From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: kmannth@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
tglx@linutronix.de, Natalie.Protasevich@UNISYS.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.17-mm6
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 01:18:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m17j2r2od0.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060705233123.dcb0a10b.akpm@osdl.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Wed, 5 Jul 2006 23:31:23 -0700")
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 22:59:05 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 23:42:00 -0600
>> ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) wrote:
>>
>> > So I suspect that we need to de-percpuify kernel_stat.irqs.
>>
>> I think so.
>
> Maybe not. If we do this, we lose the pretty CPUn columns in
> /proc/interrupts. That /proc/interrupts display requires that we maintain
> NR_CPUS*NR_IRQS counters.
Yes. Although at least part of that display is per architecture
so we may be able to get away with a little more.
> Given that a large NR_IRQs space will be sparsely populated, we should
> dynamically allocate the NR_CPUS storage for each active IRQ, as you say.
To some extent. Although with MSI-X there is the potential we could use
all of them. (But probably not).
Natalie has a firmer grasp on what is common that I do.
But I think the big Unisys boxes were running 1-2 active irqs per
cpu, and I believe some large IBM boxes were worse.
What is scary is that at 1K cpus if we wind up using all of the irqs
we start consuming 1Gig of RAM. At only 128 cpus we are still in the 2M-15M
territory, so that isn't too scary. The point is that after a certain
put the memory usage for all of those counters goes insane.
So I'm not certain how safe it is to leave something that explodes that badly
in there.
We at least need a big fat scary comment and probably something like
#if (NR_IRQS*NR_CPUS) > 1000000
#error ouch! NR_IRQS*NR_CPUS too large.
#endif
> That involves putting it into the irq_desc (as good a place as any). And a
> rather large number of trivial edits. I guess we do this only for genirq?
Probably. The potential has always been there, but it clearly wasn't
unlocked until just recently.
If we find a cheap solution then we can do something.
As a short term thing I am tempted to say just:
#define NR_IRQS (256 + (NR_CPUS*8))
Which would reduce kstat_irqs to 5k, and would relieve the immediate
symptoms.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-06 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-03 10:03 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 10:50 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-03 10:56 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 11:36 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-03 12:27 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Michal Piotrowski
2006-07-03 13:28 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Dmitry Torokhov
2006-07-03 11:00 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-03 11:25 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 12:34 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-03 11:39 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 11:41 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-03 12:10 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 13:36 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-03 20:21 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 20:31 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-03 12:29 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Sergey Vlasov
2006-07-03 17:25 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2006-07-03 19:01 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 12:15 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Cedric Le Goater
2006-07-03 12:17 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Heiko Carstens
2006-07-03 13:08 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Martin Peschke
2006-07-03 13:12 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Cedric Le Goater
2006-07-03 12:15 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Cedric Le Goater
2006-07-03 14:09 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Theodore Tso
2006-07-03 19:07 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-03 19:37 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 19:43 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-03 19:27 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-03 19:39 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 19:56 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-03 20:17 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 20:36 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-03 20:54 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-03 21:50 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-03 23:31 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-04 8:34 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-04 8:49 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-04 16:28 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-05 20:37 ` 2.6.17-mm6 john stultz
2006-07-05 20:46 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Greg KH
2006-07-05 22:32 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-06 17:31 ` 2.6.17-mm6 john stultz
2006-07-06 19:06 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-06 19:16 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-06 20:02 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-06 20:11 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Greg KH
2006-07-07 20:48 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-08 16:02 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alistair John Strachan
2006-07-03 22:10 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Anton Blanchard
2006-07-04 19:53 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Rafael J. Wysocki
2006-07-04 20:01 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-05 10:27 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Stefan Richter
2006-07-05 10:36 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Stefan Richter
2006-07-05 11:13 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Ingo Molnar
2006-07-05 21:43 ` 2.6.17-mm6 J.A. Magallón
2006-07-05 22:56 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-05 23:57 ` 2.6.17-mm6 J.A. Magallón
2006-07-06 0:02 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-06 14:36 ` 2.6.17-mm6 J.A. Magallón
2006-07-06 14:48 ` 2.6.17-mm6 J.A. Magallón
2006-07-06 21:44 ` 2.6.17-mm6 J.A. Magallón
2006-07-06 21:57 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-07 15:38 ` 2.6.17-mm6 J.A. Magallón
2006-07-07 16:02 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alan Cox
2006-07-07 15:55 ` 2.6.17-mm6 J.A. Magallón
2006-07-07 16:44 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alan Cox
2006-07-07 16:34 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Randy.Dunlap
2006-07-07 17:09 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alan Cox
2006-07-07 17:14 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-07 17:22 ` 2.6.17-mm6 David Lloyd
2006-07-07 17:23 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-07 17:44 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alan Cox
2006-07-07 17:39 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-07 20:03 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alan Cox
2006-07-07 19:59 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-07 20:23 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alan Cox
2006-07-07 20:14 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-07 20:42 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Alan Cox
2006-07-07 20:37 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-07 21:09 ` 2.6.17-mm6 J.A. Magallón
2006-07-07 21:11 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Jeff Garzik
2006-07-07 21:40 ` 2.6.17-mm6 J.A. Magallón
2006-07-06 23:26 ` 2.6.17-mm6 (try-3) Randy.Dunlap
[not found] ` <a762e240607051447x3c3c6e15k9cdb38804cf13f35@mail.gmail.com>
2006-07-05 22:50 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-05 23:28 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Keith Mannthey
2006-07-05 23:44 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-05 23:48 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-06 0:05 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Keith Mannthey
2006-07-06 0:25 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-06 5:42 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-06 5:59 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-06 6:31 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-06 7:18 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2006-07-06 7:25 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Ingo Molnar
2006-07-06 8:21 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-06 8:26 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Ingo Molnar
2006-07-06 7:31 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Arjan van de Ven
2006-07-06 16:37 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Valdis.Kletnieks
2006-07-06 16:49 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-06 6:40 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Eric W. Biederman
2006-07-06 7:38 ` 2.6.17-mm6 vmstat breakage Mike Galbraith
2006-07-06 8:24 ` Andrew Morton
2006-07-06 17:16 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andi Kleen
2006-07-12 3:55 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Steven Rostedt
2006-07-06 20:36 ` [-mm patch] drivers/edac/: make code static Adrian Bunk
2006-07-06 20:37 ` [-mm patch] fs/ocfs2/inode.c:ocfs2_refresh_inode(): remove unused variable Adrian Bunk
2006-07-06 20:43 ` Mark Fasheh
2006-07-06 20:37 ` [-mm patch] reiserfs: warn about the useless nolargeio option Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 0:35 ` Hans Reiser
2006-07-06 20:37 ` [-mm patch] drivers/net/e1000/: possible cleanups Adrian Bunk
2006-07-06 20:47 ` Auke Kok
2006-07-07 7:35 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-07 9:17 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-07 9:35 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-07 21:15 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-07 21:38 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-07 21:42 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Martin Bligh
2006-07-07 23:06 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Andrew Morton
2006-07-08 3:46 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Badari Pulavarty
2006-07-07 23:08 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-07 15:24 ` 2.6.17-mm6 Reuben Farrelly
2006-07-08 20:20 ` 2.6.17-mm6: kernel/sysctl.c: PROC_FS=n compile error Adrian Bunk
2006-07-09 18:52 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-07-09 23:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-07-10 14:22 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-07-10 15:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2006-07-07 14:21 2.6.17-mm6 Martin J. Bligh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m17j2r2od0.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=Natalie.Protasevich@UNISYS.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kmannth@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome