[PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation

[PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation

[Raphael Norwitz]

The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses" instead
of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
aforementioned wording.

Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
---
 Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing identical callback
 mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
 handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
 
-Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
+Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
 hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
 be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
 interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
-- 
2.9.3

Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation

[Marc Zyngier]

On 2020-08-19 22:53, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
> loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
> It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses" 
> instead
> of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
> aforementioned wording.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing
> identical callback
>  mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
>  handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
> 
> -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
> +Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
>  hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
>  be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
>  interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the

Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation

[Raphael Norwitz]

Ping - looks like this was never applied?

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 6:23 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-19 22:53, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> > The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
> > loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
> > It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses"
> > instead
> > of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
> > aforementioned wording.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing
> > identical callback
> >  mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
> >  handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
> >
> > -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
> > +Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
> >  hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
> >  be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
> >  interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>
>          M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...