* [PATCH] worker_thread: don't play with SIGCHLD
@ 2007-04-13 7:29 Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-13 13:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2007-04-13 7:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Eric W. Biederman, linux-kernel
depends on Eric's
kthread-dont-depend-on-work-queues-take-2.patch
worker_thread() inherits ignored SIGCHLD from its parent, kthreadd.
We can remove unneeded do_sigaction().
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
--- OLD/kernel/workqueue.c~wt 2007-04-05 12:20:35.000000000 +0400
+++ OLD/kernel/workqueue.c 2007-04-13 11:21:43.000000000 +0400
@@ -289,7 +289,6 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__cwq)
{
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = __cwq;
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
- struct k_sigaction sa;
if (!cwq->wq->freezeable)
current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
@@ -300,12 +299,6 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__cwq)
*/
numa_default_policy();
- /* SIG_IGN makes children autoreap: see do_notify_parent(). */
- sa.sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN;
- sa.sa.sa_flags = 0;
- siginitset(&sa.sa.sa_mask, sigmask(SIGCHLD));
- do_sigaction(SIGCHLD, &sa, (struct k_sigaction *)0);
-
for (;;) {
if (cwq->wq->freezeable)
try_to_freeze();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] worker_thread: don't play with SIGCHLD
2007-04-13 7:29 [PATCH] worker_thread: don't play with SIGCHLD Oleg Nesterov
@ 2007-04-13 13:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-13 13:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2007-04-13 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oleg Nesterov; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:
> depends on Eric's
>
> kthread-dont-depend-on-work-queues-take-2.patch
>
> worker_thread() inherits ignored SIGCHLD from its parent, kthreadd.
> We can remove unneeded do_sigaction().
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Looks good.
We could delete all of:
> set_user_nice(current, -5);
>
> /* Block and flush all signals */
> sigfillset(&blocked);
> sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &blocked, NULL);
> flush_signals(current);
>
> /*
> * We inherited MPOL_INTERLEAVE from the booting kernel.
> * Set MPOL_DEFAULT to insure node local allocations.
> */
> numa_default_policy();
>
> /* SIG_IGN makes children autoreap: see do_notify_parent(). */
> sa.sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN;
> sa.sa.sa_flags = 0;
> siginitset(&sa.sa.sa_mask, sigmask(SIGCHLD));
> do_sigaction(SIGCHLD, &sa, (struct k_sigaction *)0);
If we wanted to, as that all comes by default from kthreadd.
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] worker_thread: don't play with SIGCHLD
2007-04-13 13:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
@ 2007-04-13 13:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-13 13:54 ` [PATCH] worker_thread: don't play with SIGCHLD and numa policy Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2007-04-13 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
On 04/13, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> writes:
>
> > depends on Eric's
> >
> > kthread-dont-depend-on-work-queues-take-2.patch
> >
> > worker_thread() inherits ignored SIGCHLD from its parent, kthreadd.
> > We can remove unneeded do_sigaction().
>
> Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
>
> Looks good.
>
> We could delete all of:
>
> > set_user_nice(current, -5);
> >
> > /* Block and flush all signals */
> > sigfillset(&blocked);
> > sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &blocked, NULL);
> > flush_signals(current);
this one is already deleted in -mm...
> > /*
> > * We inherited MPOL_INTERLEAVE from the booting kernel.
> > * Set MPOL_DEFAULT to insure node local allocations.
> > */
> > numa_default_policy();
Yes, I forgot about this!
> If we wanted to, as that all comes by default from kthreadd.
Thanks, will send an update.
Oleg.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] worker_thread: don't play with SIGCHLD and numa policy
2007-04-13 13:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
@ 2007-04-13 13:54 ` Oleg Nesterov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2007-04-13 13:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
depends on Eric's
kthread-dont-depend-on-work-queues-take-2.patch
worker_thread() inherits ignored SIGCHLD and numa_default_policy() from its
parent, kthreadd. No need to setup this again.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
--- OLD/kernel/workqueue.c~wt 2007-04-05 12:20:35.000000000 +0400
+++ OLD/kernel/workqueue.c 2007-04-13 17:43:23.000000000 +0400
@@ -289,23 +289,10 @@ static int worker_thread(void *__cwq)
{
struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq = __cwq;
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
- struct k_sigaction sa;
if (!cwq->wq->freezeable)
current->flags |= PF_NOFREEZE;
- /*
- * We inherited MPOL_INTERLEAVE from the booting kernel.
- * Set MPOL_DEFAULT to insure node local allocations.
- */
- numa_default_policy();
-
- /* SIG_IGN makes children autoreap: see do_notify_parent(). */
- sa.sa.sa_handler = SIG_IGN;
- sa.sa.sa_flags = 0;
- siginitset(&sa.sa.sa_mask, sigmask(SIGCHLD));
- do_sigaction(SIGCHLD, &sa, (struct k_sigaction *)0);
-
for (;;) {
if (cwq->wq->freezeable)
try_to_freeze();
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-13 13:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-13 7:29 [PATCH] worker_thread: don't play with SIGCHLD Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-13 13:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-04-13 13:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-04-13 13:54 ` [PATCH] worker_thread: don't play with SIGCHLD and numa policy Oleg Nesterov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®