* [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling
@ 2026-10-01 9:00 Beata Michalska
2026-10-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap Beata Michalska
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Beata Michalska @ 2026-10-01 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Vladimir.Murzin, catalin.marinas, will, suzuki.poulose,
James.Morse, xuewen.yan94, seanwang1, linux-kernel
This series factors out the existing Cortex-A510 erratum 2457168 AMU constant
counter workaround into a generic broken AMU constant-counter capability,
then wires Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 into the same handling.
---
v4:
- use midr range instead of multi cap list
- reword comment to be more generic
v3:
- splitted the commit and droped changes for cpucap_is_possible
---
Beata Michalska (2):
arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap
arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround
Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 2 ++
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 24 ++++++++++++-----
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 16 ++++++-----
arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 2 +-
6 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap
2026-10-01 9:00 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling Beata Michalska
@ 2026-10-01 9:00 ` Beata Michalska
2026-10-01 12:10 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-10-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround Beata Michalska
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Beata Michalska @ 2026-10-01 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Vladimir.Murzin, catalin.marinas, will, suzuki.poulose,
James.Morse, xuewen.yan94, seanwang1, linux-kernel
Move the workaround from the erratum 2457168-specific cpucap to a generic
broken AMU constant-counter one. This keeps the existing Cortex-A510
handling unchanged while allowing other errata with similar AMU constant
counter issue to share the capability bit and call sites.
Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 7 ++++---
arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 2 +-
5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index b5a51b0ef9440..3b6c052d46a18 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -1040,9 +1040,17 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_1902691
If unsure, say Y.
+config ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
+ bool
+ # Targeting errata affecting AMEVCNTR01, the AMU constant counter.
+ # On affected CPUs the counter may not increment at the expected rate,
+ # making it unreliable. As a result, AMU users should treat it as
+ # unavailable rather than relying on misleading counter values.
+
config ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
bool "Cortex-A510: 2457168: workaround for AMEVCNTR01 incrementing incorrectly"
depends on ARM64_AMU_EXTN
+ select ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
default y
help
This option adds the workaround for ARM Cortex-A510 erratum 2457168.
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 5db8f0619e4bc..8ce559ac073c7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -381,6 +381,16 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_repeat_tlbi_list[] = {
};
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
+static const struct midr_range workaround_amu_constcnt_list[] = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
+ /* Cortex-A510 r0p0-r1p1 */
+ MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 1, 1),
+#endif
+ {}
+};
+#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT */
+
#ifdef CONFIG_CAVIUM_ERRATUM_23154
static const struct midr_range cavium_erratum_23154_cpus[] = {
MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_THUNDERX),
@@ -916,14 +926,12 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = {
ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 2)
},
#endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
{
- .desc = "ARM erratum 2457168",
- .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168,
+ .desc = "Broken AMU AMEVCNTR01 (const counter)",
+ .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT,
.type = ARM64_CPUCAP_WEAK_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE,
-
- /* Cortex-A510 r0p0-r1p1 */
- CAP_MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 1, 1)
+ CAP_MIDR_RANGE_LIST(workaround_amu_constcnt_list)
},
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 17b83a2518a8f..1569f84214763 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -2064,7 +2064,7 @@ static void cpu_amu_enable(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &amu_cpus);
/* 0 reference values signal broken/disabled counters */
- if (!this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168))
+ if (!this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT))
update_freq_counters_refs();
}
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index d28438f8b83f1..64588554e7f76 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static void cpu_read_constcnt(void *val)
* the counter is disabled. A return value of 0 at counter read is
* properly handled as an error case by the users of the counter.
*/
- *(u64 *)val = this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168) ?
+ *(u64 *)val = this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT) ?
0UL : read_constcnt();
}
@@ -463,8 +463,9 @@ static void amu_read_core_const_ctrs(void *val)
/*
* cpu_read_constcnt() incurs slight latency due to the
- * ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168 check. Read it first to minimize
- * the sampling skew between the const and core counters.
+ * ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT check.
+ * Read it first to minimize the sampling skew between the const
+ * and core counters.
