From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: wangtao <tao.wangtao@honor.com>,
sumit.semwal@linaro.org, benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com,
Brian.Starkey@arm.com, jstultz@google.com, tjmercier@google.com
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bintian.wang@honor.com, yipengxiang@honor.com,
liulu.liu@honor.com, feng.han@honor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dmabuf/heaps: implement DMA_BUF_IOCTL_RW_FILE for system_heap
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 13:32:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fdc8f0a2-5b2f-4898-8090-0d7b888c15d8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250513092803.2096-1-tao.wangtao@honor.com>
On 5/13/25 11:28, wangtao wrote:
> Support direct file I/O operations for system_heap dma-buf objects.
> Implementation includes:
> 1. Convert sg_table to bio_vec
That is usually illegal for DMA-bufs.
Regards,
Christian.
> 2. Set IOCB_DIRECT when O_DIRECT is supported
> 3. Invoke vfs_iocb_iter_read()/vfs_iocb_iter_write() for actual I/O
>
> Performance metrics (UFS 4.0 device @4GB/s, Arm64 CPU @1GHz):
>
> | Metric | 1MB | 8MB | 64MB | 1024MB | 3072MB |
> |--------------------|-------:|-------:|--------:|---------:|---------:|
> | Buffer Read (us) | 1658 | 9028 | 69295 | 1019783 | 2978179 |
> | Direct Read (us) | 707 | 2647 | 18689 | 299627 | 937758 |
> | Buffer Rate (MB/s) | 603 | 886 | 924 | 1004 | 1032 |
> | Direct Rate (MB/s) | 1414 | 3022 | 3425 | 3418 | 3276 |
>
> Signed-off-by: wangtao <tao.wangtao@honor.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 118 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> index 26d5dc89ea16..f7b71b9843aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/heaps/system_heap.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
> #include <linux/scatterlist.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> +#include <linux/bvec.h>
> +#include <linux/uio.h>
>
> static struct dma_heap *sys_heap;
>
> @@ -281,6 +283,121 @@ static void system_heap_vunmap(struct dma_buf *dmabuf, struct iosys_map *map)
> iosys_map_clear(map);
> }
>
> +static struct bio_vec *system_heap_init_bvec(struct system_heap_buffer *buffer,
> + size_t offset, size_t len, int *nr_segs)
> +{
> + struct sg_table *sgt = &buffer->sg_table;
> + struct scatterlist *sg;
> + size_t length = 0;
> + unsigned int i, k = 0;
> + struct bio_vec *bvec;
> + size_t sg_left;
> + size_t sg_offset;
> + size_t sg_len;
> +
> + bvec = kvcalloc(sgt->nents, sizeof(*bvec), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!bvec)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + for_each_sg(sgt->sgl, sg, sgt->nents, i) {
> + length += sg->length;
> + if (length <= offset)
> + continue;
> +
> + sg_left = length - offset;
> + sg_offset = sg->offset + sg->length - sg_left;
> + sg_len = min(sg_left, len);
> +
> + bvec[k].bv_page = sg_page(sg);
> + bvec[k].bv_len = sg_len;
> + bvec[k].bv_offset = sg_offset;
> + k++;
> +
> + offset += sg_len;
> + len -= sg_len;
> + if (len <= 0)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + *nr_segs = k;
> + return bvec;
> +}
> +
> +static int system_heap_rw_file(struct system_heap_buffer *buffer, bool is_read,
> + bool direct_io, struct file *filp, loff_t file_offset,
> + size_t buf_offset, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct bio_vec *bvec;
> + int nr_segs = 0;
> + struct iov_iter iter;
> + struct kiocb kiocb;
> + ssize_t ret = 0;
> +
> + if (direct_io) {
> + if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + bvec = system_heap_init_bvec(buffer, buf_offset, len, &nr_segs);
> + if (!bvec)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + iov_iter_bvec(&iter, is_read ? ITER_DEST : ITER_SOURCE, bvec, nr_segs, len);
