mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
To: <paolo.valente@linaro.org>, <jack@suse.cz>,
	<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <tj@kernel.org>, <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v10 0/4] support concurrent sync io for bfq on a specail occasion
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:12:42 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cdcba617-c27a-9a64-2560-b2b273c74511@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220610021701.2347602-1-yukuai3@huawei.com>

Hi, Paolo

Can you take a look at this patchset?

Thanks,
Kuai

在 2022/06/10 10:16, Yu Kuai 写道:
> There are some problem in our mail server, resend v9 because Paolo seems
> didn't receive them(hopefully v10 will be fine).
> 
> Changes in v10:
>   - Add reviewed-tag for patch 2
> 
> Changes in v9:
>   - also update how many bfqqs have pending_reqs bfq_bfqq_move().
>   - fix one language in patch 4
>   - Add reviewed-tag for patch 1,3,4
> 
> Changes in v8:
>   - Instead of using whether bfqq is busy, using whether bfqq has pending
>   requests. As Paolo pointed out the former way is problematic.
> 
> Changes in v7:
>   - fix mismatch bfq_inc/del_busy_queues() and bfqq_add/del_bfqq_busy(),
>   also retest this patchset on v5.18 to make sure functionality is
>   correct.
>   - move the updating of 'bfqd->busy_queues' into new apis
> 
> Changes in v6:
>   - add reviewed-by tag for patch 1
> 
> Changes in v5:
>   - rename bfq_add_busy_queues() to bfq_inc_busy_queues() in patch 1
>   - fix wrong definition in patch 1
>   - fix spelling mistake in patch 2: leaset -> least
>   - update comments in patch 3
>   - add reviewed-by tag in patch 2,3
> 
> Changes in v4:
>   - split bfq_update_busy_queues() to bfq_add/dec_busy_queues(),
>     suggested by Jan Kara.
>   - remove unused 'in_groups_with_pending_reqs',
> 
> Changes in v3:
>   - remove the cleanup patch that is irrelevant now(I'll post it
>     separately).
>   - instead of hacking wr queues and using weights tree insertion/removal,
>     using bfq_add/del_bfqq_busy() to count the number of groups
>     (suggested by Jan Kara).
> 
> Changes in v2:
>   - Use a different approch to count root group, which is much simple.
> 
> Currently, bfq can't handle sync io concurrently as long as they
> are not issued from root group. This is because
> 'bfqd->num_groups_with_pending_reqs > 0' is always true in
> bfq_asymmetric_scenario().
> 
> The way that bfqg is counted into 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs':
> 
> Before this patchset:
>   1) root group will never be counted.
>   2) Count if bfqg or it's child bfqgs have pending requests.
>   3) Don't count if bfqg and it's child bfqgs complete all the requests.
> 
> After this patchset:
>   1) root group is counted.
>   2) Count if bfqg has pending requests.
>   3) Don't count if bfqg complete all the requests.
> 
> With the above changes, concurrent sync io can be supported if only
> one group is activated.
> 
> fio test script(startdelay is used to avoid queue merging):
> [global]
> filename=/dev/sda
> allow_mounted_write=0
> ioengine=psync
> direct=1
> ioscheduler=bfq
> offset_increment=10g
> group_reporting
> rw=randwrite
> bs=4k
> 
> [test1]
> numjobs=1
> 
> [test2]
> startdelay=1
> numjobs=1
> 
> [test3]
> startdelay=2
> numjobs=1
> 
> [test4]
> startdelay=3
> numjobs=1
> 
> [test5]
> startdelay=4
> numjobs=1
> 
> [test6]
> startdelay=5
> numjobs=1
> 
> [test7]
> startdelay=6
> numjobs=1
> 
> [test8]
> startdelay=7
> numjobs=1
> 
> test result:
> running fio on root cgroup
> v5.18:	   112 Mib/s
> v5.18-patched: 112 Mib/s
> 
> running fio on non-root cgroup
> v5.18:	   51.2 Mib/s
> v5.18-patched: 112 Mib/s
> 
> Note that I also test null_blk with "irqmode=2
> completion_nsec=100000000(100ms) hw_queue_depth=1", and tests show
> that service guarantees are still preserved.
> 
> Previous versions:
> RFC: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211127101132.486806-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220305091205.4188398-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220416093753.3054696-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/
> v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220427124722.48465-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/
> v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220428111907.3635820-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/
> v5: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220428120837.3737765-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/
> v6: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220523131818.2798712-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/
> v7: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220528095020.186970-1-yukuai3@huawei.com/
> 
> 
> Yu Kuai (4):
>    block, bfq: support to track if bfqq has pending requests
>    block, bfq: record how many queues have pending requests
>    block, bfq: refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs'
>    block, bfq: do not idle if only one group is activated
> 
>   block/bfq-cgroup.c  | 10 ++++++++++
>   block/bfq-iosched.c | 47 +++------------------------------------------
>   block/bfq-iosched.h | 21 +++++++++++---------
>   block/bfq-wf2q.c    | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>   4 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-17  1:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-10  2:16 Yu Kuai
2022-06-10  2:16 ` [PATCH -next v10 1/4] block, bfq: support to track if bfqq has pending requests Yu Kuai
2022-06-10  2:16 ` [PATCH -next v10 2/4] block, bfq: record how many queues have " Yu Kuai
2022-06-10  2:17 ` [PATCH -next v10 3/4] block, bfq: refactor the counting of 'num_groups_with_pending_reqs' Yu Kuai
2022-06-23 15:32   ` Paolo Valente
2022-06-24  1:26     ` Yu Kuai
2022-06-25  8:10       ` Yu Kuai
2022-07-12 13:30     ` Yu Kuai
     [not found]       ` <C2CF100A-9A7C-4300-9A70-1295BC939C66@unimore.it>
2022-07-20 11:38         ` Yu Kuai
2022-07-27 12:11           ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-05 11:20             ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-10 10:49             ` Paolo Valente
2022-08-11  1:19               ` Yu Kuai
2022-08-25 12:14                 ` Yu Kuai
     [not found]                 ` <D89DCF20-27D8-4F8F-B8B0-FD193FC4F18D@unimore.it>
2022-08-26  2:34                   ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-06  9:37                     ` Paolo Valente
2022-09-07  1:16                       ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-14  1:55                         ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-14  7:50                           ` Paolo VALENTE
2022-09-14  8:15                             ` Yu Kuai
2022-09-14  9:00                               ` Jan Kara
2022-09-15  1:18                                 ` Yu Kuai
2022-06-10  2:17 ` [PATCH -next v10 4/4] block, bfq: do not idle if only one group is activated Yu Kuai
2022-06-17  1:12 ` Yu Kuai [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cdcba617-c27a-9a64-2560-b2b273c74511@huawei.com \
    --to=yukuai3@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®