* [PATCH] ocfs2: hold a lock reference across grant AST enqueue
@ 2026-10-12 1:30 Cen Zhang
2026-10-13 7:56 ` Joseph Qi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Cen Zhang @ 2026-10-12 1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mark, jlbec, joseph.qi, heming.zhao, kees, sunil.mushran
Cc: ocfs2-devel, linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, jjzuming, zzzccc427
A newly granted remote lock must remain alive until its grant AST is
queued. dlmlock_master() publishes the lock on res->granted with its
base and queue references, then drops res->spinlock before calling
dlm_queue_ast(). The resource's reserved AST count does not retain the
lock itself.
This can fail when a peer dies with an immediately grantable CREATE
buffered on its socket. O2NET's node-down callback flushes receive work
before DLM cleanup, but the flush only waits for work queued on entry.
A data-ready callback that already selected the socket container can
queue new receive work after the flush advances its work color. Socket
shutdown does not discard bytes already queued for TCP receive.
The following ordering leaves the CREATE handler using a freed lock:
1. o2net_data_ready() selects the socket container while holding the
socket callback read lock.
2. o2net_disconnect_node() queues shutdown and starts its flush. The
callback queues sc_rx_work after the color change, then unlocks,
allowing shutdown to unregister callbacks and shut down the socket.
3. The flush completes without waiting for the new receive work. That
work consumes the buffered CREATE and dlmlock_master() grants the
lock before DLM cleanup reaches the resource, then drops
res->spinlock.
4. dlm_hb_node_down_cb() reaches dlm_free_dead_locks(), which takes
res->spinlock, unlinks the lock and drops both references to free it.
5. The CREATE handler calls dlm_queue_ast(). __dlm_queue_ast() reads
lock->lockres before acquiring its AST-list reference, causing UAF.
Take a temporary lock reference under res->spinlock when a grant AST
will be queued, and drop it after dlm_queue_ast(). This keeps the lock
alive across cleanup until the AST path has taken its own reference,
without reversing the existing AST/resource lock order.
KASAN report as below:
BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00
Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810ead5940 by task kworker/u16:3/52
CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 52 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Not tainted 7.3.0-rc4-next-20260921-pmb-bt-functional-v1+ #1 PREEMPT(lazy)
Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, arch_caps fix, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
Workqueue: o2net o2net_rx_until_empty
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0
print_report+0xce/0x630
? __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? __virt_addr_valid+0x20e/0x420
? __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00
kasan_report+0xe0/0x110
? __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00
__dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? do_raw_spin_lock+0x130/0x270
? __pfx___dlm_queue_ast+0x10/0x10
? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x45/0x60
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xeb/0x1a0
dlm_queue_ast+0x46/0x70
dlmlock_master+0x51f/0xf50
? __pfx_dlmlock_master+0x10/0x10
? dlm_create_lock_handler+0x2b2/0x870
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? lock_release+0xc8/0x290
dlm_create_lock_handler+0x35b/0x870
? __pfx_dlm_create_lock_handler+0x10/0x10
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x18/0x160
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x31/0x60
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? __pfx_dlm_create_lock_handler+0x10/0x10
o2net_rx_until_empty+0x1dae/0x32c0
? reacquire_held_locks+0xdd/0x200
? __pfx_o2net_rx_until_empty+0x10/0x10
? lock_acquire+0x190/0x300
? process_one_work+0x935/0x1b40
? process_one_work+0x834/0x1b40
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? lock_release+0xc8/0x290
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
process_one_work+0x9a8/0x1b40
? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10
? lock_acquire+0x190/0x300
? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x100
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
worker_thread+0x65c/0xe40
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? __kthread_parkme+0x177/0x220
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x351/0x460
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940
? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10
? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
? __switch_to+0x74f/0xf70
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
</TASK>
Allocated by task 52:
kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60
kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
__kasan_slab_alloc+0x89/0x90
kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x20b/0x5c0
dlm_new_lock+0x39/0x5f0
dlm_create_lock_handler+0x16e/0x870
o2net_rx_until_empty+0x1dae/0x32c0
process_one_work+0x9a8/0x1b40
worker_thread+0x65c/0xe40
kthread+0x351/0x460
ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
Freed by task 603:
kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60
kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60
__kasan_slab_free+0x5f/0x80
kmem_cache_free+0x242/0x580
dlm_lock_release+0x1df/0x2f0
dlm_lock_put+0x51/0x80
__dlm_hb_node_down+0x15be/0x2710
dlm_hb_node_down_cb+0x6c/0xa0
o2hb_run_event_list+0x34a/0x500
o2hb_do_disk_heartbeat+0x1a07/0x2950
o2hb_thread+0x1ed/0xdc0
kthread+0x351/0x460
ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88810ead5900
which belongs to the cache o2dlm_lock of size 184
The buggy address is located 64 bytes inside of
freed 184-byte region [ffff88810ead5900, ffff88810ead59b8)
[Page and shadow memory dumps omitted.]
