From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: wangtao <tao.wangtao@honor.com>,
"sumit.semwal@linaro.org" <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>,
"benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com"
<benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com>,
"Brian.Starkey@arm.com" <Brian.Starkey@arm.com>,
"jstultz@google.com" <jstultz@google.com>,
"tjmercier@google.com" <tjmercier@google.com>
Cc: "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"wangbintian(BintianWang)" <bintian.wang@honor.com>,
yipengxiang <yipengxiang@honor.com>,
liulu 00013167 <liulu.liu@honor.com>,
hanfeng 00012985 <feng.han@honor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmabuf/heaps: implement DMA_BUF_IOCTL_RW_FILE for system_heap
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 15:17:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef978301-6a63-451d-9ae6-171968b26a55@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b68b2a50d48444b93d97f5d342f37c8@honor.com>
On 5/13/25 14:30, wangtao wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2025 7:32 PM
>> To: wangtao <tao.wangtao@honor.com>; sumit.semwal@linaro.org;
>> benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com; Brian.Starkey@arm.com;
>> jstultz@google.com; tjmercier@google.com
>> Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; linaro-
>> mm-sig@lists.linaro.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> wangbintian(BintianWang) <bintian.wang@honor.com>; yipengxiang
>> <yipengxiang@honor.com>; liulu 00013167 <liulu.liu@honor.com>; hanfeng
>> 00012985 <feng.han@honor.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmabuf/heaps: implement
>> DMA_BUF_IOCTL_RW_FILE for system_heap
>>
>> On 5/13/25 11:28, wangtao wrote:
>>> Support direct file I/O operations for system_heap dma-buf objects.
>>> Implementation includes:
>>> 1. Convert sg_table to bio_vec
>>
>> That is usually illegal for DMA-bufs.
> [wangtao] The term 'convert' is misleading in this context. The appropriate phrasing should be: Construct bio_vec from sg_table.
Well it doesn't matter what you call it. Touching the page inside an sg table of a DMA-buf is illegal, we even have code to actively prevent that.
Once more: This approach was already rejected multiple times! Please use udmabuf instead!
The hack you came up here is simply not necessary.
Regards,
Christian.
> Appreciate your feedback.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> 2. Set IOCB_DIRECT when O_DIRECT is supported 3. Invoke
>>> vfs_iocb_iter_read()/vfs_iocb_iter_write() for actual I/O
>>>
>>> Performance metrics (UFS 4.0 device @4GB/s, Arm64 CPU @1GHz):
>>>
>>> | Metric | 1MB | 8MB | 64MB | 1024MB | 3072MB |
>>> |--------------------|-------:|-------:|--------:|---------:|---------
>>> |--------------------|:|
>>> | Buffer Read (us) | 1658 | 9028 | 69295 | 1019783 | 2978179 |
>>> | Direct Read (us) | 707 | 2647 | 18689 | 299627 | 937758 |
>>> | Buffer Rate (MB/s) | 603 | 886 | 924 | 1004 | 1032 |
>>> | Direct Rate (MB/s) | 1414 | 3022 | 3425 | 3418 | 3276 |
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: wangtao <tao.wangtao@honor.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 118
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
>>> b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
>>> index 26d5dc89ea16..f7b71b9843aa 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
>>> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>>> #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
>>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>>> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>>> +#include <linux/bvec.h>
>>> +#include <linux/uio.h>
>>>
>>> static struct dma_heap *sys_heap;
>>>
>>> @@ -281,6 +283,121 @@ static void system_heap_vunmap(struct dma_buf
>> *dmabuf, struct iosys_map *map)
>>> iosys_map_clear(map);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static struct bio_vec *system_heap_init_bvec(struct
>> system_heap_buffer *buffer,
>>> + size_t offset, size_t len, int *nr_segs) {
>>> + struct sg_table *sgt = &buffer->sg_table;
>>> + struct scatterlist *sg;
>>> + size_t length = 0;
>>> + unsigned int i, k = 0;
>>> + struct bio_vec *bvec;
>>> + size_t sg_left;
>>> + size_t sg_offset;
>>> + size_t sg_len;
>>> +
>>> + bvec = kvcalloc(sgt->nents, sizeof(*bvec), GFP_KERNEL);
>>> + if (!bvec)
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>> + for_each_sg(sgt->sgl, sg, sgt->nents, i) {
>>> + length += sg->length;
>>> + if (length <= offset)
>>> + continue;
>>> +
>>> + sg_left = length - offset;
>>> + sg_offset = sg->offset + sg->length - sg_left;
>>> + sg_len = min(sg_left, len);
>>> +
>>> + bvec[k].bv_page = sg_page(sg);
