mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf <tipbot@zytor.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, jslaby@suse.cz,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	jgross@suse.com, mingo@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [tip:core/objtool] x86/head: Remove confusing comment
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 03:55:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tip-17270717e80de33a884ad328fea5f407d87f6d6a@git.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3c267b770fc56c9b86df9c11c552848248aace2.1505764066.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>

Commit-ID:  17270717e80de33a884ad328fea5f407d87f6d6a
Gitweb:     https://git.kernel.org/tip/17270717e80de33a884ad328fea5f407d87f6d6a
Author:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 21:43:31 -0500
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:39:02 +0200

x86/head: Remove confusing comment

This comment is actively wrong and confusing.  It refers to the
registers' stack offsets after the pt_regs has been constructed on the
stack, but this code is *before* that.

At this point the stack just has the standard iret frame, for which no
comment should be needed.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a3c267b770fc56c9b86df9c11c552848248aace2.1505764066.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
index 513cbb0..3b04e4c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S
@@ -270,10 +270,6 @@ bad_address:
 
 	__INIT
 ENTRY(early_idt_handler_array)
-	# 104(%rsp) %rflags
-	#  96(%rsp) %cs
-	#  88(%rsp) %rip
-	#  80(%rsp) error code
 	i = 0
 	.rept NUM_EXCEPTION_VECTORS
 	.ifeq (EXCEPTION_ERRCODE_MASK >> i) & 1

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-28 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-19  2:43 [PATCH v2 0/8] x86/asm: Add unwind hint annotations to head code Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-19  2:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] objtool: Don't report end of section error after an empty unwind hint Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-28 10:54   ` [tip:core/objtool] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-19  2:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] x86/head: Remove confusing comment Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-28 10:55   ` tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-09-19  2:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] x86/head: Remove unused 'bad_address' code Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-28 10:55   ` [tip:core/objtool] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-19  2:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] x86/head: Fix head ELF function annotations Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-28 10:56   ` [tip:core/objtool] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-19  2:43 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] x86/boot: Annotate verify_cpu() as a callable function Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-28 10:56   ` [tip:core/objtool] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-19  2:43 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] x86/xen: Fix xen head ELF annotations Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-28 10:56   ` [tip:core/objtool] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-19  2:43 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] x86/xen: Add unwind hint annotations Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-28 10:57   ` [tip:core/objtool] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-19  2:43 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] x86/head: " Josh Poimboeuf
2017-09-28 10:57   ` [tip:core/objtool] " tip-bot for Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tip-17270717e80de33a884ad328fea5f407d87f6d6a@git.kernel.org \
    --to=tipbot@zytor.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome