* [PATCH] wifi: ath10k: fix lock protection in ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg()
@ 2026-01-23 16:02 Ziyi Guo
2026-01-23 17:26 ` Jeff Johnson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ziyi Guo @ 2026-01-23 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Johnson; +Cc: linux-wireless, ath10k, linux-kernel, Ziyi Guo
ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg() uses lockdep_assert_held() to
assert that ar->data_lock should be held by the caller, but neither
ath10k_wmi_10_2_op_rx() nor ath10k_wmi_10_4_op_rx() acquire this lock
before calling this function.
The field arsta->peer_ps_state is documented as protected by
ar->data_lock in core.h, and other accessors (ath10k_peer_ps_state_disable,
ath10k_dbg_sta_read_peer_ps_state) properly acquire this lock.
Add spin_lock_bh()/spin_unlock_bh() around the peer_ps_state update,
following the pattern used by other WMI event handlers in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Ziyi Guo <n7l8m4@u.northwestern.edu>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
index b4aad6604d6d..40259504927c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
@@ -5305,7 +5305,9 @@ ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
}
arsta = (struct ath10k_sta *)sta->drv_priv;
+ spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
arsta->peer_ps_state = __le32_to_cpu(ev->peer_ps_state);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
exit:
rcu_read_unlock();
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath10k: fix lock protection in ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg()
2026-01-23 16:02 [PATCH] wifi: ath10k: fix lock protection in ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg() Ziyi Guo
@ 2026-01-23 17:26 ` Jeff Johnson
[not found] ` <CAMFT1=b1fCiXFbMpo6+LJzbFkbLBWevcwiP=EP+hWX1FbRAEng@mail.gmail.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Johnson @ 2026-01-23 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ziyi Guo, Jeff Johnson; +Cc: linux-wireless, ath10k, linux-kernel
On 1/23/2026 8:02 AM, Ziyi Guo wrote:
> ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg() uses lockdep_assert_held() to
> assert that ar->data_lock should be held by the caller, but neither
> ath10k_wmi_10_2_op_rx() nor ath10k_wmi_10_4_op_rx() acquire this lock
> before calling this function.
>
> The field arsta->peer_ps_state is documented as protected by
> ar->data_lock in core.h, and other accessors (ath10k_peer_ps_state_disable,
> ath10k_dbg_sta_read_peer_ps_state) properly acquire this lock.
>
> Add spin_lock_bh()/spin_unlock_bh() around the peer_ps_state update,
> following the pattern used by other WMI event handlers in the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ziyi Guo <n7l8m4@u.northwestern.edu>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> index b4aad6604d6d..40259504927c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
> @@ -5305,7 +5305,9 @@ ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
>
> arsta = (struct ath10k_sta *)sta->drv_priv;
> + spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
> arsta->peer_ps_state = __le32_to_cpu(ev->peer_ps_state);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
>
> exit:
> rcu_read_unlock();
this solution is inconsistent with the lockdep_assert_held().
either the locking should be done by the callers or the lockdep_assert_held()
should be removed in conjunction with the new locking you are adding.
/jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath10k: fix lock protection in ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg()
[not found] ` <CAMFT1=b1fCiXFbMpo6+LJzbFkbLBWevcwiP=EP+hWX1FbRAEng@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2026-01-23 17:39 ` Jeff Johnson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Johnson @ 2026-01-23 17:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ziyi Guo; +Cc: Jeff Johnson, linux-wireless, ath10k, linux-kernel
On 1/23/2026 9:34 AM, Ziyi Guo wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for the review. I will adopt the second approach: remove the |
> lockdep_assert_held()| and add the |spin_lock_bh()| protection.
>
> I will send a v2 patch shortly.
>
> Best regards,
> Ziyi
Please follow linux kernel e-mail etiquette:
Don't top post
Don't send HTML e-mail.
https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-01-23 17:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-01-23 16:02 [PATCH] wifi: ath10k: fix lock protection in ath10k_wmi_event_peer_sta_ps_state_chg() Ziyi Guo
2026-01-23 17:26 ` Jeff Johnson
[not found] ` <CAMFT1=b1fCiXFbMpo6+LJzbFkbLBWevcwiP=EP+hWX1FbRAEng@mail.gmail.com>
2026-01-23 17:39 ` Jeff Johnson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®