From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "shaju.abraham@nutanix.com" <shaju.abraham@nutanix.com>,
"khushit.shah@nutanix.com" <khushit.shah@nutanix.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>, "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kohler, Jon" <jon@nutanix.com>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] KVM: x86: Add x2APIC "features" to control EOI broadcast suppression
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 12:25:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d3b8fd036f05e9819f654c18853ff79a255c919d.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <352e189ec40fae044206b48ca6e68d77df7dced1.camel@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5596 bytes --]
On Wed, 2025-12-03 at 00:50 +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
> > -#define KVM_X2APIC_API_USE_32BIT_IDS (1ULL << 0)
> > -#define KVM_X2APIC_API_DISABLE_BROADCAST_QUIRK (1ULL << 1)
> > +#define KVM_X2APIC_API_USE_32BIT_IDS (_BITULL(0))
> > +#define KVM_X2APIC_API_DISABLE_BROADCAST_QUIRK (_BITULL(1))
> > +#define KVM_X2APIC_ENABLE_SUPPRESS_EOI_BROADCAST (_BITULL(2))
> > +#define KVM_X2APIC_DISABLE_SUPPRESS_EOI_BROADCAST (_BITULL(3))
>
> I hate to say, but wants to ask again:
>
> Since it's uAPI, are we expecting the two flags to have impact on in-kernel
> ioapic?
>
> I think there should no harm to make the two also apply to in-kernel ioapic.
>
> E.g., for now we can reject KVM_X2APIC_ENABLE_SUPPRESS_EOI_BROADCAST flag for
> in-kernel ioapic. In the future, we might add EOI register support to in-kernel
> ioapic and report supporting suppress EOI broadcast, then we can in-kernel
> ioapic to honor these two flags too.
I don't think we should leave that to the unspecified 'future'. Let's
fix the kernel I/O APIC to support the directed EOI at the same time,
rather than having an interim version of KVM which supports the
broadcast suppression but *not* the explicit EOI that replaces it.
Since I happened to have the I/O APIC PDFs in my recent history for
other reasons, and implemented these extra registers for version 0x20
in another userspace VMM within living memory, I figured I could try to
help with the actual implementation (untested, below).
There is some bikeshedding to be done on precisely *how* ->version_id
should be set. Maybe we shouldn't have the ->version_id field, and
should just check kvm->arch.suppress_eoi_broadcast to see which version
to report?
While I'm at looking at it, I see there's an
ASSERT(ent->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_LEVEL_TRIG) in the middle of
kvm_ioapic_update_eoi_one(), a few lines after it drops ioapic->lock
and then relocks it again. If it dropped the lock, doesn't that mean
the guest could have *changed* the mode in the interim, making that
ASSERT() guest-triggerable?
=====
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/ioapic: Implement support for I/O APIC version 0x20 with EOIR
As the weirdness with EOI broadcast suppression is being fixed in KVM,
also update the in-kernel I/O APIC to handle the directed EOI which
guests will need to use instead.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
---
arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h | 18 +++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
index 2c2783296aed..e82f74a8e57e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static unsigned long ioapic_read_indirect(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
switch (ioapic->ioregsel) {
case IOAPIC_REG_VERSION:
result = ((((IOAPIC_NUM_PINS - 1) & 0xff) << 16)
- | (IOAPIC_VERSION_ID & 0xff));
+ | ioapic->version_id);
break;
case IOAPIC_REG_APIC_ID:
@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ static unsigned long ioapic_read_indirect(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
result = ((ioapic->id & 0xf) << 24);
break;
+ case IOAPIC_REG_BOOT_CONFIG:
+ result = 0x01; /* Processor bus */
+ break;
+
default:
{
u32 redir_index = (ioapic->ioregsel - 0x10) >> 1;
@@ -695,6 +699,21 @@ static int ioapic_mmio_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_io_device *this,
ioapic_write_indirect(ioapic, data);
break;
+ case IOAPIC_REG_EOIR:
+ if (ioapic->version_id >= 0x20) {
+ u8 vector = data & 0xff;
+ int i;
+
+ rtc_irq_eoi(ioapic, vcpu, vector);
+ for (i = 0; i < IOAPIC_NUM_PINS; i++) {
+ union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *ent = &ioapic->redirtbl[i];
+
+ if (ent->fields.vector != vector)
+ continue;
+ kvm_ioapic_update_eoi_one(vcpu, ioapic, ent->fields.trig_mode, i);
+ }
+ }
+ break;
default:
break;
}
@@ -734,6 +753,7 @@ int kvm_ioapic_init(struct kvm *kvm)
spin_lock_init(&ioapic->lock);
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ioapic->eoi_inject, kvm_ioapic_eoi_inject_work);
INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&ioapic->mask_notifier_list);
+ ioapic->version_id = IOAPIC_VERSION_ID;
kvm->arch.vioapic = ioapic;
kvm_ioapic_reset(ioapic);
kvm_iodevice_init(&ioapic->dev, &ioapic_mmio_ops);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h
index bf28dbc11ff6..c8e44d726fbe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.h
@@ -19,13 +19,16 @@ struct kvm_vcpu;
#define IOAPIC_MEM_LENGTH 0x100
/* Direct registers. */
-#define IOAPIC_REG_SELECT 0x00
-#define IOAPIC_REG_WINDOW 0x10
+#define IOAPIC_REG_SELECT 0x00
+#define IOAPIC_REG_WINDOW 0x10
+#define IOAPIC_REG_IRQPA 0x20
+#define IOAPIC_REG_EOIR 0x40
-/* Indirect registers. */
-#define IOAPIC_REG_APIC_ID 0x00 /* x86 IOAPIC only */
-#define IOAPIC_REG_VERSION 0x01
-#define IOAPIC_REG_ARB_ID 0x02 /* x86 IOAPIC only */
+/* INDIRECT registers. */
+#define IOAPIC_REG_APIC_ID 0x00 /* x86 IOAPIC only */
+#define IOAPIC_REG_VERSION 0x01
+#define IOAPIC_REG_ARB_ID 0x02 /* x86 IOAPIC only */
+#define IOAPIC_REG_BOOT_CONFIG 0x03 /* x86 IOAPIC only */
/*ioapic delivery mode*/
#define IOAPIC_FIXED 0x0
@@ -76,7 +79,8 @@ struct kvm_ioapic {
u32 ioregsel;
u32 id;
u32 irr;
- u32 pad;
+ u8 version_id;
+ u8 pad[3];
union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry redirtbl[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
unsigned long irq_states[IOAPIC_NUM_PINS];
struct kvm_io_device dev;
--
2.43.0
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5069 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-03 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-25 18:05 Khushit Shah
2025-11-25 21:16 ` Huang, Kai
2025-12-02 9:13 ` David Woodhouse
2025-12-02 12:58 ` Khushit Shah
2025-12-02 13:31 ` David Woodhouse
2025-12-02 15:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-02 15:51 ` David Woodhouse
2025-12-02 16:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-02 17:10 ` David Woodhouse
2025-12-02 22:26 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-12-02 22:35 ` David Woodhouse
2025-12-03 0:50 ` Huang, Kai
2025-12-03 1:14 ` David Woodhouse
2025-12-03 12:25 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2025-12-03 13:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-12-03 13:32 ` David Woodhouse
2025-12-03 13:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-12-03 13:55 ` David Woodhouse
2025-12-03 7:45 ` Khushit Shah
2025-12-02 16:04 ` David Woodhouse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d3b8fd036f05e9819f654c18853ff79a255c919d.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jon@nutanix.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=khushit.shah@nutanix.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=shaju.abraham@nutanix.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®