* [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: at91: add lan966 pcb8385 board
2025-11-26 10:01 [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: add support for pcb8385 Horatiu Vultur
@ 2025-11-26 10:01 ` Horatiu Vultur
2025-11-26 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385 Horatiu Vultur
2025-11-26 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: add " Rob Herring
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Horatiu Vultur @ 2025-11-26 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, nicolas.ferre, alexandre.belloni,
claudiu.beznea, wsa+renesas, Ryan.Wanner, romain.sioen
Cc: devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Horatiu Vultur
Add documentation for Microchip LAN9668 PCB8385
Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
index 3a34b7a2e8d4e..68d306d17c2a1 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml
@@ -235,9 +235,11 @@ properties:
- const: microchip,lan9662
- const: microchip,lan966
- - description: Microchip LAN9668 PCB8290 Evaluation Board.
+ - description: Microchip LAN9668 Evaluation Board.
items:
- - const: microchip,lan9668-pcb8290
+ - enum:
+ - microchip,lan9668-pcb8290
+ - microchip,lan9668-pcb8385
- const: microchip,lan9668
- const: microchip,lan966
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385
2025-11-26 10:01 [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: add support for pcb8385 Horatiu Vultur
2025-11-26 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: at91: add lan966 pcb8385 board Horatiu Vultur
@ 2025-11-26 10:01 ` Horatiu Vultur
2025-11-26 10:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-26 22:46 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: add " Rob Herring
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Horatiu Vultur @ 2025-11-26 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, nicolas.ferre, alexandre.belloni,
claudiu.beznea, wsa+renesas, Ryan.Wanner, romain.sioen
Cc: devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Horatiu Vultur
Add basic support for pcb8385 [1]. It is a modular board which allows
to add different daughter cards on which there are different PHYs.
This adds support for UART, LEDs and I2C.
[1] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/development-tool/ev83e85a
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile | 3 +-
.../boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts | 133 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
index 79cd38fdc7dab..08986c24a4700 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
@@ -102,4 +102,5 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_LAN966) += \
lan966x-kontron-kswitch-d10-mmt-8g.dtb \
lan966x-pcb8290.dtb \
lan966x-pcb8291.dtb \
- lan966x-pcb8309.dtb
+ lan966x-pcb8309.dtb \
+ lan966x-pcb8385.dtb
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..a7ac7854cdaf0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
+/*
+ * lan966x-pcb8385.dts - Device Tree file for PCB8385
+ */
+/dts-v1/;
+
+#include "lan966x.dtsi"
+#include "dt-bindings/phy/phy-lan966x-serdes.h"
+
+/ {
+ model = "Microchip EVB - LAN9668";
+ compatible = "microchip,lan9668-pcb8385", "microchip,lan9668", "microchip,lan966";
+
+ aliases {
+ serial0 = &usart3;
+ };
+
+ chosen {
+ stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
+ };
+
+ gpio-restart {
+ compatible = "gpio-restart";
+ gpios = <&gpio 59 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ open-source;
+ priority = <200>;
+ };
+
+ leds {
+ compatible = "gpio-leds";
+
+ led-p1-green {
+ label = "cu0:green";
+ gpios = <&sgpio_out 2 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ default-state = "off";
+ };
+
+ led-p1-yellow {
+ label = "cu0:yellow";
+ gpios = <&sgpio_out 2 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ default-state = "off";
+ };
+
+ led-p2-green {
+ label = "cu1:green";
+ gpios = <&sgpio_out 3 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ default-state = "off";
+ };
+
+ led-p2-yellow {
+ label = "cu1:yellow";
+ gpios = <&sgpio_out 3 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
+ default-state = "off";
+ };
+ };
+};
+
+&aes {
+ status = "disabled"; /* Reserved by secure OS */
+};
+
+&flx0 {
+ atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_TWI>;
+ status = "okay";
+
+ i2c0: i2c@600 {
+ pinctrl-0 = <&fc0_b_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ dmas = <0>, <0>;
+ i2c-analog-filter;
+ i2c-digital-filter;
+ i2c-digital-filter-width-ns = <35>;
+ i2c-sda-hold-time-ns = <1500>;
+ status = "okay";
+
+ eeprom@54 {
+ compatible = "atmel,24c01";
+ reg = <0x54>;
+ status = "okay";
+ };
+
+ eeprom@55 {
+ compatible = "atmel,24c01";
+ reg = <0x55>;
