From: "Sverdlin, Alexander" <alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com>
To: "christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu" <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "hui.wang@canonical.com" <hui.wang@canonical.com>,
"mwalle@kernel.org" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"florent.trinh-thai@cs-soprasteria.com"
<florent.trinh-thai@cs-soprasteria.com>,
"arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] eeprom: at25: convert to spi-mem API
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2025 11:41:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd174dbaa3171f92e083d5dca89732aa64e32f15.camel@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a88e1546-1530-4326-b0ee-dc4e50d0343f@csgroup.eu>
Hi Christophe,
On Sat, 2025-11-08 at 12:14 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > Now I'm trying to understand why the problem surfaced with commit
> > 8ad6249c51d0 ("eeprom: at25: convert to spi-mem API")
> >
>
> The reason why it was not a problem before was that the transfer was
> done into of->prealloc_buf (fs/kernfs/file.c) which is a kmalloc() with
> size (PAGE_SIZE + 1).
>
> Following the rework of at25 it now goes into the bounce buffer which is
> allocated with the exact size of the transfer.
>
> Why do we need an intermediate bounce buffer now, why can't
> of->prealloc_buf be used directly as before ?
userspace access is only one part of the story, the other is NVMEM
kernel-internal API, like nvmem_cell_read*() and I suppose there is
no requirement for a destination buffer to be DMA-able.
--
Alexander Sverdlin
Siemens AG
www.siemens.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-08 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-02 22:28 A. Sverdlin
2025-07-04 10:09 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-03 16:33 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-11-03 19:12 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-11-03 21:46 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-11-03 22:29 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-11-03 22:36 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-11-04 13:13 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-11-04 13:24 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-11-04 23:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-11-05 7:20 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-11-07 11:49 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-11-07 13:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-11-07 13:44 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
2025-11-08 10:05 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-11-08 11:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-11-08 11:41 ` Sverdlin, Alexander [this message]
2025-11-08 16:24 ` Christophe Leroy
2025-11-10 15:09 ` Sverdlin, Alexander
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd174dbaa3171f92e083d5dca89732aa64e32f15.camel@siemens.com \
--to=alexander.sverdlin@siemens.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=florent.trinh-thai@cs-soprasteria.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®