mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v18 02/14] arm64: ptrace: Rework audit_syscall_entry()
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 09:24:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dacc53d7-cb2c-4861-8813-8aff63e955bb@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260919164319.90193-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com>



在 2026/9/20 0:43, Karl Mehltretter 写道:
>> +	if (unlikely(audit_context()))
>> +		syscall_enter_audit(regs);
> 
> With arm64 defconfig and CONFIG_AUDIT=n on v7.3-rc1, building
> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.o after this patch fails with GCC 15.2.0:
> 
> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c: In function ‘syscall_trace_enter’:
> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c:2491:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘syscall_enter_audit’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>  2491 |                 syscall_enter_audit(regs);
>       |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> The helper is defined only under CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL, but this call
> remains when auditing is disabled. The audit_context() check does not
> avoid the missing declaration.
> 
> Could the helper get an audit-disabled stub, or could this call be
> guarded as well?

Hi Karl,

Thank you for pointing out this issue.

We discussed a similar problem with generic entry in the link below.
Thomas believed it appears to be a compiler problem, and we originally
planned to fix it using __always_inline. I will fix it following the
same approach used for generic entry.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/87tso45bqq.ffs@fw13/

Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260720094921.537716-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260721040118.1000554-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com/

> 
> The same object builds after patches 1 and 13. Patch 12 still fails
> with the missing declaration. Patch 13 removes the affected code, but
> the intermediate commits should remain buildable.
> 
> Thanks,
> Karl

-- 
Best regards,
Jinjie


  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-20  1:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-02  9:55 [PATCH v18 00/14] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 01/14] arm64: ptrace: Fix redundant syscall exit stop for PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 02/14] arm64: ptrace: Rework audit_syscall_entry() Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-19 16:43   ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-09-20  1:24     ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 03/14] arm64: ptrace: Open-code seccomp check in syscall_trace_enter() Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 04/14] arm64: ptrace: Rename and clean up syscall_trace_enter() Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 05/14] arm64: ptrace: Protect rseq_syscall() from tracer PC modifications Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 06/14] arm64: syscall: Rework the syscall exit path in el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 07/14] arm64: ptrace: Pass thread flags to trace enter/exit Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 08/14] arm64: ptrace: Extract arm64_syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work() helper Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 09/14] arm64: ptrace: Align syscall exit work semantics with generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 10/14] arm64: syscall: Use exit-specific flags check in el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 11/14] arm64: syscall: Simplify el0_svc_common() syscall exit path Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 12/14] arm64: ptrace: Make return type of arm64_syscall_trace_enter() bool Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 13/14] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-02  9:55 ` [PATCH v18 14/14] arm64: Inline el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2026-09-15 13:03 ` [PATCH v18 00/14] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Jinjie Ruan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dacc53d7-cb2c-4861-8813-8aff63e955bb@huawei.com \
    --to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®