mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	"Christian Loehle" <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
	Koba Ko <kobak@nvidia.com>,
	"Felix Abecassis" <fabecassis@nvidia.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbirs@nvidia.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Prefer fully-idle SMT cores in asym-capacity idle selection
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 16:44:01 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d947a158-6f33-4657-98c9-a9f8adfdd9fe@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <acZixordtNyJPOrx@gpd4>

Hello Andrea,

On 3/27/2026 4:28 PM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2026 at 04:14:57PM +0530, K Prateek Nayak wrote:
>> Hello Andrea,
>>
>> On 3/26/2026 8:32 PM, Andrea Righi wrote:
>>>             /* This CPU fits with all requirements */
>>> -           if (fits > 0)
>>> -                   return cpu;
>>> +           if (fits > 0) {
>>> +                   if (prefer_idle_cores && on_idle_core)
>>> +                           return cpu;
>>> +                   if (!prefer_idle_cores)
>>> +                           return cpu;
>>
>> nit.
>>
>> Can the above two be re-wittern as:
>>
>>     if (!prefer_idle_cores || on_idle_core)
>>         return cpu;
>>
>> since they are equivalent.
> 
> Oh yes, indeed.

Also, can we just rewrite this Patch as:

  (Includes feedback from Vincent; Only build tested)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 700d0f145ca6..cffd5649b54e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -7946,6 +7946,7 @@ static int select_idle_cpu(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, bool
 static int
 select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 {
+	bool prefers_idle_core = sched_smt_active() && test_idle_cores(target);
 	unsigned long task_util, util_min, util_max, best_cap = 0;
 	int fits, best_fits = 0;
 	int cpu, best_cpu = -1;
@@ -7959,6 +7960,7 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 	util_max = uclamp_eff_value(p, UCLAMP_MAX);
 
 	for_each_cpu_wrap(cpu, cpus, target) {
+		bool preferred_core = !prefers_idle_core || is_core_idle(cpu);
 		unsigned long cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu);
 
 		if (!choose_idle_cpu(cpu, p))
@@ -7967,7 +7969,7 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 		fits = util_fits_cpu(task_util, util_min, util_max, cpu);
 
 		/* This CPU fits with all requirements */
-		if (fits > 0)
+		if (fits > 0 && preferred_core)
 			return cpu;
 		/*
 		 * Only the min performance hint (i.e. uclamp_min) doesn't fit.
@@ -7976,6 +7978,14 @@ select_idle_capacity(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 		else if (fits < 0)
 			cpu_cap = get_actual_cpu_capacity(cpu);
 
+		/*
+		 * If we are on an preferred core, translate the range of fits
+		 * from [-1, 1] to [-4, -2]. This ensures that an idle core
+		 * is always given priority over (paritally) busy core.
+		 */
+		if (preferred_core)
+			fits -= 3;
+
 		/*
 		 * First, select CPU which fits better (-1 being better than 0).
 		 * Then, select the one with best capacity at same level.
---

My naive eyes say it should be equivalent of what you have but maybe
I'm wrong?

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek


  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-27 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-26 15:02 [PATCH 0/4] sched/fair: SMT-aware asymmetric CPU capacity Andrea Righi
2026-03-26 15:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/fair: Prefer fully-idle SMT cores in asym-capacity idle selection Andrea Righi
2026-03-27  8:09   ` Vincent Guittot
2026-03-27  9:46     ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-27 10:44   ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-27 10:58     ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-27 11:14       ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-03-27 16:39         ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-30 10:17           ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-30 13:07             ` Vincent Guittot
2026-03-30 13:22             ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-30 13:46               ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-26 15:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/fair: Reject misfit pulls onto busy SMT siblings on asym-capacity Andrea Righi
2026-03-26 15:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/fair: Enable EAS with SMT on SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY systems Andrea Righi
2026-03-27  8:09   ` Vincent Guittot
2026-03-27  9:45     ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-26 15:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/fair: Prefer fully-idle SMT core for NOHZ idle load balancer Andrea Righi
2026-03-27  8:45   ` Vincent Guittot
2026-03-27  9:44     ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-27 11:34       ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-03-27 20:36         ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-27 22:45           ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-30 17:29         ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-27 13:44   ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-26 16:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] sched/fair: SMT-aware asymmetric CPU capacity Christian Loehle
2026-03-27  6:52   ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-27 16:31 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-27 17:08   ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-28  6:51     ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-03-28 13:03 ` Balbir Singh
2026-03-28 22:50   ` Andrea Righi
2026-03-29 21:36     ` Balbir Singh
2026-03-30 22:30 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-03-31  9:04   ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-01 11:57     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-01 12:08       ` Vincent Guittot
2026-04-01 12:42         ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-01 13:12           ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-03 11:47             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-03 14:45               ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-03 20:44                 ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-07 11:50                   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2026-04-07 19:16                     ` Andrea Righi
2026-04-03 11:47           ` Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d947a158-6f33-4657-98c9-a9f8adfdd9fe@amd.com \
    --to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=fabecassis@nvidia.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox