From: Sodagudi Prasad <psodagud@codeaurora.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clockevents: Always call clockevents_program_event
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2017 02:21:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d5f08a2df403acaabf8fbe5a79e33806@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1710241034350.2369@nanos>
On 2017-10-24 01:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2017, Prasad Sodagudi wrote:
>
>> Currently tick_program_event function is not calling
>> clockevents_program_event when 'expires == KTIME_MAX',
>> it is just updating clockevent state to
>> CLOCK_EVT_STATE_ONESHOT_STOPPED.
>> clockevents_program_event function updates clockevent
>> device next_event by checking clockevent device state,
>> so always call clockevents_program_event() from tick_program_event.
>
> No. This is fundmentally wrong. If the clockevent is in oneshot stopped
> mode then you cannot call clockevents_program_event(). There is even a
> warning in that code which will trigger.
<Prasad> Yes. There is warning and I overlooked at that part of the code
and thought
it would return from the clockevents_program_event function after
next_event update.
dev->next_event = expires;
if (clockevent_state_shutdown(dev))
return 0;
Thanks tglx for reviewing patch.
How to clean next next_event from clockevent device in the
ONESHOT_STOPPED state from tick_program_event()?
Shall I update the next patch set with following condition? Or Any
other suggestions to fix this path?
diff --git a/kernel/time/clockevents.c b/kernel/time/clockevents.c
index 4237e07..21104b6 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clockevents.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clockevents.c
@@ -317,7 +317,8 @@ int clockevents_program_event(struct
clock_event_device *dev, ktime_t expires,
dev->next_event = expires;
- if (clockevent_state_shutdown(dev))
+ if (clockevent_state_shutdown(dev) ||
+ clockevent_state_oneshot_stopped(dev))
return 0;
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-24 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-24 4:33 clock event device’s next_event Sodagudi Prasad
2017-10-24 7:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-24 7:56 ` Sodagudi Prasad
2017-10-24 8:06 ` [PATCH] Clockevents: Always call clockevents_program_event Prasad Sodagudi
2017-10-24 8:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-24 9:21 ` Sodagudi Prasad [this message]
2017-10-24 10:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-26 18:37 ` [PATCH] clockevents: Update clockevents device next_event Prasad Sodagudi
2017-11-01 17:25 ` [tip:timers/core] clockevents: Update clockevents device next_event on stop tip-bot for Prasad Sodagudi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d5f08a2df403acaabf8fbe5a79e33806@codeaurora.org \
--to=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome