From: Louis-Alexis Eyraud <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Biao Huang <biao.huang@mediatek.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/9] net: stmmac: mediatek: add RX/TX delay stage divider in platform data
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 12:36:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b7d26b378e3cfdb54a113cca1d8d53293cad966c.camel@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <34608ab8-18f3-4680-8276-cd8611c05cb1@bootlin.com>
Hi Maxime,
On Fri, 2026-10-16 at 13:37 +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> Hi Louis-Alexis,
>
> On 10/16/26 12:31, Louis-Alexis Eyraud wrote:
> > In preparation of newer SoC support, that have like MT8189 SoC
> > different RX and TX internal delay stage steps than MT8188/MT8195,
> > add
> > the RX and TX delay stage divider values in the variant platform
> > data
> > and replace the hardcoded value uses in mt2712_set_delay and
> > mt8195_set_delay.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Louis-Alexis Eyraud
> > <louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com>
> > ---
> > .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-mediatek.c | 46
> > ++++++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-mediatek.c
> > b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-mediatek.c
> > index 596411d4a5b2..cb5bda53edb9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-mediatek.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-mediatek.c
> > @@ -108,6 +108,10 @@ struct mediatek_dwmac_variant {
> >
> > u32 rx_delay_max;
> > u32 tx_delay_max;
> > + u16 rx_rmii_delay_stage_div;
> > + u16 tx_rmii_delay_stage_div;
> > + u16 rx_rgmii_delay_stage_div;
> > + u16 tx_rgmii_delay_stage_div;
> > u8 dma_bit_mask;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -146,14 +150,22 @@ static int mt2712_set_delay(struct
> > mediatek_dwmac_plat_data *plat)
> > u32 fine_val = 0;
> >
> > if (phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii(plat->phy_mode)) {
> > - rx_delay_stage_div =
> > MT2712_RGMII_DLY_RXC_STAGE_DIV;
> > - tx_delay_stage_div =
> > MT2712_RGMII_DLY_TXC_STAGE_DIV;
> > + rx_delay_stage_div = plat->variant-
> > >rx_rgmii_delay_stage_div;
> > + tx_delay_stage_div = plat->variant-
> > >tx_rgmii_delay_stage_div;
> > } else {
> > - rx_delay_stage_div =
> > MT2712_RMII_DLY_RXC_STAGE_DIV;
> > - tx_delay_stage_div =
> > MT2712_RMII_DLY_TXC_STAGE_DIV;
> > + rx_delay_stage_div = plat->variant-
> > >rx_rmii_delay_stage_div;
> > + tx_delay_stage_div = plat->variant-
> > >tx_rmii_delay_stage_div;
>
> Looking closer at this, what's RMII delay ? There's no delays in
> RMII, and
> it's a single clock not a RX and TX clock like RGMII, there's no RMII
> TXC/RXC.
>
You are right, these structures field and define names are wrong for
RMII/MII cases.
The mediatek,tx-delay-ps and mediatek,rx-delay-ps vendor properties are
used by this driver to fine tune different clocks depending on the phy
mode:
- RX_CLK/TX_CLK in MII
- REF_CLK in RMII
- TXC/RXC in RGMII
I'll fix the fields and define names in next series revision, along the
issues the Sashiko reviews found.
> I think it's the same as on allwinner, the delay handling has been
> mixed-up between
> RMII and RGMII in the glue, you should be able to simplify this even
> more by
> ditching the RMII case.
The register fields that the driver sets in RMII or MII mode to tune
the needed clock(s) are different than the ones set in RGMII.
So I cannot really ditch the case but I'll simplify the delay handling.
For instance I could use a single divider field per mode, since for all
compatibles the value is the same in both RX and TX.
Best regards,
Louis-Alexis
>
> Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 10:31 [PATCH net-next v3 0/9] net/stmmac: Add Mediatek MT8189 support Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-16 10:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/9] dt-bindings: net: mediatek-dwmac: fix unit in rx/tx delay property description Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-16 15:33 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-17 17:46 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-16 10:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/9] dt-bindings: net: mediatek-dwmac: add support for MT8189 SoC Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-16 15:40 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-21 9:43 ` Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-21 12:44 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-16 10:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/9] net: stmmac: mediatek: simplify TX/RX delay handling in mt8195_set_delay Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-16 10:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/9] net: stmmac: mediatek: simplify TX/RX delay handling in mt2712_set_delay Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-20 13:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-16 10:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/9] net: stmmac: mediatek: add RX/TX delay stage divider in platform data Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-16 11:37 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-10-21 10:36 ` Louis-Alexis Eyraud [this message]
2026-10-20 13:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-16 10:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/9] net: stmmac: mediatek: add PERI_ETH_CTRLx register offset " Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-16 10:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/9] net: stmmac: mediatek: use TX clock phase shift in RGMII mode with 1Gbps speed Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-16 11:41 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-10-16 15:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-10-20 13:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-16 10:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] net: stmmac: mediatek: add support for TX clock output enable feature Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-16 10:31 ` [PATCH net-next v3 9/9] net: stmmac: mediatek: add support for MT8189 SoC Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2026-10-20 13:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b7d26b378e3cfdb54a113cca1d8d53293cad966c.camel@collabora.com \
--to=louisalexis.eyraud@collabora.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=biao.huang@mediatek.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®