From: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.com>
To: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Cc: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>,
kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] KVM: VMX: Allow direct access to MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 01:24:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e28c13c4-4a04-8a41-2a5c-16509e1bad0e@amazon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a8f25ab3-0b1d-a248-9564-238e3dca3da4@amazon.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1855 bytes --]
On 01/31/2018 11:52 PM, KarimAllah Ahmed wrote:
> On 01/31/2018 09:18 PM, Jim Mattson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:01 PM, KarimAllah Ahmed
>> <karahmed@amazon.com> wrote:
>>
>>> but save_spec_ctrl_on_exit is also set for L2 write. So once L2 writes
>>> to it, this condition will be true and then the bitmap will be updated.
>>
>> So if L1 or any L2 writes to the MSR, then save_spec_ctrl_on_exit is
>> set to true, even if the MSR permission bitmap for a particular VMCS
>> *doesn't* allow the MSR to be written without an intercept. That's
>> functionally correct, but inefficient. It seems to me that
>> save_spec_ctrl_on_exit should indicate whether or not the *current*
>> MSR permission bitmap allows unintercepted writes to IA32_SPEC_CTRL.
>> To that end, perhaps save_spec_ctrl_on_exit rightfully belongs in the
>> loaded_vmcs structure, alongside the msr_bitmap pointer that it is
>> associated with. For vmcs02, nested_vmx_merge_msr_bitmap() should set
>> the vmcs02 save_spec_ctrl_on_exit based on (a) whether L0 is willing
>> to yield the MSR to L1, and (b) whether L1 is willing to yield the MSR
>> to L2.
>
> I actually got rid of this save_spec_ctrl_on_exit variable and replaced
> it with another variable like the one suggested for IBPB. Just to avoid
> doing an expensive guest_cpuid_has. Now I peak instead in the MSR bitmap
> to figure out if this MSR was supposed to be intercepted or not. This
> test should provide a similar semantics to save_spec_ctrl_on_exit.
>
> Anyway, cleaning up/testing now and will post a new version.
I think this patch should address all your concerns.
Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Berlin - Dresden - Aachen
main office: Krausenstr. 38, 10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Dr. Ralf Herbrich, Christian Schlaeger
Ust-ID: DE289237879
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg HRB 149173 B
[-- Attachment #2: 0004-KVM-VMX-Allow-direct-access-to-MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 9883 bytes --]
>From 9c19a8ac3f021efba6f70ad7e28f7ad06bb97e43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 19:58:10 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Allow direct access to MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL
[ Based on a patch from Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> ]
Add direct access to MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL for guests. This is needed for
guests that will only mitigate Spectre V2 through IBRS+IBPB and will not
be using a retpoline+IBPB based approach.
To avoid the overhead of atomically saving and restoring the
MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL for guests that do not actually use the MSR, only
add_atomic_switch_msr when a non-zero is written to it.
No attempt is made to handle STIBP here, intentionally. Filtering STIBP
may be added in a future patch, which may require trapping all writes
if we don't want to pass it through directly to the guest.
[dwmw2: Clean up CPUID bits, save/restore manually, handle reset]
Cc: Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
Cc: Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: KarimAllah Ahmed <karahmed@amazon.de>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
---
v6:
- got rid of save_spec_ctrl_on_exit
- introduce spec_ctrl_intercepted
- introduce spec_ctrl_used
v5:
- Also check for X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL for the msr reads/writes
v4:
- Add IBRS to kvm_cpuid_8000_0008_ebx_x86_features
- Handling nested guests
v3:
- Save/restore manually
- Fix CPUID handling
- Fix a copy & paste error in the name of SPEC_CTRL MSR in
disable_intercept.
- support !cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap()
v2:
- remove 'host_spec_ctrl' in favor of only a comment (dwmw@).
- special case writing '0' in SPEC_CTRL to avoid confusing live-migration
when the instance never used the MSR (dwmw@).
- depend on X86_FEATURE_IBRS instead of X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL (dwmw@).
- add MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL to the list of MSRs to save (dropped it by accident).
