From: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
vkuznets@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, joro@8bytes.org,
bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
x86@kernel.org, jmattson@google.com, wanpengli@tencent.com,
bsd@redhat.com, dgilbert@redhat.com, luto@amacapital.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: SVM: Support #GP handling for the case of nested on nested
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:59:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b636e2d15ab17302265ef932575f26647b7a959f.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210126081831.570253-5-wei.huang2@amd.com>
On Tue, 2021-01-26 at 03:18 -0500, Wei Huang wrote:
> Under the case of nested on nested (L0->L1->L2->L3), #GP triggered by
> SVM instructions can be hided from L1. Instead the hypervisor can
> inject the proper #VMEXIT to inform L1 of what is happening. Thus L1
> can avoid invoking the #GP workaround. For this reason we turns on
> guest VM's X86_FEATURE_SVME_ADDR_CHK bit for KVM running inside VM to
> receive the notification and change behavior.
>
> Similarly we check if vcpu is under guest mode before emulating the
> vmware-backdoor instructions. For the case of nested on nested, we
> let the guest handle it.
>
> Co-developed-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@amd.com>
> Tested-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index f9233c79265b..83c401d2709f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -929,6 +929,9 @@ static __init void svm_set_cpu_caps(void)
>
> if (npt_enabled)
> kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_NPT);
> +
> + /* Nested VM can receive #VMEXIT instead of triggering #GP */
> + kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_SVME_ADDR_CHK);
> }
>
> /* CPUID 0x80000008 */
> @@ -2198,6 +2201,11 @@ static int svm_instr_opcode(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> static int emulate_svm_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int opcode)
> {
> + const int guest_mode_exit_codes[] = {
> + [SVM_INSTR_VMRUN] = SVM_EXIT_VMRUN,
> + [SVM_INSTR_VMLOAD] = SVM_EXIT_VMLOAD,
> + [SVM_INSTR_VMSAVE] = SVM_EXIT_VMSAVE,
> + };
> int (*const svm_instr_handlers[])(struct vcpu_svm *svm) = {
> [SVM_INSTR_VMRUN] = vmrun_interception,
> [SVM_INSTR_VMLOAD] = vmload_interception,
> @@ -2205,7 +2213,14 @@ static int emulate_svm_instr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int opcode)
> };
> struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>
> - return svm_instr_handlers[opcode](svm);
> + if (is_guest_mode(vcpu)) {
> + svm->vmcb->control.exit_code = guest_mode_exit_codes[opcode];
> + svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_1 = 0;
> + svm->vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = 0;
> +
> + return nested_svm_vmexit(svm);
> + } else
> + return svm_instr_handlers[opcode](svm);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2239,7 +2254,8 @@ static int gp_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> * VMware backdoor emulation on #GP interception only handles
> * IN{S}, OUT{S}, and RDPMC.
> */
> - return kvm_emulate_instruction(vcpu,
> + if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu))
> + return kvm_emulate_instruction(vcpu,
> EMULTYPE_VMWARE_GP | EMULTYPE_NO_DECODE);
> } else
> return emulate_svm_instr(vcpu, opcode);
To be honest I expected the vmware backdoor fix to be in a separate patch,
but I see that Paulo already took these patches so I guess it is too late.
Anyway I am very happy to see this workaround merged, and see that bug
disappear forever.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-26 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-26 8:18 [PATCH v3 0/4] Handle #GP for SVM execution instructions Wei Huang
2021-01-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] KVM: x86: Factor out x86 instruction emulation with decoding Wei Huang
2021-01-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] KVM: SVM: Add emulation support for #GP triggered by SVM instructions Wei Huang
2021-01-26 11:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 11:50 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-01-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] KVM: SVM: Add support for SVM instruction address check change Wei Huang
2021-01-26 11:52 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-01-26 15:39 ` Wei Huang
2021-01-26 8:18 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: SVM: Support #GP handling for the case of nested on nested Wei Huang
2021-01-26 11:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 11:59 ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2021-01-26 11:39 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] Handle #GP for SVM execution instructions Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-26 15:05 ` Wei Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b636e2d15ab17302265ef932575f26647b7a959f.camel@redhat.com \
--to=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bsd@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®