*/
cpu_read_constcnt(&ctrs->constcnt);
cpu_read_corecnt(&ctrs->corecnt);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
index 2775ba3359cfe..58b6c084f9f25 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
@@ -105,7 +105,6 @@ WORKAROUND_1902691
WORKAROUND_2038923
WORKAROUND_2064142
WORKAROUND_2077057
-WORKAROUND_2457168
WORKAROUND_2645198
WORKAROUND_2658417
WORKAROUND_4193714
@@ -132,3 +131,4 @@ WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI_SYNC
WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT
WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_SSBS
WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
+WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround
2026-10-01 9:00 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling Beata Michalska
2026-10-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap Beata Michalska
@ 2026-10-01 9:00 ` Beata Michalska
2026-10-01 12:12 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-10-01 11:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling Will Deacon
2026-10-01 15:50 ` Will Deacon
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Beata Michalska @ 2026-10-01 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Vladimir.Murzin, catalin.marinas, will, suzuki.poulose,
James.Morse, xuewen.yan94, seanwang1, linux-kernel
Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 affects the CNT_CYCLES event, which can
incur a significant increment error when a CPU enters and subsequently
exits WFE or WFI, and may no longer track the system counter
frequency.
The AMEVCNTR01_EL0 counter is used as the AMU constant counter for
frequency invariance and CPPC FFH feedback counters. Wire the affected
Cortex-A725 range into the shared broken AMU constant-counter capability
so the affected counter is treated as unavailable by returning zero in
the AMU counter paths. This prevents the broken counter from being used
as a reference source.
The erratum can also affect PMUv3 users of the CNT_CYCLES event,
but this workaround intentionally does not change PMU event handling.
Hiding or rejecting the PMU event from the erratum code would change
the perf-visible PMU event interface, including raw event selection,
and would need a separate PMU-specific approach rather than being
folded into the AMU reference-counter workaround.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
---
Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 2 ++
arch/arm64/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 4 ++++
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 9 +++++----
4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
index ac3248b9f2f3b..99a1eb4b833dd 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
@@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ stable kernels.
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| ARM | Cortex-A725 | #3456106 | ARM64_ERRATUM_3194386 |
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
+| ARM | Cortex-A725 | #3821522 | ARM64_ERRATUM_3821522 |
++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| ARM | Cortex-X1 | #1502854 | N/A |
+----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
| ARM | Cortex-X1 | #3324344 | ARM64_ERRATUM_3194386 |
diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 3b6c052d46a18..cab741a695f52 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -1081,6 +1081,28 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_2645198
If unsure, say Y.
+config ARM64_ERRATUM_3821522
+ bool "Cortex-A725: 3821522: workaround for possible CNT_CYCLES increment error due to WFE/WFI"
+ depends on ARM64_AMU_EXTN
+ select ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
+ default y
+ help
+ This option adds the workaround for ARM Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522.
+
+ On affected A725 cores, the CNT_CYCLES event may incur a significant
+ increment error when entering and subsequently exiting WFx.
+ As a result, the CNT_CYCLES may diverge from the system counter
+ frequency at which it is expected to increment.
+ This renders the AMU counter AMEVCNTR01, that implements CNT_CYCLES,
+ being unreliable and unsuitable for use.
+
+ Since there is no hardware workaround, reads of the affected CNT_CYCLES
+ counter return 0 in the relevant paths. This causes users of the counter
+ to treat it as unavailable and is functionally equivalent to firmware
+ disabling the affected counter.
+
+ If unsure, say Y.
+
config ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
bool
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
index 8ce559ac073c7..40c14e8600ae0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
@@ -386,6 +386,10 @@ static const struct midr_range workaround_amu_constcnt_list[] = {
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
/* Cortex-A510 r0p0-r1p1 */
MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 1, 1),
+#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_3821522
+ /* Cortex-A725 r0p0 - r0p2 */
+ MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A725, 0, 0, 0, 2),
#endif
{}
};
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index 64588554e7f76..f1bdb49d5d92e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -397,10 +397,11 @@ static void cpu_read_corecnt(void *val)
static void cpu_read_constcnt(void *val)
{
/*
- * Return 0 if the current CPU is affected by erratum 2457168. A value
- * of 0 is also returned if the current CPU does not support AMUs or if
- * the counter is disabled. A return value of 0 at counter read is
- * properly handled as an error case by the users of the counter.
