Re: [PATCH v8 6/8] drm/msm/dpu: separate DSC flush update out of interface

[Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>]

On 12/05/2023 21:47, Abhinav Kumar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5/12/2023 11:21 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 12/05/2023 21:00, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
>>> Current DSC flush update is piggyback inside dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg_v1().
>>> This patch separates DSC flush away from dpu_hw_ctl_intf_cfg_v1() by
>>> adding dpu_hw_ctl_update_pending_flush_dsc_v1() to handle both per
>>> DSC engine and DSC flush bits at same time to make it consistent with
>>> the location of flush programming of other dpu sub blocks.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.c  | 22 
>>> ++++++++++++++++------
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_hw_ctl.h  | 10 ++++++++++
>>>   3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c 
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>> index ffa6f04..5cae70e 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/disp/dpu1/dpu_encoder.c
>>> @@ -1834,12 +1834,18 @@ dpu_encoder_dsc_initial_line_calc(struct 
>>> drm_dsc_config *dsc,
>>>       return DIV_ROUND_UP(total_pixels, dsc->slice_width);
>>>   }
>>> -static void dpu_encoder_dsc_pipe_cfg(struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
>>> +static void dpu_encoder_dsc_pipe_cfg(struct dpu_encoder_virt *dpu_enc,
>>> +                     struct dpu_hw_dsc *hw_dsc,
>>>                        struct dpu_hw_pingpong *hw_pp,
>>>                        struct drm_dsc_config *dsc,
>>>                        u32 common_mode,
>>>                        u32 initial_lines)
>>>   {
>>> +    struct dpu_encoder_phys *cur_master = dpu_enc->cur_master;
>>> +    struct dpu_hw_ctl *ctl;
>>> +
>>> +    ctl = cur_master->hw_ctl;
>>
>> Just for my understanding: if we have a bonded DSI @ sdm845, should 
>> both flashes go to the master CTL or each flush should go to the 
>> corresponding CTL?
>>
> 
> Is this question for DSC or just general question about flush?
> 
> I dont see an explicit DSC flush needed in sdm845 at the ctl level.
> 
> If the question is about general flush involving two control paths, we 
> need to combine the flushes and they goto the master only. Please refer 
> to below part in sde_encoder.c
And this is because we have a single CTL to flush on sm8150+, isn't it?

> 
> 4243     /* for split flush, combine pending flush masks and send to 
> master */
> 4244     if (pending_flush.pending_flush_mask && sde_enc->cur_master) {
> 4245         ctl = sde_enc->cur_master->hw_ctl;
> 4246         if (config_changed && ctl->ops.reg_dma_flush)
> 4247             ctl->ops.reg_dma_flush(ctl, is_regdma_blocking);
> 4248         _sde_encoder_trigger_flush(&sde_enc->base, 
> sde_enc->cur_master,
> 4249                         &pending_flush,
> 4250                         config_changed);
> 4251     }


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry