From: "Måns Rullgård" <mru@inprovide.com>
To: Patrick McFarland <pmcfarland@downeast.net>
Cc: Lennart Sorensen <lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>,
"Richard B. Johnson" <linux-os@analogic.com>,
Lukasz Stelmach <stlman@poczta.fm>,
"Alexander E. Patrakov" <patrakov@ums.usu.ru>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 11:17:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1xy899wde4.fsf@ford.inprovide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200506170450.12943.pmcfarland@downeast.net> (Patrick McFarland's message of "Fri, 17 Jun 2005 04:49:33 -0400")
Patrick McFarland <pmcfarland@downeast.net> writes:
> On Friday 17 June 2005 04:21 am, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>> Patrick McFarland <pmcfarland@downeast.net> writes:
>> > On Thursday 16 June 2005 11:04 am, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
>> >> Most people seem happy with 50 or so being a good limit even though
>> >> many systems support much longer.
>> >
>> > 50 characters or 50 bytes? Because in the case of UTF-8, if you do a lot
>> > of three byte characters (which require four bites to encode), 50 bytes
>> > is very short.
>>
>> What do you mean by three-byte characters requiring four bytes to
>> encode? Is a three-byte character not a character encoded using three
>> bytes?
>
> (implication of utf8 and not utf16 goes here)
>
> Very few Unicode characters require three bytes, instead of the
> usual one or two.
I wouldn't the Chinese, Japanese, and Korean characters "very few",
and those all require (at least) three bytes.
> For one byte you just have the byte.
Correct.
> For two bytes, you really have three: a control code stating "the
> following two bytes are a two byte character", and then the two
> bytes.
>
> For three bytes, you really have four bytes: a control code stating
> "the following three bytes are a three byte character" and then the
> three bytes.
Wrong. The first byte indicates the total size of the character, but
it also contains data, like this:
0xxxxxxx
110xxxxx 10xxxxxx
1110xxxx 10xxxxxx 10xxxxxx
11110xxx 10xxxxxx 10xxxxxx 10xxxxxx
Refer to the Unicode standard, section 3.9 for the full details.
>> As for 50 bytes being too short, many of the multibyte characters are
>> equivalent to several English characters, so fewer of them are
>> required. You have a point, though.
>
> Any English characters (ie, the first 127 ascii characters) map
> directly to the first 127 Unicode characters (if thats what you
> meant).
Let me clarify with an example. The common Korean name Kim consists
of three ascii characters. The Hangul spelling, ~, is encoded in
utf-8 using three bytes. Even though a three-byte character was used,
the number of bytes is the same.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@inprovide.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-17 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-13 10:38 Alexey Zaytsev
2005-06-13 10:49 ` Stefan Smietanowski
2005-06-13 18:01 ` Islam Amer
2005-06-14 9:32 ` Islam Amer
2005-06-14 10:10 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-14 15:28 ` Islam Amer
2005-06-13 12:05 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-06-13 13:54 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2005-06-13 14:32 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-06-13 17:38 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2005-06-13 18:58 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-14 8:04 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2005-06-14 9:05 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-15 8:26 ` Lukasz Stelmach
2005-06-15 8:54 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-06-15 9:14 ` Lukasz Stelmach
2005-06-15 9:41 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-15 14:52 ` Lukasz Stelmach
2005-06-15 21:28 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-06-15 23:34 ` Lukasz Stelmach
2005-06-16 1:44 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-06-16 10:38 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-16 11:36 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-06-16 20:41 ` Rob Sims
2005-06-16 9:40 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-18 14:48 ` Lukasz Stelmach
2005-06-18 23:22 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-22 8:41 ` Lukasz Stelmach
2005-06-16 13:39 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-06-16 14:44 ` Richard B. Johnson
2005-06-16 15:04 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-06-17 1:18 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-06-17 8:21 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-17 8:49 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-06-17 9:17 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2005-06-17 9:37 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-17 9:41 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-06-17 13:09 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-06-17 13:23 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-18 16:04 ` Robin Rosenberg
2005-06-18 18:06 ` Kari Hurtta
2005-06-18 21:57 ` Robin Rosenberg
2005-06-18 19:09 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-06-17 12:56 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-06-18 22:30 ` Bernd Eckenfels
2005-06-16 1:42 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-06-13 13:35 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-13 17:20 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2005-06-13 19:20 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-13 19:38 ` Måns Rullgård
2005-06-13 20:31 ` Rutger Nijlunsing
2005-06-15 20:50 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2005-06-16 1:52 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-06-16 10:14 ` Alexey Zaytsev
2005-06-16 1:49 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-06-16 2:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-06-16 2:59 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-06-16 4:33 ` Jeremy Maitin-Shepard
2005-06-16 14:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2005-06-19 17:55 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-20 18:38 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-20 22:19 ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-20 23:38 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-08-26 0:00 ` Daniel B.
2005-08-26 8:34 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2005-08-26 14:07 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-15 9:13 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-06-16 1:55 ` Patrick McFarland
2005-06-16 3:59 ` [RFC] Filesystem name storage (Was: A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS.) Kyle Moffett
2005-06-18 15:24 ` Lukasz Stelmach
[not found] <4eUwr-7i7-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4ffAV-72e-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4fBrR-7eO-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4fBUW-7wi-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4fCe4-7Rm-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4fCHg-89R-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4fHxo-3Lo-63@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4fNMd-l6-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-06-17 9:12 ` A Great Idea (tm) about reimplementing NLS Bodo Eggert
2005-06-18 15:31 ` Lukasz Stelmach
[not found] <4glbh-xY-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4glbh-xY-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4glbh-xY-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4glbh-xY-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4glbh-xY-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4glbh-xY-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4glbh-xY-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4glbh-xY-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <4glbh-xY-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-06-17 9:56 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-06-17 23:22 Islam Amer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1xy899wde4.fsf@ford.inprovide.com \
--to=mru@inprovide.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
--cc=lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=patrakov@ums.usu.ru \
--cc=pmcfarland@downeast.net \
--cc=stlman@poczta.fm \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome