mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] Use EXPORT_SYMBOL for pv_lock_ops
@ 2008-08-20 19:25 drago01
  2008-08-20 19:29 ` drago01
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: drago01 @ 2008-08-20 19:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: kernel list

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It seems that in 2.6.27 pv_lock_ops is now GPL only which breaks
>> binary drivers because they pick it up implicitly when CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>> is enabled.
>> (see http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1750090&postcount=2)
>> Is there a reason for doing this?
>> As some other pv_* are exported to all modules can this be done for
>> this too? (there should be no difference between CONFIG_PARAVIRT on or
>> of for GPL'd symbols).
>
> Yeah, they're just GPL by default, but the lock code is not exported GPL
> so there's no reason why lock_ops should be.
>
>    J
>
>

Use EXPORT_SYMBOL for pv_lock_ops to preserve the behavior between
CONFIG_PARAVIRT set and unset.
Currently we only used _GPL when the non paravirt symbols are GPL only too.

Signed-off-by: Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah@gmail.com>

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
index 94da4d5..300da17 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ struct pv_lock_ops pv_lock_ops = {
        .spin_unlock = __ticket_spin_unlock,
 #endif
 };
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_lock_ops);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pv_lock_ops);

 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_time_ops);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL    (pv_cpu_ops);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] Use EXPORT_SYMBOL for pv_lock_ops
  2008-08-20 19:25 [PATCH] Use EXPORT_SYMBOL for pv_lock_ops drago01
@ 2008-08-20 19:29 ` drago01
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: drago01 @ 2008-08-20 19:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: kernel list

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:25 PM, drago01 <drago01@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>> drago01 wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It seems that in 2.6.27 pv_lock_ops is now GPL only which breaks
>>> binary drivers because they pick it up implicitly when CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>>> is enabled.
>>> (see http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1750090&postcount=2)
>>> Is there a reason for doing this?
>>> As some other pv_* are exported to all modules can this be done for
>>> this too? (there should be no difference between CONFIG_PARAVIRT on or
>>> of for GPL'd symbols).
>>
>> Yeah, they're just GPL by default, but the lock code is not exported GPL
>> so there's no reason why lock_ops should be.
>>
>>    J
>>
>>
>
> Use EXPORT_SYMBOL for pv_lock_ops to preserve the behavior between
> CONFIG_PARAVIRT set and unset.
> Currently we only used _GPL when the non paravirt symbols are GPL only too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adel Gadllah <adel.gadllah@gmail.com>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
> index 94da4d5..300da17 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt.c
> @@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ struct pv_lock_ops pv_lock_ops = {
>        .spin_unlock = __ticket_spin_unlock,
>  #endif
>  };
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_lock_ops);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pv_lock_ops);
>
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_time_ops);
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL    (pv_cpu_ops);
>

Seems like Jeremy already sent a patch, ignore this one.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-20 19:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-20 19:25 [PATCH] Use EXPORT_SYMBOL for pv_lock_ops drago01
2008-08-20 19:29 ` drago01

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®