Re: [PATCH v2] PM: EM: Fix potential division-by-zero error in em_compute_costs()

[Yaxiong Tian <iambestgod@qq.com>]

在 2025/4/17 15:20, Geert Uytterhoeven 写道:
> Hi Yaxiong,
> 
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2025 at 11:14, Yaxiong Tian <iambestgod@qq.com> wrote:
>> I wasn’t sure whether the new patch should reuse the current Message-ID
>> or create a new one, so I checked with ChatGPT and kept the original
>> Message-ID for v2. If a new Message-ID is required, I can resend the
>> email.
> 
> Different (revisions of) patches must have different Message-IDs,
> else they can no longer be distinguished by our tooling.
> Fortunately it seems like you didn't succeed (which is good ;-),
> as all four revisions do have different Message-IDs:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_8478BF8F2549630842D323E7394CB6F49D08@qq.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_EE27C7D1D6BDB3EE57A2C467CC59A866C405@qq.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_6D2374392DB66C9D23BF6E2546638A42EC08@qq.com/
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/tencent_2256A7C02F7849F1D89390E488704E826D06@qq.com/
> 
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
> 
>                          Geert
> 
Thank you for your explanation. My previous description might have been
a bit unclear. Actually, what I meant was whether it should be --in-
reply-to=original Message-ID. I think if it's a patch, replying to the
  original Message-ID would be better.