---
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 9 +++--
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
index 1909635..13f5d42 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
/* cpuid 0x80000008.ebx */
const u32 kvm_cpuid_8000_0008_ebx_x86_features =
- F(IBPB);
+ F(IBPB) | F(IBRS);
/* cpuid 0xC0000001.edx */
const u32 kvm_cpuid_C000_0001_edx_x86_features =
@@ -394,7 +394,8 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
/* cpuid 7.0.edx*/
const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_0_edx_x86_features =
- F(AVX512_4VNNIW) | F(AVX512_4FMAPS) | F(ARCH_CAPABILITIES);
+ F(AVX512_4VNNIW) | F(AVX512_4FMAPS) | F(SPEC_CTRL) |
+ F(ARCH_CAPABILITIES);
/* all calls to cpuid_count() should be made on the same cpu */
get_cpu();
@@ -630,9 +631,11 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
g_phys_as = phys_as;
entry->eax = g_phys_as | (virt_as << 8);
entry->edx = 0;
- /* IBPB isn't necessarily present in hardware cpuid */
+ /* IBRS and IBPB aren't necessarily present in hardware cpuid */
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB))
entry->ebx |= F(IBPB);
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBRS))
+ entry->ebx |= F(IBRS);
entry->ebx &= kvm_cpuid_8000_0008_ebx_x86_features;
cpuid_mask(&entry->ebx, CPUID_8000_0008_EBX);
break;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 6a9f4ec..bfc80ff 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -594,6 +594,14 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
#endif
u64 arch_capabilities;
+ u64 spec_ctrl;
+
+ /*
+ * This indicates that:
+ * 1) guest_cpuid_has(X86_FEATURE_IBRS) == true &&
+ * 2) The guest has actually initiated a write against the MSR.
+ */
+ bool spec_ctrl_used;
/*
* This indicates that:
@@ -946,6 +954,8 @@ static void vmx_set_nmi_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool masked);
static bool nested_vmx_is_page_fault_vmexit(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
u16 error_code);
static void vmx_update_msr_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
+static void __always_inline vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
+ u32 msr, int type);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vmcs *, vmxarea);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vmcs *, current_vmcs);
@@ -1917,6 +1927,22 @@ static void update_exception_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vmcs_write32(EXCEPTION_BITMAP, eb);
}
+/* Is SPEC_CTRL intercepted for the currently running vCPU? */
+static bool spec_ctrl_intercepted(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
+{
+ unsigned long *msr_bitmap;
+ int f = sizeof(unsigned long);
+
+ if (!cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap())
+ return true;
+
+ msr_bitmap = is_guest_mode(vcpu) ?
+ to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vmcs02.msr_bitmap :
+ to_vmx(vcpu)->vmcs01.msr_bitmap;
+
+ return !!test_bit(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, msr_bitmap + 0x800 / f);
+}
+
static void clear_atomic_switch_msr_special(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx,
unsigned long entry, unsigned long exit)
{
@@ -3246,6 +3272,14 @@ static int vmx_get_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
case MSR_IA32_TSC:
msr_info->data = guest_read_tsc(vcpu);
break;
+ case MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL:
+ if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
+ !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBRS) &&
+ !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL))
+ return 1;
+
+ msr_info->data = to_vmx(vcpu)->spec_ctrl;
+ break;
case MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES:
if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES))
@@ -3359,6 +3393,34 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info)
case MSR_IA32_TSC:
kvm_write_tsc(vcpu, msr_info);
break;
+ case MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL:
+ if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
+ !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBRS) &&
+ !guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_SPEC_CTRL))
+ return 1;
+
+ vmx->spec_ctrl_used = true;
+
+ /* The STIBP bit doesn't fault even if it's not advertised */
+ if (data & ~(SPEC_CTRL_IBRS | SPEC_CTRL_STIBP))
+ return 1;
+
+ vmx->spec_ctrl = data;
+
+ /*
+ * When it's written (to non-zero) for the first time, pass
+ * it through. This means we don't have to take the perf
+ * hit of saving it on vmexit for the common case of guests
+ * that don't use it.
+ */
+ if (cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap() && data &&
+ spec_ctrl_intercepted(vcpu) &&
+ is_guest_mode(vcpu))
+ vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(
+ vmx->vmcs01.msr_bitmap,
+ MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL,
+ MSR_TYPE_RW);
+ break;
case MSR_IA32_PRED_CMD:
if (!msr_info->host_initiated &&
!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_IBPB) &&
@@ -5678,6 +5740,7 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
u64 cr0;
vmx->rmode.vm86_active = 0;
+ vmx->spec_ctrl = 0;
vmx->vcpu.arch.regs[VCPU_REGS_RDX] = get_rdx_init_val();
kvm_set_cr8(vcpu, 0);
@@ -9349,6 +9412,15 @@ static void __noclone vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
vmx_arm_hv_timer(vcpu);
+ /*
+ * If this vCPU has touched SPEC_CTRL, restore the guest's value if
+ * it's non-zero. Since vmentry is serialising on affected CPUs, there
+ * is no need to worry about the conditional branch over the wrmsr
+ * being speculatively taken.
