the PCI sysfs?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread[parent not found: <CAP-8N0jAjeY8Wthta1yS8Hs57KKt6HyFWpYM6=q1t+jxF_sY1A@mail.gmail.com>]
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] r8169: add module parameter aspm_en_force
[not found] ` <CAP-8N0jAjeY8Wthta1yS8Hs57KKt6HyFWpYM6=q1t+jxF_sY1A@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2025-04-21 8:45 ` Heiner Kallweit
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Heiner Kallweit @ 2025-04-21 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Crag Wang
Cc: nic_swsd, Andrew Lunn, David S. Miller, Eric Dumazet,
Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, crag.wang, dell.client.kernel,
netdev, linux-kernel
On 21.04.2025 10:17, Crag Wang wrote:
>
> Adding module parameters is discouraged.
> Also note that you have the option already to re-activate ASPM, you can use the
> standard PCI sysfs attributes under /sys/class/net/<if>/device/link for this.
>
>
> How about adding a quirk table for the matched DMI patterns, allowing the hardware
> makers to opt-in ASPM settings in the kernel segment as an alternative to the PCI sysfs?
>
There is already such an option, see rtl_aspm_is_safe().
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-21 8:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-03-24 12:55 [PATCH 1/1] r8169: add module parameter aspm_en_force Crag Wang
2025-03-24 13:27 ` Heiner Kallweit
2025-04-21 8:20 ` Crag Wang
[not found] ` <CAP-8N0jAjeY8Wthta1yS8Hs57KKt6HyFWpYM6=q1t+jxF_sY1A@mail.gmail.com>
2025-04-21 8:45 ` Heiner Kallweit
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®