+ * Return 0 if the current CPU is affected by a HW erratum.
+ * A value of 0 is also returned if the current CPU does not
+ * support AMUs or if the counter is disabled. A return
+ * value of 0 at counter read is properly handled as an error
+ * case by the users of the counter.
*/
*(u64 *)val = this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT) ?
0UL : read_constcnt();
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling
2026-10-01 9:00 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling Beata Michalska
2026-10-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap Beata Michalska
2026-10-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround Beata Michalska
@ 2026-10-01 11:42 ` Will Deacon
2026-10-01 12:14 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-10-01 15:50 ` Will Deacon
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2026-10-01 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Beata Michalska, Vladimir.Murzin
Cc: suzuki.poulose, James.Morse, xuewen.yan94, seanwang1, linux-kernel
On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 11:00:30AM +0200, Beata Michalska wrote:
> This series factors out the existing Cortex-A510 erratum 2457168 AMU constant
> counter workaround into a generic broken AMU constant-counter capability,
> then wires Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 into the same handling.
Thanks, Beata. These look good to me now and I'd like to include them
in the next batch of arm64 fixes, but I'll give Vladimir a chance to
have another look first...
Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap
2026-10-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap Beata Michalska
@ 2026-10-01 12:10 ` Vladimir Murzin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Murzin @ 2026-10-01 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Beata Michalska, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, suzuki.poulose, James.Morse, xuewen.yan94,
seanwang1, linux-kernel
On 10/1/26 10:00, Beata Michalska wrote:
> Move the workaround from the erratum 2457168-specific cpucap to a generic
> broken AMU constant-counter one. This keeps the existing Cortex-A510
> handling unchanged while allowing other errata with similar AMU constant
> counter issue to share the capability bit and call sites.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 8 ++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 7 ++++---
> arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 2 +-
> 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index b5a51b0ef9440..3b6c052d46a18 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -1040,9 +1040,17 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_1902691
>
> If unsure, say Y.
>
> +config ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
> + bool
> + # Targeting errata affecting AMEVCNTR01, the AMU constant counter.
> + # On affected CPUs the counter may not increment at the expected rate,
> + # making it unreliable. As a result, AMU users should treat it as
> + # unavailable rather than relying on misleading counter values.
> +
> config ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
> bool "Cortex-A510: 2457168: workaround for AMEVCNTR01 incrementing incorrectly"
> depends on ARM64_AMU_EXTN
> + select ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
> default y
> help
> This option adds the workaround for ARM Cortex-A510 erratum 2457168.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> index 5db8f0619e4bc..8ce559ac073c7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> @@ -381,6 +381,16 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_repeat_tlbi_list[] = {
> };
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
> +static const struct midr_range workaround_amu_constcnt_list[] = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
> + /* Cortex-A510 r0p0-r1p1 */
> + MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 1, 1),
> +#endif
> + {}
> +};
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT */
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_CAVIUM_ERRATUM_23154
> static const struct midr_range cavium_erratum_23154_cpus[] = {
> MIDR_ALL_VERSIONS(MIDR_THUNDERX),
> @@ -916,14 +926,12 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = {
> ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 2)
> },
> #endif
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
> {
> - .desc = "ARM erratum 2457168",
> - .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168,
> + .desc = "Broken AMU AMEVCNTR01 (const counter)",
> + .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT,
> .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_WEAK_LOCAL_CPU_FEATURE,
> -
> - /* Cortex-A510 r0p0-r1p1 */
> - CAP_MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 1, 1)
> + CAP_MIDR_RANGE_LIST(workaround_amu_constcnt_list)
> },
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 17b83a2518a8f..1569f84214763 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -2064,7 +2064,7 @@ static void cpu_amu_enable(struct arm64_cpu_capabilities const *cap)
> cpumask_set_cpu(smp_processor_id(), &amu_cpus);
>
> /* 0 reference values signal broken/disabled counters */
> - if (!this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168))
> + if (!this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT))
> update_freq_counters_refs();
> }
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index d28438f8b83f1..64588554e7f76 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static void cpu_read_constcnt(void *val)
> * the counter is disabled. A return value of 0 at counter read is
> * properly handled as an error case by the users of the counter.
