From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>
To: Ulrich Weigand <weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6 nanosecond time stamp weirdness breaks GCC build
Date: 02 Apr 2004 14:27:56 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <orptaq8f37.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200404011928.VAA23657@faui1d.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
On Apr 1, 2004, Ulrich Weigand <weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> - STAMP = echo timestamp >
> + STAMP = sleep 1 >
I don't think this will fix the problem, at least not portably.
sleep 1 > filename
will truncate filename before sleep starts, modifying its timestamp at
that point, and leave it unchanged afterwards. Some systems might
update the timestamp again when the file truncated&opened for writing
is closed, but I don't think this is required. Worse yet: some
systems don't support empty files, and will error out because sleep 1
produced no output. Also, since some filesystems don't have 1-second
granularity, you should probably use `sleep 2' instead.
A more portable way to spell it would be:
STAMP = sleep 2; echo timestamp >
or, in order to make $(STAMP) usable in the middle of &&/|| sequences:
STAMP = { sleep 2; echo timestamp; } >
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-02 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-01 19:28 Ulrich Weigand
2004-04-01 20:09 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-01 20:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-01 20:46 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-01 21:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-04-01 21:44 ` Andi Kleen
2004-04-01 22:39 ` Joe Buck
2004-04-01 22:44 ` Paul Jarc
2004-04-01 22:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-04-01 23:58 ` Joe Buck
2004-04-02 0:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2004-04-02 0:02 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 0:35 ` Paul Eggert
2004-04-02 1:14 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 7:57 ` James H. Cloos Jr.
2004-04-02 9:22 ` Paul Eggert
2004-04-02 16:23 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 20:45 ` Paul Eggert
2004-04-02 21:07 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-04-02 21:56 ` Paul Eggert
2004-04-03 4:59 ` Andrew Pimlott
2004-04-02 0:37 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-07 16:03 ` Jörn Engel
2004-04-01 21:13 ` Janis Johnson
2004-04-01 21:41 ` Ulrich Weigand
2004-04-02 0:30 ` Alan Modra
2004-04-02 9:05 ` P
2004-04-02 17:27 ` Alexandre Oliva [this message]
2004-04-01 20:51 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=orptaq8f37.fsf@livre.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br \
--to=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=weigand@i1.informatik.uni-erlangen.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®