Fixes: 2c5c54aca9d0 ("ocfs2/dlm: Add missing dlm_lock_put()s")
Assisted-by: LLM
Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
index 46120eb75d90..660237c0d7cd 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
@@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ static enum dlm_status dlmlock_master(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
res->lockname.len)) {
kick_thread = 1;
call_ast = 1;
+ /* Keep the lock alive through AST enqueue. */
+ dlm_lock_get(lock);
} else {
mlog(0, "%s: returning DLM_NORMAL to "
"node %u for reco lock\n", dlm->name,
@@ -166,10 +168,12 @@ static enum dlm_status dlmlock_master(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
wake_up(&res->wq);
/* either queue the ast or release it */
- if (call_ast)
+ if (call_ast) {
dlm_queue_ast(dlm, lock);
- else
+ dlm_lock_put(lock);
+ } else {
dlm_lockres_release_ast(dlm, res);
+ }
dlm_lockres_calc_usage(dlm, res);
if (kick_thread)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] ocfs2: hold a lock reference across grant AST enqueue
2026-10-12 1:30 [PATCH] ocfs2: hold a lock reference across grant AST enqueue Cen Zhang
@ 2026-10-13 7:56 ` Joseph Qi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joseph Qi @ 2026-10-13 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cen Zhang
Cc: mark, jlbec, heming.zhao, kees, sunil.mushran, ocfs2-devel,
linux-kernel, baijiaju1990, jjzuming
On 10/12/26 9:30 AM, Cen Zhang wrote:
> A newly granted remote lock must remain alive until its grant AST is
> queued. dlmlock_master() publishes the lock on res->granted with its
> base and queue references, then drops res->spinlock before calling
> dlm_queue_ast(). The resource's reserved AST count does not retain the
> lock itself.
>
> This can fail when a peer dies with an immediately grantable CREATE
> buffered on its socket. O2NET's node-down callback flushes receive work
> before DLM cleanup, but the flush only waits for work queued on entry.
> A data-ready callback that already selected the socket container can
> queue new receive work after the flush advances its work color. Socket
> shutdown does not discard bytes already queued for TCP receive.
>
> The following ordering leaves the CREATE handler using a freed lock:
>
> 1. o2net_data_ready() selects the socket container while holding the
> socket callback read lock.
> 2. o2net_disconnect_node() queues shutdown and starts its flush. The
> callback queues sc_rx_work after the color change, then unlocks,
> allowing shutdown to unregister callbacks and shut down the socket.
> 3. The flush completes without waiting for the new receive work. That
> work consumes the buffered CREATE and dlmlock_master() grants the
> lock before DLM cleanup reaches the resource, then drops
> res->spinlock.
> 4. dlm_hb_node_down_cb() reaches dlm_free_dead_locks(), which takes
> res->spinlock, unlinks the lock and drops both references to free it.
> 5. The CREATE handler calls dlm_queue_ast(). __dlm_queue_ast() reads
> lock->lockres before acquiring its AST-list reference, causing UAF.
>
It is better to illustrate the race case with a sequence diagram.
Also please change the patch title to "ocfs2/dlm: xxx".
> Take a temporary lock reference under res->spinlock when a grant AST
> will be queued, and drop it after dlm_queue_ast(). This keeps the lock
> alive across cleanup until the AST path has taken its own reference,
> without reversing the existing AST/resource lock order.