> */
> - *(u64 *)val = this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168) ?
> + *(u64 *)val = this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT) ?
> 0UL : read_constcnt();
> }
>
> @@ -463,8 +463,9 @@ static void amu_read_core_const_ctrs(void *val)
>
> /*
> * cpu_read_constcnt() incurs slight latency due to the
> - * ARM64_WORKAROUND_2457168 check. Read it first to minimize
> - * the sampling skew between the const and core counters.
> + * ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT check.
> + * Read it first to minimize the sampling skew between the const
> + * and core counters.
> */
> cpu_read_constcnt(&ctrs->constcnt);
> cpu_read_corecnt(&ctrs->corecnt);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> index 2775ba3359cfe..58b6c084f9f25 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> @@ -105,7 +105,6 @@ WORKAROUND_1902691
> WORKAROUND_2038923
> WORKAROUND_2064142
> WORKAROUND_2077057
> -WORKAROUND_2457168
> WORKAROUND_2645198
> WORKAROUND_2658417
> WORKAROUND_4193714
> @@ -132,3 +131,4 @@ WORKAROUND_REPEAT_TLBI_SYNC
> WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_AT
> WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_SSBS
> WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
> +WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
> -- 2.43.0
>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Thanks
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround
2026-10-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround Beata Michalska
@ 2026-10-01 12:12 ` Vladimir Murzin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Murzin @ 2026-10-01 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Beata Michalska, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, suzuki.poulose, James.Morse, xuewen.yan94,
seanwang1, linux-kernel
On 10/1/26 10:00, Beata Michalska wrote:
> Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 affects the CNT_CYCLES event, which can
> incur a significant increment error when a CPU enters and subsequently
> exits WFE or WFI, and may no longer track the system counter
> frequency.
>
> The AMEVCNTR01_EL0 counter is used as the AMU constant counter for
> frequency invariance and CPPC FFH feedback counters. Wire the affected
> Cortex-A725 range into the shared broken AMU constant-counter capability
> so the affected counter is treated as unavailable by returning zero in
> the AMU counter paths. This prevents the broken counter from being used
> as a reference source.
>
> The erratum can also affect PMUv3 users of the CNT_CYCLES event,
> but this workaround intentionally does not change PMU event handling.
> Hiding or rejecting the PMU event from the erratum code would change
> the perf-visible PMU event interface, including raw event selection,
> and would need a separate PMU-specific approach rather than being
> folded into the AMU reference-counter workaround.
>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Beata Michalska <beata.michalska@arm.com>
> ---
> Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst | 2 ++
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 4 ++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 9 +++++----
> 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
> index ac3248b9f2f3b..99a1eb4b833dd 100644
> --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
> @@ -174,6 +174,8 @@ stable kernels.
> +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
> | ARM | Cortex-A725 | #3456106 | ARM64_ERRATUM_3194386 |
> +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
> +| ARM | Cortex-A725 | #3821522 | ARM64_ERRATUM_3821522 |
> ++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
> | ARM | Cortex-X1 | #1502854 | N/A |
> +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
> | ARM | Cortex-X1 | #3324344 | ARM64_ERRATUM_3194386 |
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 3b6c052d46a18..cab741a695f52 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -1081,6 +1081,28 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_2645198
>
> If unsure, say Y.
>
> +config ARM64_ERRATUM_3821522
> + bool "Cortex-A725: 3821522: workaround for possible CNT_CYCLES increment error due to WFE/WFI"
> + depends on ARM64_AMU_EXTN
> + select ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT
> + default y
> + help
> + This option adds the workaround for ARM Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522.
> +
> + On affected A725 cores, the CNT_CYCLES event may incur a significant
> + increment error when entering and subsequently exiting WFx.
