BUG? boot failed with "crashkernel=256M@32M", but "crashkernel=256M@64M" can work

mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* BUG? boot failed with "crashkernel=256M@32M", but  "crashkernel=256M@64M" can work
@ 2010-04-08  3:58 Ryan Wang
  2010-04-08  4:14 ` Amerigo Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Wang @ 2010-04-08  3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hi all,

        I have setup kdump on my box, but failed on booting with
                       "crashkernel=256M@32M".
Then I tried
                       "crashkernel=256M@64M"
and succeeded.

       Is it a bug of kernel?

thanks,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: BUG? boot failed with "crashkernel=256M@32M", but "crashkernel=256M@64M" can work
  2010-04-08  3:58 BUG? boot failed with "crashkernel=256M@32M", but "crashkernel=256M@64M" can work Ryan Wang
@ 2010-04-08  4:14 ` Amerigo Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Amerigo Wang @ 2010-04-08  4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ryan Wang; +Cc: linux-kernel

On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 11:58:17AM +0800, Ryan Wang wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>        I have setup kdump on my box, but failed on booting with
>                       "crashkernel=256M@32M".
>Then I tried
>                       "crashkernel=256M@64M"
>and succeeded.
>
>       Is it a bug of kernel?

It could be.

What failure did you meet? And your boot log?

Also, which version are you using?

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-08  4:10 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-04-08  3:58 BUG? boot failed with "crashkernel=256M@32M", but "crashkernel=256M@64M" can work Ryan Wang
2010-04-08  4:14 ` Amerigo Wang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®