mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
To: jmoyer@redhat.com
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	akpm@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [patch rfc] towards supporting O_NONBLOCK on regular files
Date: 19 Oct 2004 03:04:24 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <orekjvnt07.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16755.62608.19034.491032@segfault.boston.redhat.com>

On Oct 18, 2004, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:

> Select, pselect, and poll will always return data ready on a regular file.
> As such, I would argue that squid's behaviour is broken.  Additionally, I
> don't think it's a good idea to modify any polling mechanism to kick off
> I/O, if simply because I'm not sure how much data to request!

You could request a single block (whatever that means), and then the
subsequent non-blocking read would stand a chance of eventually making
progress.  .  Or you could request nothing, and have the actual read
start a readahead, such that next time it hopefully will have
something to get to immediately.  If the read comes in too quickly,
before the poll-initiated readahead completes, you'll probably get
them merged anyway, so it's not like it could hurt, methinks.

And then, you might arrange for select/poll to not return immediately
for these file descriptors, but rather return as soon as one of them
has some data available to read, the time-out expired, or a very short
time-out set for the case of non-blocking file descriptors select()ed
for read expired.  The latter time-out should be short enough to be
hardly distinguishable from an immediate return, and the return value
should be exactly what a POSIX-compliant application expects.

This doesn't quite fix the problem with the existing standard
interfaces, that don't quite enable anyone to do non-blocking reads
without explicit readahead advice and busy-waiting for data.  The
short time-out above should at least reduce the syscall explosion that
we get with the current behavior, but if read kicks in a readahead to
guarantee we'd eventually get out of the select/read loop without
external help to bring the data into memory, I guess we could live
without the select/poll changes.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva             http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}

  reply	other threads:[~2004-10-19  6:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-01 20:57 Jeff Moyer
2004-10-03 19:48 ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-13 14:28   ` Jeff Moyer
2004-10-14 17:39     ` Pavel Machek
2004-10-05 11:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-06 13:13   ` Jeff Moyer
2004-10-06 12:01     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-07  3:31       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-10-07 10:12         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-07 12:30           ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-10-11 18:32           ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-10-11 18:58             ` Jeff Moyer
2004-10-11 21:49               ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-10-13 14:26                 ` Jeff Moyer
2004-10-15 15:44                   ` Jeff Moyer
2004-10-15 16:19                     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2004-10-17  7:59                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-10-17 11:20                       ` Ingo Molnar
2004-10-17 19:38                         ` Alexandre Oliva
2004-10-18 16:51                           ` Jeff Moyer
2004-10-19  6:04                             ` Alexandre Oliva [this message]
2004-10-21 20:14                             ` James Antill
2004-10-05 15:35 ` Rik van Riel
2004-10-05 13:07 Dan Kegel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=orekjvnt07.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br \
    --to=aoliva@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®