* [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: i2s: Check before clk_unregister() not needed
@ 2022-05-27 6:54 Yihao Han
2022-05-29 8:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yihao Han @ 2022-05-27 6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Sylwester Nawrocki, Liam Girdwood,
Mark Brown, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, alsa-devel,
linux-kernel
Cc: Yihao Han
clk_unregister() already checks the clk ptr using
!clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)) so there is no need to check it
again before calling it.
Signed-off-by: Yihao Han <hanyihao@vivo.com>
---
sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c b/sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c
index 70c827162be4..84e21f7fc179 100644
--- a/sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c
+++ b/sound/soc/samsung/i2s.c
@@ -1247,8 +1247,7 @@ static void i2s_unregister_clocks(struct samsung_i2s_priv *priv)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < priv->clk_data.clk_num; i++) {
- if (!IS_ERR(priv->clk_table[i]))
- clk_unregister(priv->clk_table[i]);
+ clk_unregister(priv->clk_table[i]);
}
}
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: i2s: Check before clk_unregister() not needed
2022-05-27 6:54 [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: i2s: Check before clk_unregister() not needed Yihao Han
@ 2022-05-29 8:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-10 16:15 ` Christophe JAILLET
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2022-05-29 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yihao Han, Sylwester Nawrocki, Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown,
Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, alsa-devel, linux-kernel
On 27/05/2022 08:54, Yihao Han wrote:
> clk_unregister() already checks the clk ptr using
> !clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)) so there is no need to check it
> again before calling it.
>
No, this explanation does not make sense. clk_unregister() warns and
this code is not equivalent.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: i2s: Check before clk_unregister() not needed
2022-05-29 8:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2022-06-10 16:15 ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-06-10 19:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christophe JAILLET @ 2022-06-10 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Yihao Han, Sylwester Nawrocki,
Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
alsa-devel, linux-kernel
Le 29/05/2022 à 10:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
> On 27/05/2022 08:54, Yihao Han wrote:
>> clk_unregister() already checks the clk ptr using
>> !clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)) so there is no need to check it
>> again before calling it.
>>
>
> No, this explanation does not make sense. clk_unregister() warns and
> this code is not equivalent.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Hi,
Moreover, as pointed out by greg in [1] on some plateform the assertion
in the commit description is wrong. His message is about clk_disable()
but, IIUC, it makes sense for clk_unregister() as well. See [2] on the
sh plateform.
CJ
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/YqMIUOTU%2Fk5XpW3I@kroah.com/
[2]:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.18.3/source/drivers/sh/clk/core.c#L452
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: i2s: Check before clk_unregister() not needed
2022-06-10 16:15 ` Christophe JAILLET
@ 2022-06-10 19:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2022-06-10 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christophe JAILLET, Yihao Han, Sylwester Nawrocki, Liam Girdwood,
Mark Brown, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, alsa-devel,
linux-kernel
On 10/06/2022 18:15, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 29/05/2022 à 10:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski a écrit :
>> On 27/05/2022 08:54, Yihao Han wrote:
>>> clk_unregister() already checks the clk ptr using
>>> !clk || WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ERR(clk)) so there is no need to check it
>>> again before calling it.
>>>
>>
>> No, this explanation does not make sense. clk_unregister() warns and
>> this code is not equivalent.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Moreover, as pointed out by greg in [1] on some plateform the assertion
> in the commit description is wrong. His message is about clk_disable()
> but, IIUC, it makes sense for clk_unregister() as well. See [2] on the
> sh plateform.
>
Yes, this is true as well, although does not have the practical impact
on this driver as it uses platforms with common clock framework.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-06-10 19:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-27 6:54 [PATCH] ASoC: samsung: i2s: Check before clk_unregister() not needed Yihao Han
2022-05-29 8:06 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-06-10 16:15 ` Christophe JAILLET
2022-06-10 19:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®