>
> KASAN report as below:
>
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff88810ead5940 by task kworker/u16:3/52
>
> CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 52 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Not tainted 7.3.0-rc4-next-20260921-pmb-bt-functional-v1+ #1 PREEMPT(lazy)
> Hardware name: QEMU Ubuntu 24.04 PC v2 (i440FX + PIIX, arch_caps fix, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
> Workqueue: o2net o2net_rx_until_empty
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> dump_stack_lvl+0x93/0xd0
> print_report+0xce/0x630
> ? __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __virt_addr_valid+0x20e/0x420
> ? __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00
> kasan_report+0xe0/0x110
> ? __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00
> __dlm_queue_ast+0x8a4/0xc00
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x130/0x270
> ? __pfx___dlm_queue_ast+0x10/0x10
> ? __pfx_do_raw_spin_lock+0x10/0x10
> ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x45/0x60
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0xeb/0x1a0
> dlm_queue_ast+0x46/0x70
> dlmlock_master+0x51f/0xf50
> ? __pfx_dlmlock_master+0x10/0x10
> ? dlm_create_lock_handler+0x2b2/0x870
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? lock_release+0xc8/0x290
> dlm_create_lock_handler+0x35b/0x870
> ? __pfx_dlm_create_lock_handler+0x10/0x10
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? trace_hardirqs_on+0x18/0x160
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? kvm_clock_get_cycles+0x31/0x60
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __pfx_dlm_create_lock_handler+0x10/0x10
> o2net_rx_until_empty+0x1dae/0x32c0
> ? reacquire_held_locks+0xdd/0x200
> ? __pfx_o2net_rx_until_empty+0x10/0x10
> ? lock_acquire+0x190/0x300
> ? process_one_work+0x935/0x1b40
> ? process_one_work+0x834/0x1b40
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? lock_release+0xc8/0x290
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> process_one_work+0x9a8/0x1b40
> ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10
> ? lock_acquire+0x190/0x300
> ? lock_is_held_type+0x8f/0x100
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> worker_thread+0x65c/0xe40
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __kthread_parkme+0x177/0x220
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> kthread+0x351/0x460
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940
> ? __pfx_ret_from_fork+0x10/0x10
> ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
> ? __switch_to+0x74f/0xf70
> ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
> </TASK>
>
> Allocated by task 52:
> kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60
> kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
> __kasan_slab_alloc+0x89/0x90
> kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x20b/0x5c0
> dlm_new_lock+0x39/0x5f0
> dlm_create_lock_handler+0x16e/0x870
> o2net_rx_until_empty+0x1dae/0x32c0
> process_one_work+0x9a8/0x1b40
> worker_thread+0x65c/0xe40
> kthread+0x351/0x460
> ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>
> Freed by task 603:
> kasan_save_stack+0x33/0x60
> kasan_save_track+0x14/0x30
> kasan_save_free_info+0x3b/0x60
> __kasan_slab_free+0x5f/0x80
> kmem_cache_free+0x242/0x580
> dlm_lock_release+0x1df/0x2f0
> dlm_lock_put+0x51/0x80
> __dlm_hb_node_down+0x15be/0x2710
> dlm_hb_node_down_cb+0x6c/0xa0
> o2hb_run_event_list+0x34a/0x500
> o2hb_do_disk_heartbeat+0x1a07/0x2950
> o2hb_thread+0x1ed/0xdc0
> kthread+0x351/0x460
> ret_from_fork+0x659/0x940
> ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>
> The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88810ead5900
> which belongs to the cache o2dlm_lock of size 184
> The buggy address is located 64 bytes inside of
> freed 184-byte region [ffff88810ead5900, ffff88810ead59b8)
>
> [Page and shadow memory dumps omitted.]
>
> Fixes: 2c5c54aca9d0 ("ocfs2/dlm: Add missing dlm_lock_put()s")
> Assisted-by: LLM
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> is missing here.
Thanks,
Joseph
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
> index 46120eb75d90..660237c0d7cd 100644
> --- a/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
> +++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmlock.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ static enum dlm_status dlmlock_master(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
> res->lockname.len)) {
> kick_thread = 1;
> call_ast = 1;
> + /* Keep the lock alive through AST enqueue. */
> + dlm_lock_get(lock);
> } else {
> mlog(0, "%s: returning DLM_NORMAL to "
> "node %u for reco lock\n", dlm->name,
> @@ -166,10 +168,12 @@ static enum dlm_status dlmlock_master(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
> wake_up(&res->wq);
>
> /* either queue the ast or release it */
> - if (call_ast)
> + if (call_ast) {
> dlm_queue_ast(dlm, lock);
> - else
> + dlm_lock_put(lock);
> + } else {
> dlm_lockres_release_ast(dlm, res);
> + }
>
> dlm_lockres_calc_usage(dlm, res);
> if (kick_thread)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-10-13 7:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-10-12 1:30 [PATCH] ocfs2: hold a lock reference across grant AST enqueue Cen Zhang
2026-10-13 7:56 ` Joseph Qi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®