Re: [PATCH 01/10] x86/tdx: Zero out the missing RSI in TDX_HYPERCALL macro

[Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>]

On 7/12/23 1:55 AM, Kai Huang wrote:
> In the TDX_HYPERCALL asm, after the TDCALL instruction returns from the
> untrusted VMM, the registers that the TDX guest shares to the VMM need
> to be cleared to avoid speculative execution of VMM-provided values.
> 
> RSI is specified in the bitmap of those registers, but it is missing
> when zeroing out those registers in the current TDX_HYPERCALL.
> 
> It was there when it was originally added in commit 752d13305c78
> ("x86/tdx: Expand __tdx_hypercall() to handle more arguments"), but was
> later removed in commit 1e70c680375a ("x86/tdx: Do not corrupt
> frame-pointer in __tdx_hypercall()"), which was correct because %rsi is
> later restored in the "pop %rsi".  However a later commit 7a3a401874be
> ("x86/tdx: Drop flags from __tdx_hypercall()") removed that "pop %rsi"
> but forgot to add the "xor %rsi, %rsi" back.
> 
> Fix by adding it back.
> 
> Fixes: 7a3a401874be ("x86/tdx: Drop flags from __tdx_hypercall()")
> Signed-off-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
> ---

Looks fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

>  arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
> index b193c0a1d8db..2eca5f43734f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S
> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(__tdx_module_call)
>  	xor %r10d, %r10d
>  	xor %r11d, %r11d
>  	xor %rdi,  %rdi
> +	xor %rsi,  %rsi
>  	xor %rdx,  %rdx
>  
>  	/* Restore callee-saved GPRs as mandated by the x86_64 ABI */

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer