From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, tj@kernel.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, mkoutny@suse.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 22/29] sched/deadline: Make a rebuild use the CPU recorded with a task's bandwidth
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2026 19:25:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-203947@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261108185406.1549770-23-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [Medium] sched/deadline: wrong root domain in dl_task_rebuild_cpu() on
empty mask
--
commit 2d9a77b300d6ae31513d7938853f189f48778450
Author: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
sched/deadline: Make a rebuild use the CPU recorded with a task's bandwidth
This commit updates deadline root domain accounting rebuilds to select a
task's root domain from its current CPU, recorded bandwidth CPU, or active
cpumask, and skips tasks with no active CPU instead of hitting BUG_ON().
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 8d9e55bca9439..bc31045e4686f 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -3720,6 +3726,55 @@ static void dl_get_task_effective_cpus(struct task_struct *p, struct cpumask *cp
[ ... ]
> +static unsigned int dl_task_rebuild_cpu(struct task_struct *p)
> +{
> + struct cpumask *msk = this_cpu_cpumask_var_ptr(local_cpu_mask_dl);
> + int recorded = p->dl.dl_bw_cpu;
> + unsigned int cpu;
> +
> + /*
> + * Look at the mask of the task first. A change of the cpusets sets
> + * the mask of each task before its rebuild. The housekeeping mask
> + * that dl_get_task_effective_cpus() reads is updated after it. If no
> + * CPU of the mask is active, take the CPU recorded if it is active:
> + * dl_task_offline_migration() moved the task there. Else ask the
> + * cpuset.
> + */
> + cpumask_and(msk, &p->cpus_mask, cpu_active_mask);
> + cpu = task_cpu(p);
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, msk))
> + return cpu;
> + if (cpumask_empty(msk)) {
> + if (recorded >= 0 && cpu_active(recorded))
> + return recorded;
> + dl_get_task_effective_cpus(p, msk);
> + cpumask_and(msk, msk, cpu_active_mask);
> + }
> + if (recorded >= 0 && cpumask_test_cpu(recorded, msk))
> + return recorded;
[Severity: Medium]
Can returning recorded whenever cpu_active(recorded) is true on an empty
msk charge a sleeping task's bandwidth to a stale root domain instead of
consulting dl_get_task_effective_cpus()?
Suppose a task in top_cpuset with user_cpus_ptr = {1} and cpus_mask = {1}
is asleep when CPU 1 goes offline. Top_cpuset tasks do not have cpus_mask
reset on hotplug, so the hotplug rebuild sees cpumask_empty(msk), queries
dl_get_task_effective_cpus(), and records active CPU 0 in p->dl.dl_bw_cpu.
If a new cpuset partition root is then created on CPU 0 while the task
stays asleep, cpuset_update_tasks_cpumask() intersects the remaining
possible CPUs with user_cpus_ptr ({1}), leaving cpus_mask as {1}. The
partition rebuild then sees cpumask_empty(msk) and cpu_active(0), and
returns CPU 0 without calling dl_get_task_effective_cpus(), charging the
task's bandwidth to the new partition on CPU 0 rather than top_cpuset.
Also, because the cpumask_empty(msk) block returns early whenever recorded
is active, if execution reaches dl_get_task_effective_cpus() and
cpumask_and(msk, msk, cpu_active_mask), recorded is guaranteed to be
inactive, so the subsequent cpumask_test_cpu(recorded, msk) check can
never succeed after that fallback.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261108185406.1549770-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com?part=22
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-08 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-08 18:53 [PATCH v5 00/29] sched/deadline: bandwidth accounting fixes and selftests Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 01/29] sched: Fix cpuset_mutex double unlock in __sched_setscheduler() Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 02/29] sched: Refuse SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS that would change the policy or the class Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 03/29] sched/deadline: Do not admit bandwidth for parameters that are kept Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 04/29] sched: Let a task boosted by a deadline waiter change its policy Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 05/29] sched/deadline: Do not divide by zero active CPUs of a root domain Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 06/29] sched: Take cpuset_mutex for a deadline policy change only with pi Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 07/29] sched/deadline: Do not lose a throttled task switched out and back Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/29] sched/deadline: Take a deadline boost from the waiter's rt_mutex node Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/29] sched/deadline: Reset the deadline and the runtime with the parameters Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/29] sched/deadline: Reset the donor's runtime at a deboost in the class Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 19:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 11/29] sched/deadline: Release the bandwidth of a task that leaves the class asleep Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 12/29] sched/deadline: Reject SCHED_DEADLINE on exited tasks Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 13/29] sched/deadline: Keep departing bandwidth across a root domain rebuild Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 14/29] sched/deadline: Fix this_bw when a task is changed during a remote wakeup Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 15/29] sched/deadline: Rebuild the root domains' accounting from the task list Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 16/29] sched/deadline: Record the root domain holding a task's bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 17/29] sched/deadline: Leave a dying task out of a rebuild of the accounting Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 18/29] sched/deadline: Move a task's bandwidth only where room was made Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 19:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 19/29] cgroup/cpuset: Wait for an attach before rebuilding the sched domains Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 20/29] cgroup/cpuset: Give back the bandwidth an attach did not move Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 21/29] cgroup/cpuset: Reserve the bandwidth in the root domain a task moves to Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 19:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 18:53 ` [PATCH v5 22/29] sched/deadline: Make a rebuild use the CPU recorded with a task's bandwidth Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 19:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-08 18:54 ` [PATCH v5 23/29] sched/deadline: Move a task's bandwidth when it must leave its CPU Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 19:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-08 18:54 ` [PATCH v5 24/29] sched/deadline: Cancel the replenishment timer with the parameters Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:54 ` [PATCH v5 25/29] sched/deadline: Count the bandwidth a boosted task is given Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:54 ` [PATCH v5 26/29] sched/debug: Show the deadline bandwidth of each runqueue Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:54 ` [PATCH v5 27/29] selftests/sched: Add a test of SCHED_DEADLINE policy round trips Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:54 ` [PATCH v5 28/29] selftests/sched: Test SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth across a root domain rebuild Mathieu Desnoyers
2026-11-08 18:54 ` [PATCH v5 29/29] selftests/sched: Add a test of SCHED_DEADLINE bandwidth accounting Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-203947@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®