+ status = "okay";
+ };
+ };
+};
+
+&flx3 {
+ atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_USART>;
+ status = "okay";
+
+ usart3: serial@200 {
+ pinctrl-0 = <&fc3_b_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ status = "okay";
+ };
+};
+
+&gpio {
+ fc0_b_pins: fc0-b-pins {
+ /* SCL, SDA */
+ pins = "GPIO_25", "GPIO_26";
+ function = "fc0_b";
+ };
+
+ fc3_b_pins: fc3-b-pins {
+ /* RX, TX */
+ pins = "GPIO_52", "GPIO_53";
+ function = "fc3_b";
+ };
+
+ sgpio_a_pins: sgpio-a-pins {
+ /* SCK, D0, D1, LD */
+ pins = "GPIO_32", "GPIO_33", "GPIO_34", "GPIO_35";
+ function = "sgpio_a";
+ };
+};
+
+&sgpio {
+ pinctrl-0 = <&sgpio_a_pins>;
+ pinctrl-names = "default";
+ microchip,sgpio-port-ranges = <0 3>;
+ status = "okay";
+
+ gpio@0 {
+ ngpios = <64>;
+ };
+ gpio@1 {
+ ngpios = <64>;
+ };
+};
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385
2025-11-26 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385 Horatiu Vultur
@ 2025-11-26 10:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-27 9:24 ` Horatiu Vultur
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-11-26 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Horatiu Vultur, robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, nicolas.ferre,
alexandre.belloni, claudiu.beznea, wsa+renesas, Ryan.Wanner,
romain.sioen
Cc: devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 26/11/2025 11:01, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Add basic support for pcb8385 [1]. It is a modular board which allows
> to add different daughter cards on which there are different PHYs.
> This adds support for UART, LEDs and I2C.
>
> [1] https://www.microchip.com/en-us/development-tool/ev83e85a
>
> Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile | 3 +-
> .../boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts | 133 ++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
> index 79cd38fdc7dab..08986c24a4700 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
> @@ -102,4 +102,5 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_LAN966) += \
> lan966x-kontron-kswitch-d10-mmt-8g.dtb \
> lan966x-pcb8290.dtb \
> lan966x-pcb8291.dtb \
> - lan966x-pcb8309.dtb
> + lan966x-pcb8309.dtb \
> + lan966x-pcb8385.dtb
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..a7ac7854cdaf0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * lan966x-pcb8385.dts - Device Tree file for PCB8385
> + */
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "lan966x.dtsi"
> +#include "dt-bindings/phy/phy-lan966x-serdes.h"
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Microchip EVB - LAN9668";
> + compatible = "microchip,lan9668-pcb8385", "microchip,lan9668", "microchip,lan966";
> +
> + aliases {
> + serial0 = &usart3;
> + };
> +
> + chosen {
> + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> + };
> +
> + gpio-restart {
> + compatible = "gpio-restart";
> + gpios = <&gpio 59 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + open-source;
> + priority = <200>;
> + };
> +
> + leds {
> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
> +
> + led-p1-green {
> + label = "cu0:green";
> + gpios = <&sgpio_out 2 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + default-state = "off";
> + };
> +
> + led-p1-yellow {
> + label = "cu0:yellow";
> + gpios = <&sgpio_out 2 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + default-state = "off";
> + };
> +
> + led-p2-green {
> + label = "cu1:green";
> + gpios = <&sgpio_out 3 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + default-state = "off";
> + };
> +
> + led-p2-yellow {
> + label = "cu1:yellow";
> + gpios = <&sgpio_out 3 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + default-state = "off";
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&aes {
> + status = "disabled"; /* Reserved by secure OS */
> +};
> +
> +&flx0 {
> + atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_TWI>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + i2c0: i2c@600 {
You added a label, so this feels like a new node, but then you miss
compatible and status feels redundant.
If this is override, you should rather override by labels/phandles in
the first place. Even when overriding by full node path, you should not
add custom labels - they belong to the base SoC.
> + pinctrl-0 = <&fc0_b_pins>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> + dmas = <0>, <0>;
> + i2c-analog-filter;
> + i2c-digital-filter;
> + i2c-digital-filter-width-ns = <35>;
> + i2c-sda-hold-time-ns = <1500>;
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + eeprom@54 {
> + compatible = "atmel,24c01";
> + reg = <0x54>;
> + status = "okay";
Why? Was it disabled anywhere?