> + init_sync_kiocb(&kiocb, filp);
> + kiocb.ki_pos = file_offset;
> + if (direct_io)
> + kiocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_DIRECT;
> +
> + while (kiocb.ki_pos < file_offset + len) {
> + if (is_read)
> + ret = vfs_iocb_iter_read(filp, &kiocb, &iter);
> + else
> + ret = vfs_iocb_iter_write(filp, &kiocb, &iter);
> + if (ret <= 0)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + kvfree(bvec);
> + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int system_heap_dma_buf_rw_file(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> + struct dma_buf_rw_file *back)
> +{
> + struct system_heap_buffer *buffer = dmabuf->priv;
> + int ret = 0;
> + __u32 op = back->flags & DMA_BUF_RW_FLAGS_OP_MASK;
> + bool direct_io = back->flags & DMA_BUF_RW_FLAGS_DIRECT;
> + struct file *filp;
> +
> + if (op != DMA_BUF_RW_FLAGS_READ && op != DMA_BUF_RW_FLAGS_WRITE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (direct_io) {
> + if (!PAGE_ALIGNED(back->file_offset) ||
> + !PAGE_ALIGNED(back->buf_offset) ||
> + !PAGE_ALIGNED(back->buf_len))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (!back->buf_len || back->buf_len > dmabuf->size ||
> + back->buf_offset >= dmabuf->size ||
> + back->buf_offset + back->buf_len > dmabuf->size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (back->file_offset + back->buf_len < back->file_offset)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + filp = fget(back->fd);
> + if (!filp)
> + return -EBADF;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&buffer->lock);
> + ret = system_heap_rw_file(buffer, op == DMA_BUF_RW_FLAGS_READ, direct_io,
> + filp, back->file_offset, back->buf_offset, back->buf_len);
> + mutex_unlock(&buffer->lock);
> +
> + fput(filp);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static void system_heap_dma_buf_release(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> {
> struct system_heap_buffer *buffer = dmabuf->priv;
> @@ -308,6 +425,7 @@ static const struct dma_buf_ops system_heap_buf_ops = {
> .mmap = system_heap_mmap,
> .vmap = system_heap_vmap,
> .vunmap = system_heap_vunmap,
> + .rw_file = system_heap_dma_buf_rw_file,
> .release = system_heap_dma_buf_release,
> };
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-13 11:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-13 9:28 wangtao
2025-05-13 11:32 ` Christian König [this message]
2025-05-13 12:30 ` wangtao
2025-05-13 13:17 ` Christian König
2025-05-14 11:02 ` wangtao
2025-05-14 12:00 ` Christian König
2025-05-15 14:03 ` wangtao
2025-05-15 14:26 ` Christian König
2025-05-16 7:40 ` wangtao
2025-05-16 8:36 ` Christian König
2025-05-16 9:49 ` wangtao
2025-05-16 10:29 ` Christian König
2025-05-19 4:08 ` wangtao
2025-05-19 7:47 ` Christian König
2025-05-16 18:37 ` T.J. Mercier
2025-05-19 4:37 ` wangtao
2025-05-19 12:03 ` wangtao
2025-05-20 4:06 ` wangtao
2025-05-21 2:00 ` T.J. Mercier
2025-05-21 4:17 ` wangtao
2025-05-21 7:35 ` Christian König
2025-05-21 10:25 ` wangtao
2025-05-21 11:56 ` Christian König
2025-05-22 8:02 ` wangtao
2025-05-22 11:57 ` Christian König
2025-05-22 12:29 ` wangtao
2025-05-27 14:35 ` wangtao
2025-05-27 15:10 ` Christian König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fdc8f0a2-5b2f-4898-8090-0d7b888c15d8@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=Brian.Starkey@arm.com \
--cc=benjamin.gaignard@collabora.com \
--cc=bintian.wang@honor.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=feng.han@honor.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liulu.liu@honor.com \
--cc=sumit.semwal@linaro.org \
--cc=tao.wangtao@honor.com \
--cc=tjmercier@google.com \
--cc=yipengxiang@honor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®