Re: -nice tree [was Re: [Swsusp-devel] Re: swsusp problems [was Re: Your opinion on the merge?]]

["Michael Frank" <mhf@linuxmail.org>]

On Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:50:23 +0100, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:

> Hi!
>
>> >> > only "non compressed" part to reach mainline for 2.6. Feature freeze
>> >> > was few months ago, and "adding possibility to compress swsusp data"
>> >> > does not sound like a bugfix to me...
>> >>
>> >> Feature freeze is always half unfrozen anyway. 2.4 just gained XFS!
>> >> I'm
>> >
>> > XFS probably has 10+ people working on it, full time, and it still
>> > required quite a lot of pushing.
>>
>> We could push harder. Should we ask all swsusp2 users using
>> compression to announce themselves on LKML? ;)
>
> Hmm, I've one such troll announcing into my inbox, sending stuff like
> below. I hope he's the only one.

Is not what I had in mind. Please accept that people are benefitially
using compression, both lzf and gzip.

The individual in question has poor taste, I would never call anyone
my favorite dessert ;)

Michael

>
> Subject: Microsoft RULES!!!
> To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> ...
>
> So stop spreading nonsense about "NO COMPROMISES" and
> stop comparing
> me to Mickey$oft. Thanks.
>
> ---------------------
>
> Such a CUNT!!! Microsoft do very well engineered
> software, something Linux can't sadly achive in ages
> if still emply LOOSERS LIKE U.
>
> When a Microsoft engineer see a people like u, simply
> laugh!!!
>
> U MORON. U ARE SUCH A STUPID CUNT, NOW ALL THE LIST
> KNOW ABOUT U, WE ALL LAUGHT!
>
> and
>
>> So swsusp2 does _not_ fail. You still have a usable
> system instead of a
>> paniced system you seem to like to accept.
>
> If swsusp1 panics system, that's a bug. I'm not
> accepting that one.
>
> Refusing to suspend (I'd call it "fail to suspend") is
> bad but is not
> a bug. Do we understand each other now?
>
> -------------
>
> U know, I used to call u your name this days: STUPID,
> IDIOT, MORON, but that's not enough.
>
> Your last sentence related with your CRAPPY, LURID,
> DANGEROUS swsusp1 qualify u as what u are.
>
> A WORST GEEK, A LOOSER, A STUPID CUNT: U WONT EVER
> ADMIT YOUR PROGRAM CRASH AND THAT IS A BUG :-((((
>
>
>