From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@arm.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Tim C . Chen" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] sched/fair: Do not even the number of busy CPUs via asym_packing
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 13:44:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8a75f47-0f7e-14cc-adf4-2854e235b26e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230207045838.11243-8-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
On 07/02/2023 05:58, Ricardo Neri wrote:
[...]
> @@ -9269,33 +9264,11 @@ static bool asym_smt_can_pull_tasks(int dst_cpu, struct sd_lb_stats *sds,
> struct sched_group *sg)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
> - bool local_is_smt;
> int sg_busy_cpus;
>
> - local_is_smt = sds->local->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY;
> sg_busy_cpus = sgs->group_weight - sgs->idle_cpus;
>
> - if (!local_is_smt) {
> - /*
> - * If we are here, @dst_cpu is idle and does not have SMT
> - * siblings. Pull tasks if candidate group has two or more
> - * busy CPUs.
> - */
> - if (sg_busy_cpus >= 2) /* implies sg_is_smt */
> - return true;
> -
> - /*
> - * @dst_cpu does not have SMT siblings. @sg may have SMT
> - * siblings and only one is busy. In such case, @dst_cpu
> - * can help if it has higher priority and is idle (i.e.,
> - * it has no running tasks).
> - */
> - return sched_asym_prefer(dst_cpu, sg->asym_prefer_cpu);
> - }
> -
> /*
> - * @dst_cpu has SMT siblings and are also idle.
> - *
> * If the difference in the number of busy CPUs is two or more, let
> * find_busiest_group() take care of it. We only care if @sg has
> * exactly one busy CPU. This covers SMT and non-SMT sched groups.
Can't this be made lighter by removing asym_smt_can_pull_tasks() and
putting the logic to exclude the call to sched_asym_prefer() into
sched_asym() directly?
Not sure if we need the CONFIG_SCHED_SMT since it's all guarded by
`flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY` already, which is only set under.
CONFIG_SCHED_SMT.
static inline bool
sched_asym(struct lb_env *env, struct sd_lb_stats *sds,
struct sg_lb_stats *sgs, struct sched_group *group)
{
bool local_is_smt = sds->local->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY;
if (local_is_smt && !is_core_idle(env->dst_cpu))
return false;
if ((local_is_smt || group->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY)) {
int sg_busy_cpus = sgs->group_weight - sgs->idle_cpus;
if (sg_busy_cpus != 1)
return false;
}
return sched_asym_prefer(env->dst_cpu, group->asym_prefer_cpu);
}
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-13 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-07 4:58 [PATCH v3 00/10] sched/fair: Avoid unnecessary migrations within SMT domains Ricardo Neri
2023-02-07 4:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] sched/fair: Generalize asym_packing logic for SMT cores Ricardo Neri
2023-02-07 4:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] sched/fair: Move is_core_idle() out of CONFIG_NUMA Ricardo Neri
2023-02-07 4:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] sched/fair: Only do asym_packing load balancing from fully idle SMT cores Ricardo Neri
2023-02-07 4:58 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] sched/fair: Let low-priority cores help high-priority busy " Ricardo Neri
2023-02-08 7:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-02-09 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-10 0:43 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-10 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-10 13:05 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-10 1:52 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-13 13:40 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-02-13 23:23 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-03-10 0:51 ` Tim Chen
2023-03-14 23:54 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-07 4:58 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] sched/fair: Keep a fully_busy SMT sched group as busiest Ricardo Neri
2023-02-07 4:58 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] sched/fair: Use the prefer_sibling flag of the current sched domain Ricardo Neri
2023-02-08 7:48 ` Vincent Guittot
2023-02-10 13:24 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-09 13:17 ` Chen Yu
2023-02-09 20:00 ` Chen, Tim C
2023-02-09 23:05 ` Tim Chen
2023-02-10 3:16 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-10 6:55 ` Chen Yu
2023-02-10 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-10 14:54 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-02-10 16:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-10 17:12 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-02-10 18:31 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-13 12:17 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-02-14 6:43 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-16 5:21 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-16 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-02-17 1:41 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-23 10:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2023-02-24 12:29 ` Ricardo Neri
[not found] ` <tencent_60A804570F09C0CFE0495D5B984941123A05@qq.com>
2023-02-20 9:45 ` Valentin Schneider
[not found] ` <tencent_6C38D389245FD03C6E1312999FEDD394F606@qq.com>
2023-02-21 18:15 ` Valentin Schneider
2023-02-07 4:58 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] sched/fair: Do not even the number of busy CPUs via asym_packing Ricardo Neri
2023-02-13 12:44 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2023-02-13 19:47 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-07 4:58 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] sched/topology: Remove SHARED_CHILD from ASYM_PACKING Ricardo Neri
2023-03-03 11:29 ` Ionela Voinescu
2023-03-05 19:08 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-03-06 13:10 ` Ionela Voinescu
2023-03-06 18:17 ` Ricardo Neri
2023-02-07 4:58 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] x86/sched: Remove SD_ASYM_PACKING from the SMT domain flags Ricardo Neri
2023-02-07 4:58 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] x86/sched/itmt: Give all SMT siblings of a core the same priority Ricardo Neri
2023-02-09 8:07 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] sched/fair: Avoid unnecessary migrations within SMT domains Zhang, Rui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f8a75f47-0f7e-14cc-adf4-2854e235b26e@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=ionela.voinescu@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ricardo.neri@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®