+ */
+ if (vmx->spec_ctrl)
+ wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, vmx->spec_ctrl);
+
vmx->__launched = vmx->loaded_vmcs->launched;
asm(
/* Store host registers */
@@ -9467,6 +9539,19 @@ static void __noclone vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
#endif
);
+ /*
+ * We do not use IBRS in the kernel. If this vCPU has used the
+ * SPEC_CTRL MSR it may have left it on; save the value and
+ * turn it off. This is much more efficient than blindly adding
+ * it to the atomic save/restore list. Especially as the former
+ * (Saving guest MSRs on vmexit) doesn't even exist in KVM.
+ */
+ if (!spec_ctrl_intercepted(vcpu))
+ rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, vmx->spec_ctrl);
+
+ if (vmx->spec_ctrl)
+ wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, 0);
+
/* Eliminate branch target predictions from guest mode */
vmexit_fill_RSB();
@@ -10092,7 +10177,8 @@ static inline bool nested_vmx_merge_msr_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
unsigned long *msr_bitmap_l0 = to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.vmcs02.msr_bitmap;
if (!nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode(vmcs12) &&
- !to_vmx(vcpu)->pred_cmd_used)
+ !to_vmx(vcpu)->pred_cmd_used &&
+ !to_vmx(vcpu)->spec_ctrl_used)
return false;
page = kvm_vcpu_gpa_to_page(vcpu, vmcs12->msr_bitmap);
@@ -10126,6 +10212,12 @@ static inline bool nested_vmx_merge_msr_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
}
}
+ if (to_vmx(vcpu)->spec_ctrl_used)
+ nested_vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(
+ msr_bitmap_l1, msr_bitmap_l0,
+ MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL,
+ MSR_TYPE_R | MSR_TYPE_W);
+
if (to_vmx(vcpu)->pred_cmd_used)
nested_vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(
msr_bitmap_l1, msr_bitmap_l0,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 4ec142e..ac38143 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1009,7 +1009,7 @@ static u32 msrs_to_save[] = {
#endif
MSR_IA32_TSC, MSR_IA32_CR_PAT, MSR_VM_HSAVE_PA,
MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL, MSR_IA32_BNDCFGS, MSR_TSC_AUX,
- MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES
+ MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL, MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES
};
static unsigned num_msrs_to_save;
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-01 0:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-31 19:37 [PATCH v5 0/5] KVM: Expose speculation control feature to guests KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-31 19:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] KVM: x86: Update the reverse_cpuid list to include CPUID_7_EDX KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-31 20:22 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-31 19:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] KVM: x86: Add IBPB support KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-31 19:45 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-31 19:53 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-31 19:55 ` Jim Mattson
2018-02-01 0:27 ` KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-31 20:28 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-31 20:36 ` KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-01 4:54 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-02-01 17:00 ` Raj, Ashok
2018-01-31 19:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] KVM: VMX: Emulate MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-31 19:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] KVM: VMX: Allow direct access to MSR_IA32_SPEC_CTRL KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-31 19:53 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-31 20:00 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-31 20:01 ` KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-31 20:18 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-31 20:21 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-31 21:18 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-31 22:05 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-31 20:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-31 20:54 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-31 21:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-31 21:05 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-31 21:17 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-31 21:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-31 21:53 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-31 21:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-31 21:59 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-31 22:06 ` Jim Mattson
2018-01-31 22:10 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-31 22:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-31 22:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-02-01 14:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-01-31 22:52 ` KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-01 0:24 ` KarimAllah Ahmed [this message]
2018-02-01 4:26 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-01 13:25 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-01 17:37 ` KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-01 17:46 ` KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-02-01 14:19 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-02-01 14:28 ` KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-31 22:56 ` Raj, Ashok
2018-01-31 19:37 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] KVM: SVM: " KarimAllah Ahmed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e28c13c4-4a04-8a41-2a5c-16509e1bad0e@amazon.com \
--to=karahmed@amazon.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®