* BUG? boot failed with "crashkernel=256M@32M", but "crashkernel=256M@64M" can work
@ 2010-04-08 3:58 Ryan Wang
2010-04-08 4:14 ` Amerigo Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Wang @ 2010-04-08 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi all,
I have setup kdump on my box, but failed on booting with
"crashkernel=256M@32M".
Then I tried
"crashkernel=256M@64M"
and succeeded.
Is it a bug of kernel?
thanks,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG? boot failed with "crashkernel=256M@32M", but "crashkernel=256M@64M" can work
2010-04-08 3:58 BUG? boot failed with "crashkernel=256M@32M", but "crashkernel=256M@64M" can work Ryan Wang
@ 2010-04-08 4:14 ` Amerigo Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Amerigo Wang @ 2010-04-08 4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ryan Wang; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:58:17AM +0800, Ryan Wang wrote:
>Hi all,
>
> I have setup kdump on my box, but failed on booting with
> "crashkernel=256M@32M".
>Then I tried
> "crashkernel=256M@64M"
>and succeeded.
>
> Is it a bug of kernel?
It could be.
What failure did you meet? And your boot log?
Also, which version are you using?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-08 4:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-08 3:58 BUG? boot failed with "crashkernel=256M@32M", but "crashkernel=256M@64M" can work Ryan Wang
2010-04-08 4:14 ` Amerigo Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®