From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@kernel.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
Nikhil Agarwal <nikhil.agarwal@amd.com>,
Pieter Jansen van Vuuren <pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/19] net: phy: Use the compatibility driver attachment API
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 15:31:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <019fceab-1b0b-44a5-8cef-1f77d7d6ac07@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110073919.GF8635@unreal>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2026 at 09:39:19AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2026 at 02:45:35PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > @@ -1956,11 +1958,10 @@ int phy_attach_direct(struct net_device *dev, struct phy_device *phydev,
> > > }
> > > phydev->drv_owner = drv_owner;
> > >
> > > - if (phydev->is_genphy_driven) {
> > > - err = d->driver->probe(d);
> > > - if (err >= 0)
> > > - err = device_bind_driver(d);
> > > -
> > > + if (bind_genphy) {
> > > + err = device_driver_attach_full(drv, d);
> > > + if (err == -EBUSY)
> > > + irq = phydev->irq;
> >
> > Just looking at this, it is not clear where the EBUSY can from?
>
> I relied on the comment above: “Assume that if there is no driver, ...”.
> Since PHYs do not use the standard automatic probing mechanism, I have no
> way to tell whether a driver is already bound.
They do use the automatic probe mechanism. But also extend it.
Maybe some background will help.
IEEE 802.3 specifies how PHYs should operate, it list all the
registers which are needed for basic operation etc. If a PHY follows
the standard, genphy is sufficient to drive the PHY.
Now. Networking vendors like to do two things:
1) Do more than what the standard specifies, like interrupts and
blinking LEDs.
2) Don't closely read the standard, and break their implementation
These two cases require a specific driver.
There is a lot of history to phylib, from before my time. It seems
like the current model was retrofitted around earlier code. The result
is that when the MDIO bus is enumerated, PHYs can be found on the bus
and are registered to the bus in the normal way. The driver core will
look to see if there is a driver which matches the ID values in
registers 2 and 3, and if so probe that driver. If there is no
matching driver, a call is made to user space to ask it to load the
driver with the given IDs. That operates asynchronous, when such a
driver is loaded, the driver core will run the match again and probe
the device with the driver.
Because there can be up to 32 devices on the MDIO bus, the MAC driver
often knows which PHY device it should use. If not, MAC drivers
sometimes use the first PHY on the bus. It does not really matter, the
point is, we know the device exists, even if it has not been probed
yet, so we can get a reference to it.
The MAC most often connects to its PHY during open(). At that point,
if the driver core has bound a PHY driver to the PHY device, it is
good to go.
If however, there is no PHY driver for the PHY device, it can mean a
few different things:
There is no driver of that PHY because it follows 802.3, and genphy is
expected to be used. However, genphy does not have a list of IDs it
can drive, so the usual probing mechanism does not match it to the
device. It would be nice if it did actually have such a list, but it
does not.
There is driver, but it has not been built, or is missing from the
initramfs, or is not part of the image, etc. So we just use the genphy
driver and hope for the best.
So, if we have got this far, there is no driver for the PHY, we make
use of genphy.
> > And why set irq to phydev->irq?
>
> If the above operation can fail with -EBUSY, the wrong IRQ was restored.
How has it got the wrong interrupt?
genphy cannot use interrupts, because interrupts are not part of
802.3. Device tree can list an interrupt for the device, and if the
device specific driver is used, phylib can use that
interrupt. However, since interrupts are optional, phylib defaults to
polling. phydev->irq is over powered and set to PHY_POLL to indicate
polling should be used. The phylib core will look at the PHY driver,
see if it supports interrupts, and if not, set phydev->irq ==
PHY_POLL.
The binding of genphy to the device cannot fail, at least in the
current phylib code. So up until recently, setting phydev->irq to
PHY_POLL was fine. However, that is changing. There is a use case,
because of bad hardware design, that genphy is initially used to get
the device up. But later, the real driver module becomes available and
gets loaded. /sysfs is then used to unbind genphy and bind the
specific driver. Because phylib has set phydev->irq to PHY_POLL, the
specific driver cannot use interrupts. So on unbind, phydev->irq is
set back to the value in the MDIO bus.
As is said, this code is fragile, and complex. You have to assume your
LLM is producing slop, and really take a close look at the code, if
you want to get it correct.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-10 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 7:33 [PATCH v2 00/19] driver core: Authorize device trust before driver binding Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 01/19] Input: gameport - attach manual drivers through the driver core Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 02/19] wifi: mac80211_hwsim: lock device for manual driver binding Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 03/19] USB: Lock registered interfaces during " Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 04/19] USB: Release interface claims refused during registration Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 05/19] PNP: Attach card devices through the driver core Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 06/19] cdx: Propagate DMA configuration errors Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 07/19] driver core: Report deferred probes through sysfs drivers_probe Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 08/19] driver core: Add a compatibility API for manual driver attachment Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 09/19] Input: serio - use the compatibility driver attachment API Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 10/19] net: phy: Use " Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 13:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-11-10 7:39 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-10 14:31 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2026-11-10 14:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 11/19] driver core: Introduce a generic device trust level Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 12/19] driver core: Expose device trust authorization interfaces Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 13/19] driver core: Accept device trust policy on the kernel command line Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 14/19] driver core: Accept device trust policy by driver name Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 15/19] driver core: Expose committed device trust level Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 16/19] driver core: Cover trust authorization and binding with KUnit Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 17/19] driver core: Document trust admission and initrd authorization Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 18/19] PCI: Replace untrusted state with device trust Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 13:53 ` Robin Murphy
2026-11-10 12:22 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-10 14:25 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-11-10 14:34 ` Leon Romanovsky
2026-11-09 7:33 ` [PATCH v2 19/19] USB: Authorize devices and interfaces through " Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=019fceab-1b0b-44a5-8cef-1f77d7d6ac07@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikhil.agarwal@amd.com \
--cc=nipun.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pieter.jansen-van-vuuren@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®