From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: David Yang <mmyangfl@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: hisi-festa: Add support for HiSilicon Festa PHYs
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 15:59:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5ec2ec2-65a0-6ad3-a0a3-cad57d7f6616@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230317143042.291260-1-mmyangfl@gmail.com>
On 17.03.2023 15:30, David Yang wrote:
> HiSilicon Festa PHYs were used on some HiSilicon SoCs. This patch injects
> firmwares found on vendor kernels.
>
What's the status of adding the firmware files to linux-firmware?
I don't see any related patch in the linux-firmware mailing list archive.
Any info on purpose of firmware? Does the PHY work normally also
w/o firmware? Or is the firmware required?
> Signed-off-by: David Yang <mmyangfl@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 5 ++
> drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/net/phy/hisi-festa.c | 169 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 175 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/net/phy/hisi-festa.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> index 54874555c..e7551e9b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
> @@ -177,6 +177,11 @@ config DAVICOM_PHY
> help
> Currently supports dm9161e and dm9131
>
> +config HISI_FESTA_PHY
> + tristate "HiSilicon Festa PHYs"
> + help
> + Supports the HiSilicon Festa PHYs.
> +
> config ICPLUS_PHY
> tristate "ICPlus PHYs"
> help
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Makefile b/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
> index b5138066b..2c5aded6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Makefile
> @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DP83869_PHY) += dp83869.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DP83TC811_PHY) += dp83tc811.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DP83TD510_PHY) += dp83td510.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_FIXED_PHY) += fixed_phy.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_FESTA_PHY) += hisi-festa.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_ICPLUS_PHY) += icplus.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_XWAY_PHY) += intel-xway.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_LSI_ET1011C_PHY) += et1011c.o
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/hisi-festa.c b/drivers/net/phy/hisi-festa.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..ab54ed3ca
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/hisi-festa.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,169 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later OR MIT
> +/*
> + * Driver for HiSilicon Festa PHYs
> + *
> + * This module does nothing than firmware injection. If you don't use firmware,
> + * simply blacklist this module.
That's not an appropriate hint. Relevant is the answer to the question
whether firmware is required.
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2023 David Yang
> + */
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/firmware.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/mii.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/phy.h>
> +
> +#define PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV200 0x20669813
> +#define PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV220 0x20669823
> +#define PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV300 0x20669833
> +#define PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV320 0x20669843
> +#define PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV330 0x20669853
> +#define PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV331 0x20669863
> +
> +#define MII_EXPMD 0x1d /* Expanded memory data */
> +#define MII_EXPMA 0x1e /* Expanded memory address */
> +
> +/* bus->mdio_lock should be locked when using this function */
> +static inline int hisi_festa_read_expanded(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 addr)
No inline keyword please, let the compiler decide.
> +{
> + __phy_write(phydev, MII_EXPMA, addr);
> + return __phy_read(phydev, MII_EXPMD);
> +}
> +
> +/* bus->mdio_lock should be locked when using this function */
> +static inline int hisi_festa_write_expanded(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 addr, u8 val)
Why return type int and not void?
> +{
> + __phy_write(phydev, MII_EXPMA, addr);
> + __phy_write(phydev, MII_EXPMD, val);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* bus->mdio_lock should be locked when using this function */
> +static inline int hisi_festa_write_expanded_mem(struct phy_device *phydev, u16 addr,
> + const u8 *data, int len)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> + hisi_festa_write_expanded(phydev, addr + i, data[i]);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int hisi_festa_write_fw(struct phy_device *phydev, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> + static const u8 prologue[] = {0xbd, 0x34, 0x00, 0x39};
> + int ret;
> +
> + phy_lock_mdio_bus(phydev);
> +
> + ret = __phy_set_bits(phydev, MII_BMCR, BMCR_PDOWN);
Why power down the PHY?
> + if (ret) {
> + phydev_err(phydev, "cannot suspend device\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + hisi_festa_write_expanded_mem(phydev, 0x33f9, prologue, sizeof(prologue));
> + /* mask jump instruction */
> + hisi_festa_write_expanded(phydev, 0x3400, 0x39);
> + hisi_festa_write_expanded_mem(phydev, 0x3401, fw->data + 1, fw->size - 1);
> + /* now release firmware */
> + hisi_festa_write_expanded(phydev, 0x3400, fw->data[0]);
> + hisi_festa_write_expanded(phydev, 0x33f8, 0x01);
> +
> + ret = __phy_clear_bits(phydev, MII_BMCR, BMCR_PDOWN);
Or do a soft reset here?
> +
> +out:
> + phy_unlock_mdio_bus(phydev);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int hisi_festa_patch_fw(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + char fw_name[64];
> + const struct firmware *fw;
> +
reverse x-mas tree
> + snprintf(fw_name, sizeof(fw_name), "hisilicon/festa.%08x.ucode", phydev->phy_id);
> +
> + ret = request_firmware(&fw, fw_name, &phydev->mdio.dev);
Any option to detect whether firmware is loaded already?
> + if (ret) {
> + /* err message already printed by request_firmware */
> + return -EAGAIN;
> + }
> +
> + if (fw->data[0] != 0x01 || fw->data[1] != 0xcc) {
> + phydev_err(phydev, "%s does not look like valid firmware; refused to load\n",
> + fw_name);
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + ret = hisi_festa_write_fw(phydev, fw);
> + if (ret) {
> + phydev_err(phydev, "download firmware %s failed\n", fw_name);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + phydev_info(phydev, "using firmware %s\n", fw_name);
> +
> +out:
> + release_firmware(fw);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int hisi_festa_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
> +{
> + hisi_festa_patch_fw(phydev);
> + /* ok, use programmed firmware */
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static struct phy_driver hisi_festa_driver[] = {
> + {
> + PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV200),
> + .name = "HiSilicon Festa v200/v210",
> + .config_init = hisi_festa_config_init,
How about callbacks like suspend/resume?
> + },
> + {
> + PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV220),
> + .name = "HiSilicon Festa v220",
> + .config_init = hisi_festa_config_init,
> + },
> + {
> + PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV300),
> + .name = "HiSilicon Festa v300",
> + .config_init = hisi_festa_config_init,
> + },
> + {
> + PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV320),
> + .name = "HiSilicon Festa v320",
> + .config_init = hisi_festa_config_init,
> + },
> + {
> + PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV330),
> + .name = "HiSilicon Festa v330",
> + .config_init = hisi_festa_config_init,
> + },
> + {
> + PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV331),
> + .name = "HiSilicon Festa v331",
> + .config_init = hisi_festa_config_init,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +module_phy_driver(hisi_festa_driver);
> +
> +static struct mdio_device_id __maybe_unused hisi_festa_tbl[] = {
> + { PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV200) },
> + { PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV220) },
> + { PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV300) },
> + { PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV320) },
> + { PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV330) },
> + { PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_HISILICON_FESTAV331) },
> + { }
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(mdio, hisi_festa_tbl);
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("HiSilicon Festa PHY driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual MIT/GPL");
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-17 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-17 14:30 David Yang
2023-03-17 14:59 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2023-03-17 15:29 ` Yangfl
2023-03-17 16:28 ` Francois Romieu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d5ec2ec2-65a0-6ad3-a0a3-cad57d7f6616@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mmyangfl@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®