From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/9] kvm_main.c: split logic in kvm_set_memslots
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 19:04:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd8fab58-2871-c2d4-f620-e454c7ac653e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909104506.738478-5-eesposit@redhat.com>
On 9/9/22 12:45, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> +/*
> + * Takes kvm->slots_arch_lock, and releases it only if
> + * invalid_slot allocation or kvm_prepare_memory_region failed.
> +*/
Much simpler: "kvm->slots_arch_lock is taken on a successful return."
This is a small change in phrasing, but it makes a lot more sense: on
success you are preparing for the final commit operation, otherwise you
just want the caller to return your errno value.
[...]
> +/* Must be called with kvm->slots_arch_lock held, but releases it. */
s/but/and/. Even better, "and releases it before returning". "But"
tells the reader that something strange is going on, "and" tells it that
something simple is going on.
I would also rename the functions along the lines of my review to patch
3, to highlight that these function prepare/commit a *change* to a memslot.
> +static void kvm_finish_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
> + struct kvm_internal_memory_region_list *batch)
> +{
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *invalid_slot = batch->invalid;
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *old = batch->old;
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *new = batch->new;
> + enum kvm_mr_change change = batch->change;
lockdep_assert_held(&kvm->slots_arch_lock);
>
> /*
> * For DELETE and MOVE, the working slot is now active as the INVALID
> @@ -1883,6 +1898,18 @@ static int kvm_set_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
> * responsible for knowing that new->arch may be stale.
> */
> kvm_commit_memory_region(kvm, batch);
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_set_memslot(struct kvm *kvm,
> + struct kvm_internal_memory_region_list *batch)
> +{
> + int r;
> +
> + r = kvm_prepare_memslot(kvm, batch);
> + if (r)
> + return r;
> +
> + kvm_finish_memslot(kvm, batch);
>
> return 0;
Ok, these are the functions I hinted at in the review of the previous
patch, so we're not far away. You should be able to move the
kvm_set_memslot call to kvm_set_memory_region in patch 3, and then
replace it with the two calls here directly in kvm_set_memory_region.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 10:44 [RFC PATCH 0/9] kvm: implement atomic memslot updates Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-09 10:44 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] kvm_main.c: move slot check in kvm_set_memory_region Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-28 16:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-09 10:44 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] kvm.h: introduce KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION_LIST ioctl Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-28 16:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-09 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] kvm_main.c: introduce kvm_internal_memory_region_list Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-28 16:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-09 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] kvm_main.c: split logic in kvm_set_memslots Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-28 17:04 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-09-09 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] kvm_main.c: split __kvm_set_memory_region logic in kvm_check_mem and kvm_prepare_batch Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-13 2:56 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-09-18 16:22 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-28 17:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-09 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] kvm_main.c: simplify change-specific callbacks Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-09 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] kvm_main.c: duplicate invalid memslot also in inactive list Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-28 17:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-09 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] kvm_main.c: find memslots from the inactive memslot list Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-09 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] kvm_main.c: handle atomic memslot update Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-13 2:30 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-09-18 16:18 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-27 7:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-27 8:35 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-27 9:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-27 9:32 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-27 14:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-28 17:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-09 14:30 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] kvm: implement atomic memslot updates Sean Christopherson
2022-09-18 16:13 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-19 7:38 ` Like Xu
2022-09-19 7:53 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-19 17:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-23 13:10 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-23 13:21 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-23 13:38 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-26 9:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-26 21:28 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-27 7:38 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-27 15:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-28 9:11 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-28 11:14 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-09-28 12:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-28 15:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-28 15:33 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-28 15:58 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-28 16:38 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-28 20:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-29 8:05 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-09-29 8:24 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-29 15:18 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-09-29 15:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-29 15:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-09-29 15:40 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-09-29 16:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-09-29 21:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-10-13 7:43 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-13 8:44 ` David Hildenbrand
2022-10-13 11:12 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2022-10-13 14:45 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd8fab58-2871-c2d4-f620-e454c7ac653e@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®