mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: non-rot devices do not need read queue merging
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 16:19:08 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x49y6kc6yib.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100105151353.GA4631@redhat.com> (Vivek Goyal's message of "Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:13:53 -0500")

Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> writes:

> Thanks Jeff, one thing comes to mind. Now with recent changes, we drive deeper
> depths on SSD with NCQ and there are not many pending cfqq on service tree
> until and unless number of parallel threads exceed NCQ depth (32). If
> that's the case, then I think we might not be seeing lot of queue merging
> happening in this test case until and unless dump utility is creating more
> than 32 threads.
>
> If time permits, it might also be interesting to run the same test with queue
> depth 1 and see if SSDs without NCQ will suffer or not.

Corrado, I think what Vivek is getting at is that you should check for
both blk_queue_nonrot and cfqd->hw_tag (like in cfq_arm_slice_timer).
Do you agree?

Cheers,
Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-05 21:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-30 12:10 [PATCH] cfq-iosched: non-rot devices do not need " Corrado Zoccolo
2009-12-30 18:45 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-30 20:31   ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-12-30 21:11     ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-30 21:21       ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-12-30 21:34         ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-30 22:22           ` [PATCH] cfq-iosched: non-rot devices do not need read " Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-04 14:47             ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-04 16:36               ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-04 16:51                 ` Jeff Moyer
2010-01-04 18:32                   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-04 18:37                   ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-04 18:51                     ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-04 19:04                       ` Jeff Moyer
2010-01-04 20:37                         ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-05 14:58                           ` Jeff Moyer
2010-01-05 15:13                             ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-05 21:19                               ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2010-01-05 21:48                                 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-07 10:56                                   ` Kirill Afonshin
2010-01-07 13:38                                     ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-07 14:36                                       ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-07 17:00                                         ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-07 18:37                                           ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-07 20:16                                             ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-08 18:53                                               ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-10 12:55                                   ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-10 21:04             ` [PATCH] cfq-iosched: NCQ SSDs " Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-10 21:08               ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-11 11:25               ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-11 12:26                 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-11 13:13                   ` Jens Axboe
2010-01-11 13:18                     ` Jeff Garzik
2010-01-11 13:24                       ` Jens Axboe
2010-01-11 14:53                       ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-11 16:44                         ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-11 17:00                           ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-11 17:07                             ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-11 19:05                               ` Corrado Zoccolo
2010-01-11 17:11                             ` Vivek Goyal
2010-01-11 19:09                               ` Corrado Zoccolo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x49y6kc6yib.fsf@segfault.boston.devel.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
    --cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®