From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
ritesh.list@gmail.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/12] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:00:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd3db475-39c6-4610-ad66-8bfd99e03947@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9Hl39cS-V2r-5mY@dread.disaster.area>
On 12/03/2025 19:51, Dave Chinner wrote:
>> We are never getting aligned extents wrt write length, and so have to fall
>> back to the SW-based atomic write always. That is not what we want.
> Please add a comment to explain this where the XFS_BMAPI_EXTSZALIGN
> flag is set, because it's not at all obvious what it is doing or why
> it is needed from the name of the variable or the implementation.
ok, fine. But that is as long as we just are doing the alignment for
XFS_BMAPI_EXTSZALIGN (and not always, as Christoph queried).
Thanks,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-03 17:11 [PATCH v4 00/12] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] xfs: Pass flags to xfs_reflink_allocate_cow() John Garry
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] iomap: Rename IOMAP_ATOMIC -> IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW John Garry
2025-03-05 12:57 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-03-06 8:50 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] iomap: Support SW-based atomic writes John Garry
2025-03-09 21:51 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-10 10:44 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 17:21 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on " John Garry
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] xfs: Reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] xfs: Iomap SW-based " John Garry
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-03-10 13:39 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-03-10 15:24 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 17:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] xfs: Update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-03-10 10:06 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-03-10 10:54 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 11:11 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-03-10 11:20 ` John Garry
2025-03-10 12:38 ` Carlos Maiolino
2025-03-10 12:59 ` John Garry
2025-03-03 17:11 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-03-09 22:03 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-10 12:10 ` John Garry
2025-03-12 19:51 ` Dave Chinner
2025-03-12 21:00 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-03-06 8:47 ` (subset) [PATCH v4 00/12] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cd3db475-39c6-4610-ad66-8bfd99e03947@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®