>>> + bvec[k].bv_len = sg_len;
>>> + bvec[k].bv_offset = sg_offset;
>>> + k++;
>>> +
>>> + offset += sg_len;
>>> + len -= sg_len;
>>> + if (len <= 0)
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + *nr_segs = k;
>>> + return bvec;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int system_heap_rw_file(struct system_heap_buffer *buffer, bool
>> is_read,
>>> + bool direct_io, struct file *filp, loff_t file_offset,
>>> + size_t buf_offset, size_t len)
>>> +{
>>> + struct bio_vec *bvec;
>>> + int nr_segs = 0;
>>> + struct iov_iter iter;
>>> + struct kiocb kiocb;
>>> + ssize_t ret = 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (direct_io) {
>>> + if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + bvec = system_heap_init_bvec(buffer, buf_offset, len, &nr_segs);
>>> + if (!bvec)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + iov_iter_bvec(&iter, is_read ? ITER_DEST : ITER_SOURCE, bvec,
>> nr_segs, len);
>>> + init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, filp);
>>> + kiocb.ki_pos = file_offset;
>>> + if (direct_io)
>>> + kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DIRECT;
>>> +
>>> + while (kiocb.ki_pos < file_offset + len) {
>>> + if (is_read)
>>> + ret = vfs_iocb_iter_read(filp, &kiocb, &iter);
>>> + else
>>> + ret = vfs_iocb_iter_write(filp, &kiocb, &iter);
>>> + if (ret <= 0)
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + kvfree(bvec);
>>> + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int system_heap_dma_buf_rw_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
>>> + struct dma_buf_rw_file *back)
>>> +{
>>> + struct system_heap_buffer *buffer = dmabuf->priv;
>>> + int ret = 0;
>>> + __u32 op = back->flags & DMA_BUF_RW_FLAGS_OP_MASK;
>>> + bool direct_io = back->flags & DMA_BUF_RW_FLAGS_DIRECT;
>>> + struct file *filp;
>>> +
>>> + if (op != DMA_BUF_RW_FLAGS_READ && op !=
>> DMA_BUF_RW_FLAGS_WRITE)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + if (direct_io) {
>>> + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(back->file_offset) ||
>>> + !PAGE_ALIGNED(back->buf_offset) ||
>>> + !PAGE_ALIGNED(back->buf_len))
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> + if (!back->buf_len || back->buf_len > dmabuf->size ||
>>> + back->buf_offset >= dmabuf->size ||
>>> + back->buf_offset + back->buf_len > dmabuf->size)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + if (back->file_offset + back->buf_len < back->file_offset)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + filp = fget(back->fd);
>>> + if (!filp)
>>> + return -EBADF;
>>> +
>>> + mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
>>> + ret = system_heap_rw_file(buffer, op ==
>> DMA_BUF_RW_FLAGS_READ, direct_io,
>>> + filp, back->file_offset, back->buf_offset, back-
>>> buf_len);
>>> + mutex_unlock(&buffer->lock);
>>> +
>>> + fput(filp);
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void system_heap_dma_buf_release(struct dma_buf *dmabuf) {
>>> struct system_heap_buffer *buffer = dmabuf->priv; @@ -308,6
>> +425,7
>>> @@ static const struct dma_buf_ops system_heap_buf_ops = {
>>> .mmap = system_heap_mmap,
>>> .vmap = system_heap_vmap,
>>> .vunmap = system_heap_vunmap,
>>> + .rw_file = system_heap_dma_buf_rw_file,
>>> .release = system_heap_dma_buf_release, };
>>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-13 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-13 9:28 wangtao
2025-05-13 11:32 ` Christian König
2025-05-13 12:30 ` wangtao
2025-05-13 13:17 ` Christian König [this message]
2025-05-14 11:02 ` wangtao
2025-05-14 12:00 ` Christian König
2025-05-15 14:03 ` wangtao
2025-05-15 14:26 ` Christian König
2025-05-16 7:40 ` wangtao
2025-05-16 8:36 ` Christian König
2025-05-16 9:49 ` wangtao
2025-05-16 10:29 ` Christian König
2025-05-19 4:08 ` wangtao
2025-05-19 7:47 ` Christian König
2025-05-16 18:37 ` T.J. Mercier
2025-05-19 4:37 ` wangtao
2025-05-19 12:03 ` wangtao
2025-05-20 4:06 ` wangtao
2025-05-21 2:00 ` T.J. Mercier
2025-05-21 4:17 ` wangtao
2025-05-21 7:35 ` Christian König
2025-05-21 10:25 ` wangtao
2025-05-21 11:56 ` Christian König
2025-05-22 8:02 ` wangtao
2025-05-22 11:57 ` Christian König
2025-05-22 12:29 ` wangtao
2025-05-27 14:35 ` wangtao
2025-05-27 15:10 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef978301-6a63-451d-9ae6-171968b26a55@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=bintian.wang@honor.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=feng.han@honor.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liulu.liu@honor.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tao.wangtao@honor.com \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=yipengxiang@honor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®