> + };
> +
> + eeprom@55 {
> + compatible = "atmel,24c01";
> + reg = <0x55>;
> + status = "okay";
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385
2025-11-26 10:24 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-11-27 9:24 ` Horatiu Vultur
2025-11-28 9:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Horatiu Vultur @ 2025-11-27 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, nicolas.ferre, alexandre.belloni,
claudiu.beznea, wsa+renesas, Ryan.Wanner, romain.sioen,
devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
The 11/26/2025 11:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
Hi Krzysztof,
> > +
> > +&flx0 {
> > + atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_TWI>;
> > + status = "okay";
> > +
> > + i2c0: i2c@600 {
>
> You added a label, so this feels like a new node, but then you miss
> compatible and status feels redundant.
Ah.. OK. I didn't want to add a new node.
>
> If this is override, you should rather override by labels/phandles in
> the first place. Even when overriding by full node path, you should not
> add custom labels - they belong to the base SoC.
I can remove the label.
So, when I want to override or extend with new properties I should
labels?
>
> > + pinctrl-0 = <&fc0_b_pins>;
> > + pinctrl-names = "default";
> > + dmas = <0>, <0>;
> > + i2c-analog-filter;
> > + i2c-digital-filter;
> > + i2c-digital-filter-width-ns = <35>;
> > + i2c-sda-hold-time-ns = <1500>;
> > + status = "okay";
>
> > +
> > + eeprom@54 {
> > + compatible = "atmel,24c01";
> > + reg = <0x54>;
> > + status = "okay";
>
> Why? Was it disabled anywhere?
It wasn't disabled anywhere. I will remove this.
>
> > + };
> > +
> > + eeprom@55 {
> > + compatible = "atmel,24c01";
> > + reg = <0x55>;
> > + status = "okay";
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
>
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
/Horatiu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385
2025-11-27 9:24 ` Horatiu Vultur
@ 2025-11-28 9:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-11-28 13:04 ` Horatiu Vultur
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-11-28 9:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Horatiu Vultur
Cc: robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, nicolas.ferre, alexandre.belloni,
claudiu.beznea, wsa+renesas, Ryan.Wanner, romain.sioen,
devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 27/11/2025 10:24, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 11/26/2025 11:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
>>> +
>>> +&flx0 {
>>> + atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_TWI>;
>>> + status = "okay";
>>> +
>>> + i2c0: i2c@600 {
>>
>> You added a label, so this feels like a new node, but then you miss
>> compatible and status feels redundant.
>
> Ah.. OK. I didn't want to add a new node.
>
>>
>> If this is override, you should rather override by labels/phandles in
>> the first place. Even when overriding by full node path, you should not
>> add custom labels - they belong to the base SoC.
>
> I can remove the label.
> So, when I want to override or extend with new properties I should
> labels?
Yes, child of serial engine should still be extended by label/phandle,
unless this SoC subsystem has different rule.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385
2025-11-28 9:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-11-28 13:04 ` Horatiu Vultur
2025-11-29 9:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Horatiu Vultur @ 2025-11-28 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, nicolas.ferre, alexandre.belloni,
claudiu.beznea, wsa+renesas, Ryan.Wanner, romain.sioen,
devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
The 11/28/2025 10:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 27/11/2025 10:24, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > The 11/26/2025 11:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> >>> +
> >>> +&flx0 {
> >>> + atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_TWI>;
> >>> + status = "okay";
> >>> +
> >>> + i2c0: i2c@600 {
> >>
> >> You added a label, so this feels like a new node, but then you miss
> >> compatible and status feels redundant.
> >
> > Ah.. OK. I didn't want to add a new node.
> >
> >>
> >> If this is override, you should rather override by labels/phandles in
> >> the first place. Even when overriding by full node path, you should not
> >> add custom labels - they belong to the base SoC.
> >
> > I can remove the label.
> > So, when I want to override or extend with new properties I should
> > labels?
>
>
> Yes, child of serial engine should still be extended by label/phandle,
> unless this SoC subsystem has different rule.