> + As a result, the CNT_CYCLES may diverge from the system counter
> + frequency at which it is expected to increment.
> + This renders the AMU counter AMEVCNTR01, that implements CNT_CYCLES,
> + being unreliable and unsuitable for use.
> +
> + Since there is no hardware workaround, reads of the affected CNT_CYCLES
> + counter return 0 in the relevant paths. This causes users of the counter
> + to treat it as unavailable and is functionally equivalent to firmware
> + disabling the affected counter.
> +
> + If unsure, say Y.
> +
> config ARM64_WORKAROUND_SPECULATIVE_UNPRIV_LOAD
> bool
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> index 8ce559ac073c7..40c14e8600ae0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> @@ -386,6 +386,10 @@ static const struct midr_range workaround_amu_constcnt_list[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2457168
> /* Cortex-A510 r0p0-r1p1 */
> MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 1, 1),
> +#endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_3821522
> + /* Cortex-A725 r0p0 - r0p2 */
> + MIDR_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A725, 0, 0, 0, 2),
> #endif
> {}
> };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 64588554e7f76..f1bdb49d5d92e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -397,10 +397,11 @@ static void cpu_read_corecnt(void *val)
> static void cpu_read_constcnt(void *val)
> {
> /*
> - * Return 0 if the current CPU is affected by erratum 2457168. A value
> - * of 0 is also returned if the current CPU does not support AMUs or if
> - * the counter is disabled. A return value of 0 at counter read is
> - * properly handled as an error case by the users of the counter.
> + * Return 0 if the current CPU is affected by a HW erratum.
> + * A value of 0 is also returned if the current CPU does not
> + * support AMUs or if the counter is disabled. A return
> + * value of 0 at counter read is properly handled as an error
> + * case by the users of the counter.
> */
> *(u64 *)val = this_cpu_has_cap(ARM64_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_AMU_CONSTCNT) ?
> 0UL : read_constcnt();
> -- 2.43.0
>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@arm.com>
Thanks
Vladimir
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling
2026-10-01 11:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling Will Deacon
@ 2026-10-01 12:14 ` Vladimir Murzin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Vladimir Murzin @ 2026-10-01 12:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Will Deacon, Beata Michalska
Cc: suzuki.poulose, James.Morse, xuewen.yan94, seanwang1, linux-kernel
On 10/1/26 12:42, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 01, 2026 at 11:00:30AM +0200, Beata Michalska wrote:
>> This series factors out the existing Cortex-A510 erratum 2457168 AMU constant
>> counter workaround into a generic broken AMU constant-counter capability,
>> then wires Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 into the same handling.
> Thanks, Beata. These look good to me now and I'd like to include them
> in the next batch of arm64 fixes, but I'll give Vladimir a chance to
> have another look first...
>
LGTM as well :) Thanks Beata!
> Will
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling
2026-10-01 9:00 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling Beata Michalska
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2026-10-01 11:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling Will Deacon
@ 2026-10-01 15:50 ` Will Deacon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2026-10-01 15:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, Beata Michalska
Cc: catalin.marinas, mark.rutland, kernel-team, Will Deacon,
Vladimir.Murzin, suzuki.poulose, James.Morse, xuewen.yan94,
seanwang1, linux-kernel
On Thu, 01 Oct 2026 11:00:30 +0200, Beata Michalska wrote:
> This series factors out the existing Cortex-A510 erratum 2457168 AMU constant
> counter workaround into a generic broken AMU constant-counter capability,
> then wires Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 into the same handling.
>
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/2] arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/573371caf7ae
[2/2] arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/45f730467987
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-01 15:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-01 9:00 [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling Beata Michalska
2026-10-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] arm64: errata: Factor out broken AMU const counter cap Beata Michalska
2026-10-01 12:10 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-10-01 9:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] arm64: errata: Add Cortex-A725 erratum 3821522 workaround Beata Michalska
2026-10-01 12:12 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-10-01 11:42 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] arm64: errata: Share broken AMU constant-counter handling Will Deacon
2026-10-01 12:14 ` Vladimir Murzin
2026-10-01 15:50 ` Will Deacon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®