Re: [2.6.11-rc5-mm1 patch] reiser4 Kconfig help cleanup

[Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com>]

>>>>> "Adrian" == Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> writes:

Adrian> The current reiser4 help texts have two disadvantages: 1. they
Adrian> are more marketing speech than technical speech with some
Adrian> debatable statements 2. they are too long

Excellent patch, that help description has been totally inappropriate
since it was first introduced. I'm sure it will do fine on namesys'
website, but not in the kernel.

Adrian> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@wildopensource.com>

Speaking of inappropriate components in reiser4:

[jes@tomahawk linux-2.6.11-rc5-mm1]$ grep PG_arch fs/reiser4/*.c
fs/reiser4/page_cache.c:               page_flag_name(page, PG_arch_1),
fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c:                    assert("vs-1448", test_and_clear_bit(PG_arch_1, &node->pg->flags));
fs/reiser4/txnmgr.c:            ON_DEBUG(set_bit(PG_arch_1, &(copy->pg)->flags));

Someone was obviously smoking something illegal, what part of 'arch'
did she/he not understand? I assume we can request this is fixed by
the patch owner asap.

Cheers,
Jes