What do you mean by "child of serial engine"?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
/Horatiu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385
2025-11-28 13:04 ` Horatiu Vultur
@ 2025-11-29 9:15 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-11-29 9:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Horatiu Vultur
Cc: robh, krzk+dt, conor+dt, nicolas.ferre, alexandre.belloni,
claudiu.beznea, wsa+renesas, Ryan.Wanner, romain.sioen,
devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On 28/11/2025 14:04, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> The 11/28/2025 10:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On 27/11/2025 10:24, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
>>> The 11/26/2025 11:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof,
>>>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +&flx0 {
>>>>> + atmel,flexcom-mode = <ATMEL_FLEXCOM_MODE_TWI>;
>>>>> + status = "okay";
>>>>> +
>>>>> + i2c0: i2c@600 {
>>>>
>>>> You added a label, so this feels like a new node, but then you miss
>>>> compatible and status feels redundant.
>>>
>>> Ah.. OK. I didn't want to add a new node.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If this is override, you should rather override by labels/phandles in
>>>> the first place. Even when overriding by full node path, you should not
>>>> add custom labels - they belong to the base SoC.
>>>
>>> I can remove the label.
>>> So, when I want to override or extend with new properties I should
>>> labels?
>>
>>
>> Yes, child of serial engine should still be extended by label/phandle,
>> unless this SoC subsystem has different rule.
>
> What do you mean by "child of serial engine"?
flx is your serial engine, no? It's child is i2c or whatever other
interface.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: add support for pcb8385
2025-11-26 10:01 [PATCH v3 0/2] ARM: add support for pcb8385 Horatiu Vultur
2025-11-26 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: at91: add lan966 pcb8385 board Horatiu Vultur
2025-11-26 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385 Horatiu Vultur
@ 2025-11-26 22:46 ` Rob Herring
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2025-11-26 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Horatiu Vultur
Cc: conor+dt, wsa+renesas, devicetree, linux-kernel,
linux-arm-kernel, Ryan.Wanner, romain.sioen, nicolas.ferre,
claudiu.beznea, alexandre.belloni, krzk+dt
On Wed, 26 Nov 2025 11:01:49 +0100, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> Add pcb8385 and the documentation for it.
> This is a moduler board on which it can add different daughter cards.
>
> v2->v3:
> - remove the linux,default-trigger properties
>
> v1->v2:
> - sort nodes in alphanumerical order
> - move the eeprom nodes under i2c0
>
> Horatiu Vultur (2):
> dt-bindings: arm: at91: add lan966 pcb8385 board
> ARM: dts: Add support for pcb8385
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-at91.yaml | 6 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile | 3 +-
> .../boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts | 133 ++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dts
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
>
My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
series.
Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
unless the platform maintainer has comments.
If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
make sure dt-schema is up to date:
pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
This patch series was applied (using b4) to base:
Base: attempting to guess base-commit...
Base: tags/next-20251124 (exact match)
Base: tags/next-20251124 (use --merge-base to override)
If this is not the correct base, please add 'base-commit' tag
(or use b4 which does this automatically)
New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/' for 20251126100151.1559590-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com:
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: /soc/usb@200000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['microchip,lan9662-udc', 'atmel,sama5d3-udc']
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: /soc/usb@200000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['microchip,lan9662-udc', 'atmel,sama5d3-udc']
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): $nodename:0: 'serial@200' does not match '^spi(@.*|-([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]+))?$'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): False schema does not allow 32
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): $nodename:0: 'serial@200' does not match '^spi(@.*|-([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]+))?$'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): False schema does not allow 32
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: rng@e0048000 (atmel,at91sam9g45-trng): 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
'interrupts' is a required property
'interrupts-extended' is a required property
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/rng/atmel,at91-trng.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): $nodename:0: 'serial@200' does not match '^spi(@.*|-([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]+))?$'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): False schema does not allow 32
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): $nodename:0: 'serial@200' does not match '^spi(@.*|-([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]+))?$'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): False schema does not allow 32
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): '#size-cells' is a required property
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): '#address-cells' is a required property
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): 'atmel,usart-mode' is a required property
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): $nodename:0: 'serial@200' does not match '^spi(@.*|-([0-9]|[1-9][0-9]+))?$'
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
arch/arm/boot/dts/microchip/lan966x-pcb8385.dtb: serial@200 (atmel,at91sam9260-usart): False schema does not allow 32
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/serial/atmel,at91-usart.yaml
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread